0.9: past predictions

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
hobbnob
Posts: 997
Joined: 2009-05-12 18:23

0.9: past predictions

Post by hobbnob »

Hi i'm new to the forums but i've been on the training servers for a while, great mod. Straight to the point, whilst looking through the forums i found a forum for a chinook that was started in 2008 and predicted for release in 0.9. I was wondering if this and other "old" developments have still been remembered and completed, thanks in advance, hobbnob
rampo
Posts: 2914
Joined: 2009-02-10 12:48

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by rampo »

gas104 wrote:We KNOW its going to be in 0.9 lololol
He was asking for any other stuff to be added in 0.9


Which is something to just patiently waiting for
Image
hobbnob
Posts: 997
Joined: 2009-05-12 18:23

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by hobbnob »

k thanks for the fast replies, certainly eased my worries of no chinook ;)
rampo
Posts: 2914
Joined: 2009-02-10 12:48

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by rampo »

hobbnob wrote:k thanks for the fast replies, certainly eased my worries of no chinook ;)
Ye that has been pretty much confirmed but as for maps on which to use it... can't think of any other than qinling
Image
Rissien
Posts: 2661
Joined: 2008-11-07 22:40

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by Rissien »

Given the upcoming release to possibly before the end of the month *as per the latest Highlight Reel if nothing causes problem* Im sure we can expect a changelog in the coming future.
Image
MA3-USN Former

クラナド ァフターストーリー
hobbnob
Posts: 997
Joined: 2009-05-12 18:23

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by hobbnob »

would be "fitting" if you know what i mean for it to be on al basrah, but the lack of decent landing areas inside the main town would make deployment impractical and would put pilots off wanting to fly it because of it's size. If there was a map similar to kashan with the british then it would work, but then it's just another map made to accomodate a single helicopter, which is a bit unneccesary.
Gore
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2491
Joined: 2008-02-15 21:39

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by Gore »

hobbnob wrote:would be "fitting" if you know what i mean for it to be on al basrah, but the lack of decent landing areas inside the main town would make deployment impractical and would put pilots off wanting to fly it because of it's size.

That's why the devs are working on fastropes ;-)
Xbrad150X
Posts: 105
Joined: 2009-12-10 18:49

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by Xbrad150X »

GoreZiad wrote:That's why the devs are working on fastropes ;-)
i wish


possiable the L85A2 upgrade?
hobbnob
Posts: 997
Joined: 2009-05-12 18:23

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by hobbnob »

fastropes would be good but unrealistic seeing as they are not commonly used on chinooks, rather on blackhawks. Another thing i fear will be the chinooks brownout. for people unfamiliar with this, its where pilots trying to land on desert terrain the huge rotor wash causes the pilot visibility to flatline if they dont flare. yes a chinook would be awesome though, i have no doubt the devs will make all well by the time of release.
supahpingi
Posts: 1921
Joined: 2007-05-29 14:10

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by supahpingi »

rampo93(FIN) wrote:Ye that has been pretty much confirmed but as for maps on which to use it... can't think of any other than qinling
Afaik,the chinook should be comming in with sangin,and sangin probably isnt in .9,so i dont think teh chinook will be comming in .9.

Proof me wrong tough
rampo
Posts: 2914
Joined: 2009-02-10 12:48

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by rampo »

supahpingi wrote:Afaik,the chinook should be comming in with sangin,and sangin probably isnt in .9,so i dont think teh chinook will be comming in .9.

Proof me wrong tough
From what iv'e been reading the chinook is pretty much ready for 0.9 But ofcourse i have no official source on this
Image
devildog279
Posts: 22
Joined: 2009-06-22 00:47

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by devildog279 »

hobbnob wrote:fastropes would be good but unrealistic seeing as they are not commonly used on chinooks, rather on blackhawks.
False, The USMC specifically MSOB only fastrope from chinooks. They do not use blackhawks. If they need a smaller chopper they use the sea knight.

But yeah, Sangin is confirmed not in .9 but I dunno about the chinook.
Drunkenup
Posts: 786
Joined: 2009-03-16 20:53

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by Drunkenup »

devildog279 wrote:False, The USMC specifically MSOB only fastrope from chinooks. They do not use blackhawks. If they need a smaller chopper they use the sea knight.

But yeah, Sangin is confirmed not in .9 but I dunno about the chinook.
Marines, nor the Navy even have touched a Chinook. Unless say they they're doing a joint op or something. But even considering that possibility, its not right to say they use the CH-47.

Considering that there are some ingame screens of the Chinook, it should be in pretty darn soon. I just hope its coming for the U.S. Army too to replace the problematic Blackhawk.
Drunkenup
Posts: 786
Joined: 2009-03-16 20:53

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by Drunkenup »

hobbnob wrote:fastropes would be good but unrealistic seeing as they are not commonly used on chinooks, rather on blackhawks. Another thing i fear will be the chinooks brownout. for people unfamiliar with this, its where pilots trying to land on desert terrain the huge rotor wash causes the pilot visibility to flatline if they dont flare. yes a chinook would be awesome though, i have no doubt the devs will make all well by the time of release.
AFAIK, the amount of blast a helicopter will produce probably isn't controlled. If I'm not mistaken, a Littlebird will produce as much debris and wash as a Merlin. But I'm sure a little magic in BF2 Editor changes this.
Burton
Posts: 791
Joined: 2009-09-24 17:02

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by Burton »

As much as it pains me to say it, the DEVs have always said that the Chinook and Sangin will be released together - so if one's not ready (Sangin), I'd hedge my bets on not getting the Chinook either.
z0MbA
Posts: 231
Joined: 2008-08-11 23:24

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by z0MbA »

Anyone know any knews that i believe were made/posted by matrox back in 2008? They looked really interesting and would like to see how they would effect gameplay. They work great in FH2
Lan
Posts: 358
Joined: 2008-10-26 02:15

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by Lan »

I love chinooks as much as the next person but not too bothered about a release in the game, a huge slow moving target isnt something i would like to be transported in. In game that is.
AfterDune
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17094
Joined: 2007-02-08 07:19

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by AfterDune »

Lan wrote:I love chinooks as much as the next person but not too bothered about a release in the game, a huge slow moving target isnt something i would like to be transported in. In game that is.
You do realize Chinooks are faster than Apaches for example?
Image
Trooper909
Posts: 2529
Joined: 2009-02-26 03:02

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by Trooper909 »

[R-DEV]AfterDune wrote:You do realize Chinooks are faster than Apaches for example?


indeed.
theres a vid of the chinnok doing all kinds of crazy stunts and fast flying on these forums somwere.its kinda like a fat dude thats realy agile.never to be underestimated.
hobbnob
Posts: 997
Joined: 2009-05-12 18:23

Re: 0.9: past predictions

Post by hobbnob »

i doubt it will come out for US because it is not used by the regular us army. The single in game pic i've seen of it was in the UN livery, so that might mean something.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”