NautaFIN wrote:What about Canadian forces faction then?
the diemaco series don't look or behave like m16's you infidel!
(yes dutchfor uses 'em too
)
First, a hypothetical ANA really wouldn't bring any unique weapons or vehicles to the table (something I think all Project Reality's faction's should do) and thus would be a mere rehash of existing content-snip-
I have to disagree to this, sure in terms of assets, no it isn't entirely new, you'll be having more ak's, rpg's and possibly in the future some ill-maintained m16's, backed up largely by technicals.
the good thing about having ANA comes with the gameplay:
the ANA is ill-equiped and unless supported by american(or other ISAF) armor or air assets potentially identical to their foes. this means AAS with 2 underequiped factions, e.g. in terms of heavy assets, effective range (almost ironsights only!) and perhaps also the medical situation. I find this alot more interesting than the alternative: MEC vs. insurgents (though I'd like to see that as well
) Though I guess insurgency will be impossible with an ANA faction, due to too heavy casualties for the blufor, AAS might become even more intense.
but we might want to see how that other old-fashioned and slightly under-equipped conventional faction will work out: the union africaine which the ARF comfac makes.
