Currently, the new LAV-25 reticule is done wrong. It's zeroed at the beginning of the drop ladder, instead of boresight indicated by reticule.
Can this be changed?
Revising LAV-25 Reticule
-
mangeface
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: 2009-12-13 09:56
Re: Revising LAV-25 Reticule
I would agree, but you didn't throw any source in here. Maybe Hotrod525 can be of good information for this, as I believe I've read he drives LAVs in the Canadian Armed Forces.
-
Hotrod525
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: 2006-12-10 13:28
Re: Revising LAV-25 Reticule
Here a LAV25 reticule, but, you must keep in mind, USMC may use an other one :
Thermal/NV view and Day view :
Thermal/NV view and Day view :
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

-
Hunt3r
- Posts: 1573
- Joined: 2009-04-24 22:09
Re: Revising LAV-25 Reticule
The Reticule is fine, imo, but what really needs changing is the zero point. The cross on the top is what it should be zeroed to, not the 400 meter drop marks.

Note the cross, which in this case, should be the zero point. The zero point is on the beginning of the drop ladder.

Note the cross, which in this case, should be the zero point. The zero point is on the beginning of the drop ladder.
Last edited by Hunt3r on 2010-04-17 00:19, edited 2 times in total.

