land warrior system?

[kf_reaper]

see that we are going to be getting the stryker. will the US get the land warrior system. they are using it in the field along side with the stryker. well the stryker is apart of the land warrior system.

[OkitaMakoto]

Nope, sorry to rain on your parade...

My reasoning, for what its worth[not much] is that it'd be far too much work/coding/modeling/texturing/hardcoded-breaking for one faction.

[charliegrs]

oh god lets please not turn this mod into GRAW

[CodeRedFox]

Title change to reflect content

[kf_reaper]

there 1 little thing that will put it toward the land warrior. the min map.


http://video.google.com/videosearch?cli ... =N&tab=wv#

[kf_reaper]

come to think of it PR did have the land warrior but diva's took it out

[Conman51]

land warrior..usless......more weight added to a soldier and too much info...and too much money...and doesnt stop a bullet better than anything else we got..i think teh army is getting to high tech......i personally dont see it usefull in the real world...so i dont see it usefull for pr

[kf_reaper]

land warrior..usless......more weight added to a soldier and too much info...and too much money...and doesnt stop a bullet better than anything else we got..i think teh army is getting to high tech......i personally dont see it usefull in the real world...so i dont see it usefull for pr

it help to keep you from shoting at your own people. it helps the commander know what is going on in the battle field live up to date. it helps the troops know ware they are at ware there support is at and ware there target is at. and if there looking for someone the troops on the ground can send a pic on the person/'s that they have to see if this is the guy there looking for. and thats just for the troops. there the stryker, and new paladin. ware the crew does not even need to do anything to have it do a fire mission. the commander tells the "tank" not the crew to fire and the paladin auto load aims and fires.

the landware system is a network battle field command system. even the new JSF is networked. hell it does not really need the polite,
oh and there a new system that's starting field testing ware an ah-64 apache is able to remote control and MH-6 little bird. over an network. oh and that little bird does not need the apache to fly or do its missions.

so land warrior systems and systems alike are needed. its save your people live and kill your enemy. if you don't know what is going on in the battle field then you commands that you give people are less affective and your more likely to get you men killed.

for someone that says that they went to military school for 3 years you should know this.

[Conman51]

pleez...since teh army got their new stryker they still have more casualties than the marines(saw it on teh news a couple months ago)..now im not starting a marine vs. army thread but really the technology isnt helping...like your going to need all this tech stuff in a fire fight..and teh comunicatioon point taht you were talking about..it takes discipline not technology...yea less ppl on the field and more robots is betetr than loosing lives..but there are certain things ppl can do that bots cant...when was the last time you saw that robot w/ teh m 249 on its unjam the gun???..waht happens when this stuff breaks??/..a soldier has to rely on his training now...and all this land warrior stuff he carries now is usless weight...ever heard of a EMP???..yea America probally isnt the only country who has them...hell u could probbaly throw a magnet at one of those land warriors and his microchips would fry

and have you thought about the MONEY!!!!!..America is in depbt by like a SHi* ton.....honestly you can get the same results as the land warrior system w/ good training

[markonymous]

land warrior..usless......more weight added to a soldier and too much info...and too much money...and doesnt stop a bullet better than anything else we got..i think teh army is getting to high tech......i personally dont see it usefull in the real world...so i dont see it usefull for pr

i dont get why it weighs so much... its basically the same thing as any modern smartphone... GPS,camera etc etc so just give all the soldiers a smartphone put the camera on the weapon give them a HUD and you're done

[kf_reaper]

i was not just talking about the Stryker there more to an network Battle system then that.
take a look at the navy. the carrier is able to control all of the weapon systems on all of its escort ships. even the new fighters that the US is going to start using don't need people to fly them. they to can be controlled by the carrier. all you need are the guys to full them and load them and fix them. but in reality they will be relapsed by a machines.

more and more every day we will see network battle systems, using machines, AI and small amouts of people fighting.

even the army is working on an unmanned fighting machines that takes orders and go out and does it. it does need some on to RC out to the field and shot it. it does it all on its own with an AI. and if it runs into a big probelm like a tank,apc ext it will ask for support. and let the commander know ware it is at.

well i know an way for the US to make money. hear it is "STOP SENDING OUR FOOD OVER SEAS" we feed the world so if we stop sending out food. the price of food out side on the US go up. and well some people will die because of it. but we many money off of selling small amout of food for over high price.

and they are machines that fix machines

don't underestimate that man can to with machines and computers

[Conman51]

well i know an way for the US to make money. hear it is "STOP SENDING OUR FOOD OVER SEAS" we feed the world so if we stop sending out food. the price of food out side on the US go up. and well some people will die because of it. but we many money off of selling small amout of food for over high price.

umm..from waht i rember other countries helped out during Katrina...and yea thats really smart dont use money to grow food and send food to starving people but use the money on systems that help us kill better...

i see what has become of our society


srry dude...im liek a happie in the sence of helping people and preventing war...but when it comes to war...rely on your training not the technology


im just against land warrior in PR and real life......and pr is based in the near future...not where every army soldier will get his land warrior system...and yea i dont want it to become GRAW.

and really do we need so much techigy to fight third world countries!?!?!?..its goona be kinda sad if we NEED so much technology to beat people living in mud houses....its a bit over kil in my opinion

[IAJTHOMAS]

and really do we need so much techigy to fight third world countries!?!?!?..its goona be kinda sad if we NEED so much technology to beat people living in mud houses....its a bit over kil in my opinion

Yeah, we should risk real soldiers lives instead, give them a sporting chance. ??: Do you know what is kinda sad? A nice new shiney coffin with a flag drapped over it. Anything that that helps save the lives if soldiers is worth persuing.

[Conman51]

yea i agree w/ taht..its just i dont think Amercia has the money or will have the money any time soon to buy all this....so it should not be in PR


if America had enough money sure buy it!!!!1...but I dont think it will make a diffrence.....like your really going to text your commander "we got hit by a ambush!!!!"

we shouldnt be spending money on computers taht let your hearing increase (what happens when a grenade goes off next to you and u have the volume turned way up...your ears pop)

but we should be spending money on reaserching better body armor

[R.J.Travis]

Conman51=US= i disagree with you not every solider is given one only there squad leader and yes he would text he was ambushed and ask for support if he was not all ready dead we truly don't need money theres a little thing called "build it for free or we export you out of the USA" lol don't quote me on that lol

[ralfidude]

lol, i can imagine the wars of the future where the enemy throws magnets at the soldiers instead of rocks to disrupt their high tech gadgets.

[Hotrod525]

Land Warrior system is far from complete, and far from active in field. To be honest, i think this system is ****.. like Conman said, it give to much info to the soldiers adding confusion on an already stressfull situation, worth to much and it dosent make any difference.


Lets run 15 miles whit this then try to shoot streigth whit that, and is not really discreet

[Conman51]

Conman51=US= i disagree with you not every solider is given one only there squad leader and yes he would text he was ambushed and ask for support if he was not all ready dead we truly don't need money theres a little thing called "build it for free or we export you out of the USA" lol don't quote me on that lol

well i never got the part about only squad leaders getting it..idk if thats true..it thought it was every soldier....and its not going to be built for free...nothing is built for free


the technology is more of a distarction than a help

and whats w/ the stoopid computer screen in front of your eye....u only can fight with one eye!!!! ....

and when fighting insurgets and you get ambushed all this knowing where your enemy is wont help y???...because the govt. satalites dont know whos good or bad...they dont know about the guy on the street who has a AK hidden in a dead camel!!!!

maybe if we were fighting a organized big army the govt. can track enem troop movments and supplies...but now in Iraq/ Afghan its not going to help

[EOD_Security-2252]

It's not even a fact that Land Warrior will be used yet. Also, to remark about the Army having more casualities than Marines, it's not Stryker's fault, Marines are just more hardcore.

[Scot]

Sorry but whenever people talk about machines etc doing stuff for us, I think of Terminator and Stealth. Sorry but its all I can think of!