
So, do you really want a BMP-3 on Muttrah?
Dont you try to start a flame war now, because what your saying is RediculesEmnyron wrote:It wont be on muttra becuse of the NWACHNT issue. (Non-Western Armies Cant Have Nice Things)
Yes it is from BF2 Special Forces, another thing that needs to be fixed is the Interior, it looks weird with doors on both sides of it.KingLorre wrote:Dont you try to start a flame war now, because what your saying is Redicules
and i tought our BMP3 was from special forces? and i tought it did float in that, so it can hopefully be fixed.
go make a map, give the MEC/PLA nice things and if the map is good enough it'll get in to PR.Emnyron wrote:It wont be on muttra becuse of the NWACHNT issue. (Non-Western Armies Cant Have Nice Things)
Why is this a silly comment, in fact it isn't. Of course the mapper is deciding what gets on the map and what not and the DEV-Team is deciding what gets into the mod, and if the decision is that US/UK will get the good stuff and the others not there is a NWACHNT-Issue. (nice abbreviation btwDr2B Rudd wrote:go make a map, give the MEC/PLA nice things and if the map is good enough it'll get in to PR.
cuz generally afaik teh mapper gets to choose what goes on the map.
Very silly comment anyway.
If you put the work in to fixing teh BMP for water, then it'll get on a water map.
Jeez.
"no scopes on LMG's for MEC/PLA" - they get a 4x zoom which IMO is better (though only a place holder) because of the bigger field of view.Cpt.Kawakowitsch wrote:Why is this a silly comment, in fact it isn't. Of course the mapper is deciding what gets on the map and what not and the DEV-Team is deciding what gets into the mod, and if the decision is that US/UK will get the good stuff and the others not there is a NWACHNT-Issue. (nice abbreviation btw) It was and it is that the US/UK armies are getting all nice toys and the rest are left behind. E.g. no fast transport choppers for MEC/PLA, no scopes on the LMGs for MEC/PLA, crappy APC (gun overheats in two seconds and no protection for the gunner) for PLA on .86, none guideable HAT for PLA, no up-armoured transport vehicles with MG, like the Hummvee, for MEC/PLA etc... and don't tell me that those factions aren't capable of having such stuff IRL, thats simply not true. And don't say something like: "Go and make one", because that would make every critical comment on the mod obsolete.
god i hope this is a joke, it was amazingly obvious that all that shizz going on in the video was a bug..JDMT wrote:So, do you really want a BMP-3 on Muttrah?
I guess, you are one of those who teamswitches because you can't be a US Marine.crAck_sh0t wrote:The Western factions equipment is superior in real life and as such should be in the game also.
I was just showing it off...Good point, useless thread lock it please![R-COM]Cheditor wrote:JDMT what was the point of this thread may i ask? It looks like your reporting a bug but that belongs in the Bug section of the forums and if you were asking if it was bugged then you were already told in your other BMP-3 thread that it was bugged.
That is a lie and you know it. the only reason it seems that way is because the US are one of the few countries that are constantly showing off their stuff. which is why everyone knows of their equipment. it's like TV shows and movies, everyone thinks the mainstream shows are better but that's cause they get more funding for advertising. but we all know that those large well funded projects are all **** these days they still look amazing in all the add campaigns. If you were to do some actual research on say China or Israel's military equipment you will find that they have the world's best equipment, china is questionable but ISrael definetly has equipment that far out performs any western counterpart.crAck_sh0t wrote:The Western factions equipment is superior in real life and as such should be in the game also.