Project Reality Forums

Lots of people have been suggestign and hoping for a TOW to be a deployable Firebase asset but since it would most likely become a µltr4 1337 v3h1cl3 pwn3r im suggesting for 1 stationary HAT weapon to be deployed whit Firebases like a 50.cal or a AA placement.

The Skin and other characteristics would be simular to any other HAT missile launcher on the kit just that it wouldnt be mobile and have a ammo count of perhaps 2-3 missiles.

Stationary anti tank cannons for the OPFOR?

What's the difference between this and a deployable TOW launcher?

arjan wrote:anti tank cannons for the militia?

Wouldn't that be too cool?

Offcourse not you silly ops:

Stationary Javelin for the BLUFOR?

Zrix wrote:deployable TOW launcher

is there one in game??????

It would be great to have some deployable HATs on a building, so you can shoot tanks on his top side

goguapsy wrote:is there one in game??????

No!!!!!!!!


But if I understand the OP correctly, he wants a deployable stationary HAT launcher, because a deployable stationary TOW would be overpowered.
I just don't see the difference here.

can you get a tripod for the SRAW or the Javelin?(ofc the javelin probably won't be used) but i know you can have a Tripod for the ERYX and the MILAN.

arjan wrote:Stationary anti tank cannons for the OPFOR?

or a recoilless on a tripod with scope?

Hitman.2.5 wrote:can you get a tripod for the SRAW or the Javelin?(ofc the javelin probably won't be used) but i know you can have a Tripod for the ERYX and the MILAN

The UK adopted a proprietary tripod for their Javelin CLUs. The US, to my knowledge, has not, but we are now fielding the same CLU (Block 1 / M98A2). Maybe it includes points for attachment to a tripod.

Zrix wrote:What's the difference between this and a deployable TOW launcher?

Your'e making a good point there Zrix, i guess i didn't think of that too much at the first time ops:

Maby just give it one spare missile or something? any ideas?

HellDuke wrote:I think I've actually seen a TOW with firebases a few times... I believe we had one when we fortifed the Mosque flag on Muttrah... That was quite a while back (in the earlyer version of Muttrah)

Lets just stay outta the deployable TOW so the thread wont be locked as a re-sugestion

there might only be two hats out there on the battlefield but most of them are already at firebases firing away at tanks. its a big battlefield, but you seem to run into guys with hats almost too easily. I dont agree with this idea.

Zrix wrote:What's the difference between this and a deployable TOW launcher?

Thats its less powerful. I think a TOW, or a Kornet just packs a too big punch, so I agree with rambo93 here. Put stationary eryx'es, javelins, and PF98's around FOB's.

[R-DEV]Eddie Baker wrote:The UK adopted a proprietary tripod for their Javelin CLUs. The US, to my knowledge, has not, but we are now fielding the same CLU (Block 1 / M98A2). Maybe it includes points for attachment to a tripod.

Ahhh nice thnx for the info

The problem is that for this suggestion to get in game someone needs to make new models... If a TOW was used then someone could just take the sandbag base of the AA emplacement and add the TOW as a child (i think ) this means no new models and a lot less work for the person who takes the task on.

XxX_HangMan_XxX wrote:The problem is that for this suggestion to get in game someone needs to make new models... If a TOW was used then someone could just take the sandbag base of the AA emplacement and add the TOW as a child (i think ) this means no new models and a lot less work for the person who takes the task on.

Well we allrdy have skins for all the hats, all that would be required is simply the skin from a hat and make it lying on the ground

rampo93(FIN) wrote:Well we allrdy have skins for all the hats, all that would be required is simply the skin from a hat and make it lying on the ground

I dont think we can edit the HAT models, because they are Dice's models.