CH-54A skycrane?

Suggestions from our community members.
ZondaX15
Posts: 147
Joined: 2009-06-07 02:37

CH-54A skycrane?

Post by ZondaX15 »

just wondering if there will be any skyranes? it would be cool to have tanks dropped onto the field by a huge flying crane. just a thought.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Adetter
Posts: 604
Joined: 2009-02-26 17:08

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by Adetter »

Hard to modell i guess.......
master of the templars
Posts: 598
Joined: 2007-06-26 21:37

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by master of the templars »

The one thing i dislike about Vietnam era conflicts, all the hideous helicopter designs.
Make nukes, Not war
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by Maxfragg »

airlifting is possible but buggy, and without airlifting, this thing would be pretty pointless
Snazz
Posts: 1504
Joined: 2009-02-11 08:00

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by Snazz »

master of the templars wrote:The one thing i dislike about Vietnam era conflicts, all the hideous helicopter designs.
Practicality > Aesthetics

That said I like the look of most Vietnam era helicopters personally, a lot of which have been upgraded since and continue to serve (Chinook, Huey, Cobra, Stallion, Littlebird).
TheOldBreed
Posts: 637
Joined: 2009-05-08 23:03

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by TheOldBreed »

to be fair, i can't see the skycrane being used a whole lot, in combat i mean. in 'nam, armour was used for things: base defence; search & destroy operations; route security; up North they were pretty decent at stopping border incursions. i'm guessing the skycrane was used to transport tanks that thad been immobilized "deep in the bush" (teehee) or vice versa back into it.
what i mean to say is, in the situations that PRV will give, they'll most likely be nothing more than infantry support or maybe at best be used for route security. in these situations, airlifting armour here, there and everywhere would pretty much be irrelevant.

sick suggestion though man
Adetter
Posts: 604
Joined: 2009-02-26 17:08

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by Adetter »

Maybe because in Vietnam war was the first time helicopters was a part of the combat....
Hitman.2.5
Posts: 1086
Joined: 2008-03-21 20:54

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by Hitman.2.5 »

Snazz wrote:Stallion
Back then it was called the "jolly Green Giant" :p
Sorry it wa the HH-53 super jolly...

Why would we need the sky crane I mean with choppers in the BF2 engine you can not lift stuff so what would be the point... Nice to have but not needed imo

Besides if it were possible I'd want a Droge drop Sheridan on a sled from a C-130 XD
Image
This too would be nice to have but that wouldn't be necessary in PR:V:BF2 how ever if PR:A2 becomes successful which it will and they think about making PR:A2:V the possibilities would be awesome.
Last edited by Hitman.2.5 on 2010-04-18 16:28, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: error
Derpist
mangeface
Posts: 2105
Joined: 2009-12-13 09:56

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by mangeface »

Snazz wrote:Practicality > Aesthetics

That said I like the look of most Vietnam era helicopters personally, a lot of which have been upgraded since and continue to serve (Chinook, Huey, Cobra, Stallion, Littlebird).
You pretty much forgot the most important one of them. The CH-46 Sea Knight, a.k.a. the Phrog.

Funny how pretty much most of them are USMC aircraft.
JohnnyTheIED
Posts: 452
Joined: 2009-01-01 20:13

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by JohnnyTheIED »

Anybody remember the Desert Combat AC-130 gunship? :)

The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.
Image
Sgt.BountyOrig
Posts: 656
Joined: 2009-02-22 18:12

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by Sgt.BountyOrig »

I think its always had a back trap that worked (it does in DC now though anyway)

It might be better balanced if the BF2 version didnt have a tonna guns on the side.
Alternatively, that just makes it a faster, and probably less safer sky crane
[NO] Bounty
Hitman.2.5
Posts: 1086
Joined: 2008-03-21 20:54

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by Hitman.2.5 »

TheOldBreed wrote:to be fair, i can't see the skycrane being used a whole lot, in combat i mean. in 'nam, armour was used for things: base defence; search & destroy operations; route security; up North they were pretty decent at stopping border incursions. i'm guessing the skycrane was used to transport tanks that thad been immobilized "deep in the bush" (teehee) or vice versa back into it.
what i mean to say is, in the situations that PRV will give, they'll most likely be nothing more than infantry support or maybe at best be used for route security. in these situations, airlifting armour here, there and everywhere would pretty much be irrelevant.

sick suggestion though man
Actually they were used a lot especially with the construction of a firebase they choppered in D7 dozers
Image
and Case Back hoe's
Image
and small containers to be buried and made into command bunkers
Image

but why would we need this?
Derpist
Smiddey723
Posts: 901
Joined: 2010-03-27 18:59

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by Smiddey723 »

JohnnyTheIED wrote:Anybody remember the Desert Combat AC-130 gunship? :)

The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.

Funny you say this, i was looking at youtube videos of DC the other day and one of the comments was "What game is this, Project Reality?"
.:2p:.Smiddey
TheOldBreed
Posts: 637
Joined: 2009-05-08 23:03

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by TheOldBreed »

Hitman.2.5 wrote:Actually they were used a lot especially with the construction of a firebase they choppered in D7 dozers

but why would we need this?
aye, but i meant in combat situations.
Hitman.2.5
Posts: 1086
Joined: 2008-03-21 20:54

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by Hitman.2.5 »

Were tanks frequently air dropped by a sky crane into the field? or were they "MECivac'ing" them out of the field?
Last edited by Hitman.2.5 on 2010-04-24 11:37, edited 1 time in total.
Derpist
xatu miller
Posts: 431
Joined: 2008-05-01 12:38

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by xatu miller »

JohnnyTheIED wrote:Anybody remember the Desert Combat AC-130 gunship? :)

The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.
Possible in 1942 not BF2 sadly.


"Intermolecular interactions in the flake's matrix could be weakened by the plasticizer [water], leading to the solubilization of some components, and to a decrease in mechanical integrity."
READ: Water makes cereal soggy.
sakils2
Posts: 1374
Joined: 2007-07-14 23:15

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by sakils2 »

pfhatoa
Posts: 917
Joined: 2009-08-27 19:26

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by pfhatoa »

Adetter wrote:Maybe because in Vietnam war was the first time helicopters was a part of the combat....
A bit off topic but that is not true. The french army used armed helicopters in the Algerian War and U.S.A used some during the korean war.

Source: Armed helicopter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Yes I know it's wiki)
JAMES_AT_Battlefield
Posts: 38
Joined: 2010-04-07 15:43

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by JAMES_AT_Battlefield »

JohnnyTheIED wrote:Anybody remember the Desert Combat AC-130 gunship? :)

The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.
yes i remember the AC-130 :-)
Sniper77shot
Posts: 509
Joined: 2009-12-24 04:46

Re: CH-54A skycrane?

Post by Sniper77shot »

Airlifting has been suggested but it will never happen.
Image
Locked

Return to “PR:V Suggestions”