110 player test Server (test completed at 19:00hrs EST)

scottp05156 · Post by **scottp05156** » 2008-03-21 21:43

Need some testers: We're putting a test server online now 69.12.76.129 kashan

Post by **PARAMEDIC.CA** » 2008-03-21 21:45

enroute... thx for the effort, Scott!

PlatinumA1 · Post by **PlatinumA1** » 2008-03-21 21:51

Already in the server

CAS_117 · Post by **CAS_117** » 2008-03-21 21:52

I'm in man.

Post by **Katarn** » 2008-03-21 21:56

I've CTD'd twice already.

Post by **GeZe** » 2008-03-21 22:15

This was tried before, and the server just crashed when the 65 person tried to join.

I am assuming you guys are trying with a modified server executable?

That is what they tried, and it turns out it was hard coded into the client as well, so you would need to modify the client executable as well and distribute it.

ArmedDrunk&Angry · Post by **ArmedDrunk&Angry** » 2008-03-21 22:15

CTD 2x as well
Good luck

Post by **Masaq** » 2008-03-21 22:31

Epoch had problems getting in too.

Post by **Rico** » 2008-03-21 22:39

58 so far... keep coming

Post by **Deadfast** » 2008-03-21 22:48

You have failed to connect. Please check your network connection(s) and try again

As a 65th player...

In the other words - it doesn't work

zangoo · Post by **zangoo** » 2008-03-21 22:51

yha i was 65th as my clan mates told me but i just got a error.

blud · Post by **blud** » 2008-03-21 22:53

Yup, I also tried to join as a 65th, and it does start to try to join (it doesn't say it's full) but then after a few seconds an error box comes up saying "You have failed to connect. Please check your network connection(s) and try again.

Post by **Mosquill** » 2008-03-21 22:53

So why kashan desert? I thought only dragon valley is configured for 128 players.

Post by **PARAMEDIC.CA** » 2008-03-21 22:54

[R-DEV]Katarn wrote:I've CTD'd twice already.

indeed.... I have evidence suggesting otherwise

scottp05156 · Post by **scottp05156** » 2008-03-21 22:55

[R-CON]GeZe wrote:This was tried before, and the server just crashed when the 65 person tried to join.

I am assuming you guys are trying with a modified server executable?

That is what they tried, and it turns out it was hard coded into the client as well, so you would need to modify the client executable as well and distribute it.

No you are assuming wrong! We didn't touch the .exe, We need to try the same thing client side. There is no need to .hex edit the server .exe you need to fool it.

Post by **bosco_** » 2008-03-21 22:55

Doesnt really surprise me.

Eddiereyes909 · Post by **Eddiereyes909** » 2008-03-21 22:56

well, it was worth the shot, if you can get it to work scott i shall name my first child after you.

Post by **Deadfast** » 2008-03-21 22:57

So sad it didn't work out :-/