0.9/0.91 general maps feedback

[rough77]

kashan: good as always, but nothing new (spawn points/flags etc.) - as suggested in another thread I'd change the factions.
jabal: same thing
russian maps: very well designed, very good gameplay! I still don't like these maps - cause the feeling when you play them... YUCK! foggy, cold, dirty (yeah, I'm a sunshine warrior :mrgreen
yamalia: perfect map!
lashkar valley: everytime this map shows up all players start asking for a mapchange. it's very nice,it's beautiful - but the gameplay is simply BORING cause this map is too huge! 64 humans in 16 km²...
asad khal: I've never seen a fight in the north of this map
beirut: perfect map, for me the best map in 0.9
insurgent city maps: karbala, al basra have the same problem like lashkar valley... too big
fallujah: superb map
gaza: I like it, but also here: most fights happen along the wall (near the IDF base), the battle tank is useless

isn't it possible to create more options for admins like 32/64 maps that change size (or death zones)?

what I don't get: why do the DEVs remove older maps?
ghost train! omg I'm missing that map
ejod desert: with a better balance it would have still been perfect!
why don't u let server admins or the players deceide what to play?

all the realistic stuff, all the sounds, graphics, medic system, ralley point system etc. have increased - but the gameplay hasn't, I think it's because of the new maps. I'm missing the FUN ??:

[goguapsy]

OK review, however I disagree with Karbala and Al Basrah being big... I actually think they are very good in size! (ie. no foot-QRFs and no migrations like in Silent Eagle when you don't have a transport).

[Kain888]

64 humans in 16 km²...

Lashkar is 2 km map so it's 4 km² not 16. And it's one of the most epic insurgency maps. ;]

And I disagree with most things you have written. So it's just matter of opinion.

I don't really understand idea of tank on Karbala though.