Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post your feedback on the current Project Reality release (including SinglePlayer).
stealth420
Posts: 256
Joined: 2009-09-29 19:59

Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by stealth420 »

Ill start it offf with a brief history.

.87 the best version of this game that came out, Perfect loading times , smooth FPS as smoot as a babys bottom. I loaded the map and always got in at 2:45 , and the round begins at 3:00

.90 Really good updates , but the loading times, really started losing FPS and i wouldnt load into game until around 2:10.

.91 FPS improves but loading times for all maps have dropped really, Now i load maps and enter the round around 1:35.

I thought .91 would bring us back to.87 load times , but i guess its just more addons and that causes more lag.

Post any thoughts and any solutions to loading time problems.
Menigmand
Posts: 128
Joined: 2008-11-09 13:13

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Menigmand »

I wouldn't mind waiting a bit longer at the loading screen for new/better content, but I find that I simply can't play the new maps because of the stuttering.

Seems like you got a huge improvement in the load times if you now enter the map at 1:35 as opposed to 2:45 or 2:10?
Drunkenup
Posts: 786
Joined: 2009-03-16 20:53

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Drunkenup »

Performance vastly improved for me. Loading times are as fast as ever, running Fallujah at a stable 60 fps compared to 20 in 0.9. And what addons came in 0.9? There were no major changes, just fixes. Might just be your computer.
Teek
Posts: 3162
Joined: 2006-12-23 02:45

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Teek »

I still load in close to the 3:00 minute mark still, haven't noticed a diffrence

Stealth, Have you tried Defragging your hard drive?
Image
Pursketuli [FIN]
Posts: 37
Joined: 2009-06-17 10:17

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Pursketuli [FIN] »

I have same issues, PR is too hungry with memory. 2Gb runs out easily and when windows starts virtual memory using, lag and shuttering begins. 0.8 was the best PR ever. But when game freezes for few seconds, PB loses connection and kicks me off. It's frustrating to join and get kicked if you wan't to play in same map with your mates. Now, even Crysis runs smoother and better with my comp. If someone asks about defrag, I run it several times per month or weekly.
Drunkenup
Posts: 786
Joined: 2009-03-16 20:53

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Drunkenup »

'Pursketuli [FIN wrote:;1331277']I have same issues, PR is too hungry with memory. 2Gb runs out easily and when windows starts virtual memory using, lag and shuttering begins. 0.8 was the best PR ever. But when game freezes for few seconds, PB loses connection and kicks me off. It's frustrating to join and get kicked if you wan't to play in same map with your mates. Now, even Crysis runs smoother and better with my comp. If someone asks about defrag, I run it several times per month or weekly.
2Gbs of memory is sorta pushing to when it comes to PR, it'll easily use up a good amount of that 2Gb. Maps got bigger, geometries and objects got more detailed = more memory required.
myles
Posts: 1614
Joined: 2008-11-09 14:34

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by myles »

Im waiting about 4 mins just to load a map takes 4 mins anyone else getting this
Check out my Project Reaity gamplay here http://www.youtube.com/user/Projectreality1

Image
Lange
Posts: 306
Joined: 2007-02-28 23:39

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Lange »

I've noticed it too. In .9 I had loading times where i'd join in about 2:30 or so but now I get in almost consistently at about 1:50 give or take. Not sure what caused the increase in loading times.
Herbiie
Posts: 2022
Joined: 2009-08-24 11:21

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Herbiie »

myles wrote:Im waiting about 4 mins just to load a map takes 4 mins anyone else getting this
Maybe you shouldn't be watching the good stuff while you load eh?
ConscriptVirus
Posts: 489
Joined: 2006-12-18 04:02

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by ConscriptVirus »

yeah make sure u defrag. also wat OS are u using? if ur still on XP, switching to vista/7 seemed to make loading times for programs go way down (superfetch). i havent really noticed any change to the loading times from .87 -> .9 -> .91. =/
Image
"These things we do that others may live"
myles
Posts: 1614
Joined: 2008-11-09 14:34

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by myles »

its stopped for me now i jsut did some stuff with my settings its alright
Check out my Project Reaity gamplay here http://www.youtube.com/user/Projectreality1

Image
Gore
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2491
Joined: 2008-02-15 21:39

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Gore »

Lowering your graphics will improve your loading times very much. I play on medium, then I load fast enough to get in the squads I want.
Dev1200
Posts: 1708
Joined: 2008-11-30 23:01

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Dev1200 »

Don't play the new maps if your going to QQ about FPS drops. The new maps are on the EDGE of frying the BF2 engine. They're very well detailed and have lots of undergrowth, overgrowth, vehicles, statics, effect, etc.


If it's laggy for you, turn down your settings. Otherwise, update your system. It's not .9. It's the new maps. .9 is epic, and kit geoms isn't what is pinning your system down. It's all the grass, statics, etc.
Image
Pursketuli [FIN]
Posts: 37
Joined: 2009-06-17 10:17

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Pursketuli [FIN] »

Drunkenup wrote:2Gbs of memory is sorta pushing to when it comes to PR, it'll easily use up a good amount of that 2Gb. Maps got bigger, geometries and objects got more detailed = more memory required.
Even older maps, which worked propely, are now a way heavier. I can remember when the Kashan Desert was new, map loaded fast. But now all the maps are unbeliveable heavy included the Kashan. I have defragged the hard disc but no any effect to better. I have no idea what the PR team have done, but making maps very laggy is good way to loose gamers with older machines. Right now insurgent maps are too big for 64 players. You should make smaller city maps like Strike in Karkand or Muttrah city. Also there should be one Insurgent headquaters what the Insurgents should defend.
AK47shooter
Posts: 28
Joined: 2009-01-05 13:59

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by AK47shooter »

This is a massive problem for me, and has sort of ruined PR for me.

Running Windows 7, 4GB Ram etc etc...

Able to run PR all on high before 9.1...

Still can run on high, but the loading times are biblical, to go from entering at round at the 2.50 mark, to having to wait over 5 minutes for a map to load is crazy, anyone know why it is doing this?
“Communists usually use AK47s.”

~ Captain Obvious on AK47s
Psyrus
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3841
Joined: 2006-06-19 17:10

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Psyrus »

AK47shooter wrote:This is a massive problem for me, and has sort of ruined PR for me.

Running Windows 7, 4GB Ram etc etc...

Able to run PR all on high before 9.1...

Still can run on high, but the loading times are biblical, to go from entering at round at the 2.50 mark, to having to wait over 5 minutes for a map to load is crazy, anyone know why it is doing this?
Have you tried battlefield2cleaner recently? Clear your graphics cache, it should help.

Umm... loading times are hard-drive & ram dependent afaik. If you have 4GB that should be fine, so the HDD is the only thing I can think of. Defrag maybe :grin:
AK47shooter
Posts: 28
Joined: 2009-01-05 13:59

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by AK47shooter »

Psyrus wrote: Have you tried battlefield2cleaner recently? Clear your graphics cache, it should help.
Umm... loading times are hard-drive & ram dependent afaik. If you have 4GB that should be fine, so the HDD is the only thing I can think of. Defrag maybe :grin:
Have tried that, even when I put all my settings on low it is really slow, Hard drive has been defragged.... Fresh install... :x
“Communists usually use AK47s.”

~ Captain Obvious on AK47s
Psyrus
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3841
Joined: 2006-06-19 17:10

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by Psyrus »

AK47shooter wrote:Have tried that, even when I put all my settings on low it is really slow, Hard drive has been defragged.... Fresh install... :x
Hmm I'm not sure then... because I load just as fast as in 0.87.

Oh if you buy more RAM [like 8GB+] then chuck the whole BF2 folder in a ramdrive and you'll load faster than you can believe ;)
SaleemAfsoonMahmoud
Posts: 13
Joined: 2010-04-09 18:03

Re: Even Slower Loading times with .91

Post by SaleemAfsoonMahmoud »

Maybe upgrade the PC then? I mean you wouldn't expect to be able to play new games like BC2 with an old computer would you?
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Feedback”