CH-54A skycrane?
-
ZondaX15
- Posts: 147
- Joined: 2009-06-07 02:37
CH-54A skycrane?
just wondering if there will be any skyranes? it would be cool to have tanks dropped onto the field by a huge flying crane. just a thought.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
master of the templars
- Posts: 598
- Joined: 2007-06-26 21:37
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
The one thing i dislike about Vietnam era conflicts, all the hideous helicopter designs.
Make nukes, Not war
-
Maxfragg
- Posts: 2122
- Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
airlifting is possible but buggy, and without airlifting, this thing would be pretty pointless
-
Snazz
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: 2009-02-11 08:00
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Practicality > Aestheticsmaster of the templars wrote:The one thing i dislike about Vietnam era conflicts, all the hideous helicopter designs.
That said I like the look of most Vietnam era helicopters personally, a lot of which have been upgraded since and continue to serve (Chinook, Huey, Cobra, Stallion, Littlebird).
-
TheOldBreed
- Posts: 637
- Joined: 2009-05-08 23:03
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
to be fair, i can't see the skycrane being used a whole lot, in combat i mean. in 'nam, armour was used for things: base defence; search & destroy operations; route security; up North they were pretty decent at stopping border incursions. i'm guessing the skycrane was used to transport tanks that thad been immobilized "deep in the bush" (teehee) or vice versa back into it.
what i mean to say is, in the situations that PRV will give, they'll most likely be nothing more than infantry support or maybe at best be used for route security. in these situations, airlifting armour here, there and everywhere would pretty much be irrelevant.
sick suggestion though man
what i mean to say is, in the situations that PRV will give, they'll most likely be nothing more than infantry support or maybe at best be used for route security. in these situations, airlifting armour here, there and everywhere would pretty much be irrelevant.
sick suggestion though man
-
Adetter
- Posts: 604
- Joined: 2009-02-26 17:08
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Maybe because in Vietnam war was the first time helicopters was a part of the combat....
-
Hitman.2.5
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: 2008-03-21 20:54
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Back then it was called the "jolly Green Giant"Snazz wrote:Stallion
Sorry it wa the HH-53 super jolly...
Why would we need the sky crane I mean with choppers in the BF2 engine you can not lift stuff so what would be the point... Nice to have but not needed imo
Besides if it were possible I'd want a Droge drop Sheridan on a sled from a C-130 XD
This too would be nice to have but that wouldn't be necessary in PR:V:BF2 how ever if PR:A2 becomes successful which it will and they think about making PR:A2:V the possibilities would be awesome.
Last edited by Hitman.2.5 on 2010-04-18 16:28, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: error
Reason: error
Derpist
-
mangeface
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: 2009-12-13 09:56
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
You pretty much forgot the most important one of them. The CH-46 Sea Knight, a.k.a. the Phrog.Snazz wrote:Practicality > Aesthetics
That said I like the look of most Vietnam era helicopters personally, a lot of which have been upgraded since and continue to serve (Chinook, Huey, Cobra, Stallion, Littlebird).
Funny how pretty much most of them are USMC aircraft.
-
JohnnyTheIED
- Posts: 452
- Joined: 2009-01-01 20:13
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Anybody remember the Desert Combat AC-130 gunship? 
The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.
The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.

-
Sgt.BountyOrig
- Posts: 656
- Joined: 2009-02-22 18:12
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
I think its always had a back trap that worked (it does in DC now though anyway)
It might be better balanced if the BF2 version didnt have a tonna guns on the side.
Alternatively, that just makes it a faster, and probably less safer sky crane
It might be better balanced if the BF2 version didnt have a tonna guns on the side.
Alternatively, that just makes it a faster, and probably less safer sky crane
[NO] Bounty
-
Hitman.2.5
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: 2008-03-21 20:54
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Actually they were used a lot especially with the construction of a firebase they choppered in D7 dozersTheOldBreed wrote:to be fair, i can't see the skycrane being used a whole lot, in combat i mean. in 'nam, armour was used for things: base defence; search & destroy operations; route security; up North they were pretty decent at stopping border incursions. i'm guessing the skycrane was used to transport tanks that thad been immobilized "deep in the bush" (teehee) or vice versa back into it.
what i mean to say is, in the situations that PRV will give, they'll most likely be nothing more than infantry support or maybe at best be used for route security. in these situations, airlifting armour here, there and everywhere would pretty much be irrelevant.
sick suggestion though man

and Case Back hoe's

and small containers to be buried and made into command bunkers

but why would we need this?
Derpist
-
Smiddey723
- Posts: 901
- Joined: 2010-03-27 18:59
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
JohnnyTheIED wrote:Anybody remember the Desert Combat AC-130 gunship?
The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.
Funny you say this, i was looking at youtube videos of DC the other day and one of the comments was "What game is this, Project Reality?"
.:2p:.Smiddey
-
TheOldBreed
- Posts: 637
- Joined: 2009-05-08 23:03
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
aye, but i meant in combat situations.Hitman.2.5 wrote:Actually they were used a lot especially with the construction of a firebase they choppered in D7 dozers
but why would we need this?
-
Hitman.2.5
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: 2008-03-21 20:54
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Were tanks frequently air dropped by a sky crane into the field? or were they "MECivac'ing" them out of the field?
Last edited by Hitman.2.5 on 2010-04-24 11:37, edited 1 time in total.
Derpist
-
xatu miller
- Posts: 431
- Joined: 2008-05-01 12:38
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Possible in 1942 not BF2 sadly.JohnnyTheIED wrote:Anybody remember the Desert Combat AC-130 gunship?
The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.
"Intermolecular interactions in the flake's matrix could be weakened by the plasticizer [water], leading to the solubilization of some components, and to a decrease in mechanical integrity."
READ: Water makes cereal soggy.
-
pfhatoa
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 2009-08-27 19:26
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
A bit off topic but that is not true. The french army used armed helicopters in the Algerian War and U.S.A used some during the korean war.Adetter wrote:Maybe because in Vietnam war was the first time helicopters was a part of the combat....
Source: Armed helicopter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Yes I know it's wiki)
-
JAMES_AT_Battlefield
- Posts: 38
- Joined: 2010-04-07 15:43
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
yes i remember the AC-130JohnnyTheIED wrote:Anybody remember the Desert Combat AC-130 gunship?
The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.
-
Sniper77shot
- Posts: 509
- Joined: 2009-12-24 04:46

