Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
[=TC=]nuetron
Posts: 358
Joined: 2007-06-20 08:00

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by [=TC=]nuetron »

Alright. Ya, I see what you mean. Well I don't think the APC should explode in a fireball like it does- that's the kicker that got me questioning it.
"There is no such thing as WAR-FAIR" -me
General Fuct
Posts: 85
Joined: 2007-10-02 07:27

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by General Fuct »

AquaticPenguin wrote:I quite like this idea, do the same thing to the .50s as was done to the LMGs - Don't make them less accurate, but make them shake some more. Not sure on the realism of it, but it might stop some players from charging up to the front and then trying to snipe people 50m away with the .50.
Don't get me wrong a M2 on a remote weapon station will put the first two rounds dead on at close to 1km...the weapon is fairly accurate in small bursts, single shots even more so.

also those light armored vehicles unfortunately majority of them would not stand up to a sustained .50 cal attack, the Armour is just not thick in enough on majority of the vehicle (obviously plate thickness on different parts of the vehicle would chance penetration rates).
General Fuct - - Since 0.5J
hartbilt
Posts: 113
Joined: 2010-02-17 06:26

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by hartbilt »

Final Word

The .50 caliber round is optimized for penetration at long ranges (about 875 yards, or 800 meters). For hard targets, .50 caliber penetration is affected by obliquity and range.

The .50 caliber round can penetrate all of the commonly found urban barriers except a sand-filled 55-gallon drum.

Continued and concentrated machine gun fire can breach most typical urban walls. Such fire cannot breach thick reinforced concrete structures or dense natural stone walls. Internal walls, partitions, plaster, floors, ceilings, common office furniture, home appliances, and bedding can be easily penetrated by .50 caliber rounds.

Number of rounds needed to penetrate a reinforced concrete wall at 25° obliquity.
Wall Thickness / 109 yd (100 m) Range / 219 yd (200 m) Range
2 ft (0.6 m) /300 rounds / 1,200 rounds
3 ft (0.9 m) /450 rounds / 1,800 rounds
4 ft (1.2 m) /600 rounds / 2,400 rounds


Penetration capabilities of a single .50 caliber M2 AP round fired from a 45-inch barrel.
Range / Armor Plate (homogeneous) / Armor Plate (face-hardened) Sand /Clay

219 yd (200 m) 1.0 in (25.4 mm) 0.9 in (22.9 mm) 14 in (355.6 mm) 28 in (711.2 mm)
656 yd (600 m) 0.7 in (17.8 mm) 0.5 in (12.7 mm) 12 in (304.8 mm) 27 in (685.8 mm)
1,640 yd (1,500 m) 0.3 in (7.6 mm) 0.2 in (5.1 mm) 6 in (152.4 mm) 21 in (533.4 mm)


Penetration capabilities of a single .50 caliber M2 Ball round fired from a 45-inch barrel.
Range / Sand / Clay / Concrete

219 yd (200 m) 14 in (355.6 mm) * 28 in (711.2 mm) * 2 in (50.8 mm)

656 yd (600 m) 12 in (304.8 mm)* 26 in (660.4 mm)* 1 in (25.4 mm)

1,640 yd (1,500 m) 6 in (152.4 mm)* 21 in (533.4 mm)* 1 in (25.4 mm)


source:
TM 43-0001-27: Army Ammunition Data Sheets For Small Caliber Ammunition.
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by Rhino »

[R-CON]DankE_SPB wrote:but there are also parts, where it will do nothing and just go through, so, since we cant have realistic mobility kill/damage values depending on material/importance of area, the system where it lasts longer but blows up in the end seems to be the only way
Ye we where talking about this in a meeting yesterday, main problem might be that we would possibly have to remodel all the cols of the vBF2 choppers etc from scratch which would take a bit to do.

'[=TC= wrote:nuetron;1281938']Alright. Ya, I see what you mean. Well I don't think the APC should explode in a fireball like it does- that's the kicker that got me questioning it.
We can only have one explosion effect for any type of vehicle/dest object for w/e destroys it. We can't unfortunately only have it blow up when it takes a large impact to its magazine etc :p
Image
alberto_di_gio
Posts: 534
Joined: 2009-12-11 09:47

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by alberto_di_gio »

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote: We can only have one explosion effect for any type of vehicle/dest object for w/e destroys it. We can't unfortunately only have it blow up when it takes a large impact to its magazine etc :p
how about it does not explode at all if hit with .50. It may smokes out, stops moving and stay ruined there for good? Waiting either to be repaired or totally exploded by an rpg/chopper/c4 or what ever.
Image
AgentMongoose
Posts: 265
Joined: 2008-09-02 19:03

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by AgentMongoose »

alberto_di_gio wrote:how about it does not explode at all if hit with .50. It may smokes out, stops moving and stay ruined there for good? Waiting either to be repaired or totally exploded by an rpg/chopper/c4 or what ever.
Sadly bf2 can't work that way
killonsight95
Posts: 2123
Joined: 2009-03-22 13:06

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by killonsight95 »

AgentMongoose wrote:Sadly bf2 can't work that way
yeah it can... we've got it already, just keep it imbolilised so in other words its takes a lot of hit point to get it from imobile to destroyed? i dunno its sounds odd to me
Image
ComradeHX
Posts: 3294
Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by ComradeHX »

killonsight95 wrote:the armour in made of 5083 Aluminum and is 1.5 inches thick or about 3.8 cm
source:
APC M113

i'm pretty sure 50.cal bullets can penitrate 3.8 cm of 5083 aluminum armour

but i'm also sure that most helicopters use the same armour
+1

50 cal should pwn that armour(seriously, a decently sized chunk of steel vs. aluminum...).
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by Outlawz7 »

AgentMongoose wrote:Sadly bf2 can't work that way
What he's talking about, can work, just remove the explosion effect and have the vehicle turn to wreck and start emitting smoke when its destroyed? Thought it would confuse most about if it's really destroyed at first.
Image
DeltaFart
Posts: 2409
Joined: 2008-02-12 20:36

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by DeltaFart »

I feel the techis are too accurate teh power is fine, but I mean the techis are used by untrained indiviudals ona bouncy mount, on whatI would say is a very bad mounting for a 50 cal, since that thing will be bouncing all over
I mean I can sit on a hill in some insurgency map, and take down apaches with teh damn thing, and I've done it once or twice too
"The Apache is heavily armored on all sides. Some areas are also surrounded by Kevlar soft armor for extra protection. The cockpit is protected by layers of reinforced armor and bulletproof glass. According to Boeing, every part of the helicopter can survive 12.7-mm rounds, and vital engine and rotor components can withstand 23-mm fire."
HowStuffWorks "Apache Armor"

When I can render an apache ineffective by a guy, who IRL would be hopped up on something serious, untrained in properly shooting a 50 Caliber machine gun, I dont see how tyhey can be portrayed as being that accurate
Hotrod525
Posts: 2215
Joined: 2006-12-10 13:28

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by Hotrod525 »

DeltaFart wrote:I feel the techis are too accurate teh power is fine, but I mean the techis are used by untrained indiviudals ona bouncy mount, on whatI would say is a very bad mounting for a 50 cal, since that thing will be bouncing all over
I mean I can sit on a hill in some insurgency map, and take down apaches with teh damn thing, and I've done it once or twice too
"The Apache is heavily armored on all sides. Some areas are also surrounded by Kevlar soft armor for extra protection. The cockpit is protected by layers of reinforced armor and bulletproof glass. According to Boeing, every part of the helicopter can survive 12.7-mm rounds, and vital engine and rotor components can withstand 23-mm fire."
HowStuffWorks "Apache Armor"

When I can render an apache ineffective by a guy, who IRL would be hopped up on something serious, untrained in properly shooting a 50 Caliber machine gun, I dont see how tyhey can be portrayed as being that accurate

Yeah i approve, AH64 would sustain a shit load of punishment, same as Chinook. But some other chopper like Little Bird will hit the dirt after a couple of round, so basicly, its a case by case situation :P

And for APC, M113 is not design to sustain .50 cal, i dont even known if Coyote [LAV25] would sustain it. Especialy since theyre is API .50 round...

Image
Image
TheOldBreed
Posts: 637
Joined: 2009-05-08 23:03

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by TheOldBreed »

all hail the .50 cal

in afghanistan (1980s) the muj were shooting down hinds with a 12.7mm, although from above.
TheOldBreed
Posts: 637
Joined: 2009-05-08 23:03

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by TheOldBreed »

adding to the Apache debate, in March 2003, when all those Apaches got the shit kicked out of them up near Baghdad, only 1 was brought down, the other 31 that were damaged made it back, despite what the Iraqis were throwing up in the sky. crazy sheeyit.
Pariel
Posts: 1584
Joined: 2008-01-29 23:41

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by Pariel »

DeltaFart wrote:I feel the techis are too accurate teh power is fine, but I mean the techis are used by untrained indiviudals ona bouncy mount, on whatI would say is a very bad mounting for a 50 cal, since that thing will be bouncing all over
I mean I can sit on a hill in some insurgency map, and take down apaches with teh damn thing, and I've done it once or twice too
"The Apache is heavily armored on all sides. Some areas are also surrounded by Kevlar soft armor for extra protection. The cockpit is protected by layers of reinforced armor and bulletproof glass. According to Boeing, every part of the helicopter can survive 12.7-mm rounds, and vital engine and rotor components can withstand 23-mm fire."
HowStuffWorks "Apache Armor"

When I can render an apache ineffective by a guy, who IRL would be hopped up on something serious, untrained in properly shooting a 50 Caliber machine gun, I dont see how tyhey can be portrayed as being that accurate
It can survive 12.7mm fire -- which is not the same as sustained 12.7mm fire. A couple dozen rounds will do serious damage to the helicopter, and aircraft are fragile things.

Furthermore, the armor requirements for most military aircraft are such that while the occupants may survive, often the aircraft will not. In game terms, having to return to base and be grounded for days or weeks due to damage is the same as being blown up.

Those Apaches TheOldBreed is talking about weren't taking anti-aircraft fire at distances under a kilometer. Distance is a significant factor even for bullets that large. Hence the reason Apaches use 30mm guns, rockets and missiles.
DeltaFart
Posts: 2409
Joined: 2008-02-12 20:36

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by DeltaFart »

I still feel drugged up insurgents shouldnt be as accurate as they are on the back of a post welded to a pick truck from the 60s
hartbilt
Posts: 113
Joined: 2010-02-17 06:26

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by hartbilt »

DeltaFart wrote:I still feel drugged up insurgents shouldnt be as accurate as they are on the back of a post welded to a pick truck from the 60s
I guess it would depend on their drug of choice, Khat or Opium. Pissed off on some khat, a man with a machine gun can do some damage.
ReadMenace
Posts: 2567
Joined: 2007-01-16 20:05

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by ReadMenace »

An Iraqi .50cal managed to penetrate a Bradley during Desert Storm. Undoubtedly a fluke.. But it is an aluminum hull.

-REad
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by Rudd »

Here is a question, so for instances when a 50cal can go through, but doesn't always, can't we just put a new projectile that gets fired like 1/10 bullets that does go through things, but the rest dont to simulate the probabilities.
Image
killonsight95
Posts: 2123
Joined: 2009-03-22 13:06

Re: Make .50 cals WAYYY less effective. seriously.

Post by killonsight95 »

'[R-CON wrote:Rudd;1282878']Here is a question, so for instances when a 50cal can go through, but doesn't always, can't we just put a new projectile that gets fired like 1/10 bullets that does go through things, but the rest dont to simulate the probabilities.
the problem with that is, when shooting at infantry
what if you miss 9/10 times and hit the 1/10 times and you keep doing that and it blows up with 3 hits
what if you hit it alot but that 1/10 bullet always just seems to miss
???
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”