Would you like to have a 1 mumble channel event with no voip?

[OldGoat5]

No trolling, those are the arguments i've heard on servers. just proving a point sort of. of course two channels are better for actual gameplay

[Cassius]

Personally I do not like mumble to have one channel.

Soldiers can keep talking down using handsigns we can not.
Everybody speaks the same language when the fight becomes close quarters, its difficult to tell apart who is shouting out orders or warnings.

I would still like to join that one mumble channel event. Id like to see more players in general make use of the mumble program and servers provided for each and every server.

[=Romagnolo=]

Soldiers can keep talking down using handsigns we can not.

We can, we can type ! For exemple, if the soldier want to pass a mensage, he release his weapon and shake his hands to "say" something. In game, we release the mouse and use the hand to type the mensage.

[Tartantyco]

We can, we can type ! For exemple, if the soldier want to pass a mensage, he release his weapon and shake his hands to "say" something. In game, we release the mouse and use the hand to type the mensage.

Not even remotely the same thing. Just read this thread to find out why 2 channels is superior and 1 channel is a waste of time.

[RememberTheAlamo]

Not even remotely the same thing. Just read this thread to find out why 2 channels is superior and 1 channel is a waste of time.

1 Channel - 177
2 Channel - 227

So not that big of a difference really


Remember this thread is not about which mumble is better, it's about whenever you would like to see such event or no. You can discuss what mumble is better on the link provided by Tartantyco.

Thanks for everyone's input! You will see our event in the events section shortly!

[Pedz]

Going back to the main question, I think a sufficient enough of the people who play PR would love a 1 channel mumble event. This topic has gone into a ***** fight for 1 channel vs 2 channel I swear lol. I say they both have their upsides and downsides, but who's stopping two events happening, and this is for a 1 mumble channel event, not two, make your own 2 channel event I guess?

[Startrekern]

We are going to run this event on Thursday. Check the Event News forums. (WW3)

[Tartantyco]

1 Channel - 177
2 Channel - 227

So not that big of a difference really

It's not a popularity contest, it's about actually using or not using mumble. 1 channel fails miserably.

[maarit]

so,are you gonna try this again?
i readed from community events that you got some problems when event were on.
what kind of problems?is this kind of event impossible to make?

[badmojo420]

No way, too much room for exploitation.

[karambaitos]

well not having voip is just bad, i remember when the voip server was down on UKWF it was horrible you could not communicate correctly with your squad mates, you couldnt warn anyone or be a spotter for your squad, also IRL soldiers have radios so voip is like a radio

[Cassius]

As an event? Sure sounds fun. But in general I prefer 2 voip channels on mumble.

[liningwzgl]

Wait,what's the game again?Oh,yeah,"realitymod"!
1 channel mumble will be great.But if the developer don't get rid of the in-game viop and replace it with mumble,people will still use the sucking voip and team speak.Just make pr a legend please!

[NoobSentinel]

An only Mumble event would be good, if all participiants would use it, and no other programme would be used. (no Teamspeak no xfire)
Maybe not even ingame chat...???