Would you like to see more detroyed buildings and such?

[Winstonkalkaros]

Lag is one of the biggest problems I think. But yes, a lot more damage. All the cars wouldn't have to be already blown up, more small destroyable structures. Then artillery and airstrikes would seem to have some effect on the ground and not just destroy two jeeps.

[Serbiak]

serbiak, winstonklakros, and others:

This is not about destroyable buildings!
This is about pre-destroyed static buildings.
Hopefully that should get this thread back on topic and prevent any further confusion...

Oooops sorry for causing confusion.

In that case yes more destroyed stuff since it´s a war zone.

[Cassius]

I voted yes, assuming it was about destroyable buildings. Maybe more battle damage on AAS maps, seen as the coaltition typically does not carpetbomb Afghanistan or Iraq.

[iwillkillyouhun]

i voted yes but if you do then please do like the destroyed hummves. Like the ones on Karbala and Qwuai River and sunset where you can actually CLIMB in the humwee form the gunner position. This might sound weird those whom never tried it before but it's actually a really good cover and a hiding position and i am talking about the STATIC hummve not those you can drive just think about it and plz make them let us to climb in or use it as a cover

\thanks

[Pursketuli [FIN]]

No anymore complicated buildings. PR is now too heavy for older PC:s. More objects per map would make impossible to play with older computers. I wonder how PR wastes memory so much? Even 2Gb of ram isn't enough for this memory hungy modification.

[driver-ch-driver]

I thought it was more destroyable buildings too..

But yeah I wouldn't mind seeing more battle damage on maps

[BloodBane611]

The reason there are no dedicated static modelers is because it's fecking boring and time consuming. If you want destroyed buildings, get your hands on a copy of Max9 and start modeling and texturing. In addition, there are a lot of non-destroyed buildings that should be created before we start thinking about destroyed variants, and I imagine future PR modelers will focus on those first. So yeh, if you want some, make them.

[Stoic Sentinel]

This is not about destroyable buildings!
This is about pre-destroyed static buildings.

Absolutely yes! Destroyable buildings are one of my favorites things about PR!







Jokes, mate.

[Phantom2]

Would be laggy as heck though. But, I'd like to see a little more.

[JustinPL]

Some destroyed stuff would really bring atmosphere to the situation. It would be nice if there was more

[Endymion]

Blow it all up!

I want to be able to make a parking spot for my tank where ever i please!

[Hulabi]

What i want to see the most, are destructible walls, you could stick an C4 on the wall and blow your way in.

[Michael_Denmark]

I would love to play a map like Street again

Was it fully destructible

Imagine after three hours of heavy fighting, with spawns in the sewers in each end of the map. Buildings coming down, rubble all over, smoke all over, the entire landscape changes and one conqueror standing back, in a see of fallen structures, rubble and smoking flames.

Beautiful.

[usmcguy]

it would be cool to be able to put some holes ina building with my m203..yes more wreckage!

[gazzthompson]

so much fail in this thread its unreal. guys read the original post.

[goguapsy]

I was in doubt between the third and fourth options... Got to get the third.

Though the fourth is more accurate about me.

[Thermis]

Old Thread is old.