will there be aircraft carriers beside the USS essex??? always wonderd?
Thread title too Vague:
"Carrier" doesn't give enough info on what the thread is actually about.
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-14 14:56
by supahpingi
Wich Essex do you mean?
CV-9, an Essex class aircraft carrier from world war two that still operated during the 60's,not in south east asia however.
LHD-2, an Wasp-class amphibious assault ship that went into service in 1992 (currently featured in bf2 and PR)
Wich cant have seen possibly seen action during the vietnam conflict.
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-14 15:37
by mezlay2
yes i mean the lhd-2 thats the essex right? So is it possible for the bf2 engine to get another carrier like the uss kity hawk cv-63 or uss enterprise cvn-65
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-14 15:40
by gazzthompson
The DEVs could make any carrier they wanted, its just it would take a *long* time for very little gain.
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-14 21:23
by mezlay2
that ain't a problem right?
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-14 22:15
by Jigsaw
mezlay2 wrote:that ain't a problem right?
No, no problem at all. Wanna do it?
Thanks
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-14 22:35
by NyteMyre
Something like that?
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-14 22:37
by BloodBane611
mezlay2 wrote:that ain't a problem right?
Creating a carrier would be hundreds of hours of work to get it done at any acceptable quality level, the likelihood of it happening is somewhere very near 0
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-15 05:16
by Imchicken1
NyteMyre wrote:
Something like that?
I would do smthin im not allowed to say on the forums
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-15 13:04
by SlLeNceR
PR/VIETNAM needs a carrier! I wanna see F18s being launched and the sea knight taking off with USMC, hook landings! Ahhhh!
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-15 13:56
by Hitman.2.5
SlLeNceR wrote:PR/VIETNAM needs a carrier! I wanna see F18s being launched and the sea knight taking off with USMC, hook landings! Ahhhh!
ITS JUST A CRYING SHAME! THAT THE F-18 wasn't in service back in vietnam!
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-19 17:36
by mezlay2
[R-MOD]BloodBane611 wrote:Creating a carrier would be hundreds of hours of work to get it done at any acceptable quality level, the likelihood of it happening is somewhere very near 0
Hitman.2.5 wrote:ITS JUST A CRYING SHAME! THAT THE F-18 wasn't in service back in vietnam!
The F-18 was a piece of **** next to the far more capable and epic F-14 until the massive upgrade and redesign, and personally I think that if they spent the same amount to redesign the F-14, they'd have yet another superior aircraft.
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-19 22:55
by bloodthirsty_viking
i thought someone allready made a new carrier...
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-20 10:10
by supahpingi
mezlay2 wrote:how long took it to make this ship??
And bloodthirsty,afaik one the brits made a brit landing ship.
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-24 17:10
by mezlay2
supahpingi wrote:Boot up 3dsmax and see for yourself.
im not a modler so i dont use 3ds max
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-24 17:51
by dtacs
mezlay2 wrote:im not a modler so i dont use 3ds max
Then don't make suggestions for aircraft carriers/ships that:
A) Don't even fit into the timeframe of PRV;
B) Take an incredible amount of work to put in to.
I don't say pancakes are awesome then ask you to cook me a massive stack.
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-24 19:51
by usmcguy
Tirak wrote:The F-18 was a piece of **** next to the far more capable and epic F-14 until the massive upgrade and redesign, and personally I think that if they spent the same amount to redesign the F-14, they'd have yet another superior aircraft.
I dont know if i'd say that..the F-14 was designed mainly for air-air but still had some air-ground capabilities while the F-18 was very capable to own in both but wasn't really as legendary.
Re: Carrier
Posted: 2010-09-24 21:46
by Gandler
I think this would be awesome, especially if they were drivable.
Re: carrier
Posted: 2010-09-27 16:41
by mezlay2
dtacs wrote:Then don't make suggestions for aircraft carriers/ships that:
A) Don't even fit into the timeframe of PRV;
B) Take an incredible amount of work to put in to.
I don't say pancakes are awesome then ask you to cook me a massive stack.
i didnt make a suggest for a carrier that doesnt fit in PRV timeframe i just dont want the essex in PRV because that wouldnt make any sense