
Missing in Action (film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You just know it's going to be historically accurate.

hamburger hill was terribleFuzzySquirrel wrote:Platoon (1986)
Hamburger Hill (1987)
Full Metal Jacket (1987)
Good Morning Vietnam (1987)
Apocalypse Now (1979)
Casualties of war is not negative, It just shows the realities of war. The differences between men. I'd say Platoon was negative. Especially with the ending words "We fought ourselves" and friendly fire incidents.mo0nbuggy1 wrote:Casualties Of War.
Pretty good movie, pretty negative though.
I agree the storyline is quite average, but the Grimm and action they succeeded in recreating makes it interesting to watch from a military standpoint. You get caught up in the fight trying to think of a strategy like you we're there. It's really a soldiers movie. F the media and F the higher command chain. We're the best.sAueR115 wrote:hamburger hill was terrible

haha yeah, my flat mate saw it and he said it was just basically an excuse to create more and more gruesome deaths for US soldiersrushn wrote:I cant believe that they would have them there I actually did see part of that movie(reason: just to see how they would implement the black hawks but I ended up being bored from the beggining so decided to abort my mission
Its like having a huey in a WW2 movie
The DVD cover of 1968 has several Blackhawks, yes. The film itself has only one Huey in the opening scene, but the movie is still not believable or realistic on any scale. Eg. the US outpost is literally in the middle of the jungle, without a firezone cleared around it. It's supposedly hostile territory, but no sentries are posted. And so forth.rushn wrote:I cant believe that they would have them there I actually did see part of that movie(reason: just to see how they would implement the black hawks but I ended up being bored from the beggining so decided to abort my mission
Its like having a huey in a WW2 movie
This. It's a Vietnamsploitation movie that somehow got into the time machine and flew 20years into the future after the fad had passed. Though everything has to be put into perspective: it isn't that awful if you compare it to some of the cheesiest entries in the genre, such as hilariously bad Strike Commando. Or maybe it is.TheOldBreed wrote:haha yeah, my flat mate saw it and he said it was just basically an excuse to create more and more gruesome deaths for US soldiers
lol just by looking at the cover I'd never watch that movie."After APOCALYPSE NOW! and... PLATOON! Here comes..."Kelmola wrote:The DVD cover of 1968 has several Blackhawks, yes. The film itself has only one Huey in the opening scene, but the movie is still not believable or realistic on any scale. Eg. the US outpost is literally in the middle of the jungle, without a firezone cleared around it. It's supposedly hostile territory, but no sentries are posted. And so forth.
This. It's a Vietnamsploitation movie that somehow got into the time machine and flew 20years into the future after the fad had passed. Though everything has to be put into perspective: it isn't that awful if you compare it to some of the cheesiest entries in the genre, such as hilariously bad Strike Commando. Or maybe it is.
