|TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Player feedback for all Project Reality: Battlefield 2 servers.
Post Reply
d1sp0sabl3H3r0
Posts: 439
Joined: 2007-07-03 20:57

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by d1sp0sabl3H3r0 »

Shrivey wrote:Im banned from this server although i've never been on it?????!!!
We have 2 "reserved" slots that allow Supporting Members (aka paying subscribers) to join the server, leaving us with 62 open slots. If you connect at 62 or 63 players, you will be "kicked" for teamkilling but in reality the fact is is that the script managing the SM slots didn't recognize you as a Supporting Member and removed you from the server. Please note that you may also be automatically removed from the server during a round if a Supporting Member joins the server. This is the longest playing person on the server that is not a Supporting Member and is selected solely (by the script logic) on this criteria and this criteria only.

Please try to join when the server shows 60 or fewer players, although since .95 has been released we've been running full pretty much 24/7. The best advice I can give is to be patient and keep trying.
Mongolian_dude
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 6088
Joined: 2006-10-22 22:24

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by Mongolian_dude »

This server is pretty hidhspeedlowdrag.


...mongol...
Military lawyers engaged in fierce legal action.

[INDENT][INDENT]Image[/INDENT][/INDENT]
communistman
Posts: 123
Joined: 2010-01-20 07:31

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by communistman »

With the release of .95, and me not being a supporting member and all, it seems I need to start going through the grieving process, and must become accustomed to the fact that I will never play on TG again...

:D
d1sp0sabl3H3r0
Posts: 439
Joined: 2007-07-03 20:57

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by d1sp0sabl3H3r0 »

Server now running .957b

- increased tickets
- fixed CTD due to German AT
- etc.
Incognito84
Posts: 473
Joined: 2009-03-10 02:55

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by Incognito84 »

Hey, I seem to be banned from your server! I know there are reserved slots but I still get a "kicked" message even if I try to connect while there are only 40 players in.

My ingame name is the same as my nick on here. I haven't played on that server in months (maybe more than that) and didn't misbehave when I was there. Do you mind taking a look into it? Cheers.
d1sp0sabl3H3r0
Posts: 439
Joined: 2007-07-03 20:57

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by d1sp0sabl3H3r0 »

Please contact us on our forums regarding any bans. There is a link to the "Contact an Admin" forum in my signature block. We will address bans there, not in these forums. Thanks.
Imchicken1
Posts: 512
Joined: 2008-11-08 05:09

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by Imchicken1 »

Im just wondering and dont think this really requires its own thread so....

Is it possible to have the |TG| tags without being a SM? Because i see people with TG tags being kicked all the time :confused:
Image

I won't cluck for you
d1sp0sabl3H3r0
Posts: 439
Joined: 2007-07-03 20:57

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by d1sp0sabl3H3r0 »

Imchicken1 wrote:Im just wondering and dont think this really requires its own thread so....

Is it possible to have the |TG| tags without being a SM? Because i see people with TG tags being kicked all the time :confused:
Tactical Gamer is a community, not a clan, and as such, we have minimal requirements to wear our tags. Essentially, by wearing them you signify that you agree with our philosophy on gaming and agree to uphold our Primer.

Some threads on our forums that go into more detail:
There are plenty more threads if you do a search on the forum, but I think you get the idea behind it from looking through these. I hope this answers your question, Chicken, and if you need anything else drop me a line on the TG forums.
Imchicken1
Posts: 512
Joined: 2008-11-08 05:09

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by Imchicken1 »

Thanks Dispo :-D
Image

I won't cluck for you
SpungE
Posts: 41
Joined: 2005-09-18 15:01

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by SpungE »

TG needs to make a Euro server :)
mat552
Posts: 1073
Joined: 2007-05-18 23:05

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by mat552 »

[R-MOD]Mongolian_dude wrote:This server is pretty hidhspeedlowdrag.
Does it help you OPERATE OPERATIONS OPERATIONALLY IN AN OPERATIONAL CAPACITY?
Players might be hardcoded, but that sure doesn't seem to stop anybody from trying.


The only winning move is not to play. Insurgency, that is.
sharpie
Posts: 1434
Joined: 2009-11-08 03:41

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by sharpie »

mat552 wrote:Does it help you OPERATE OPERATIONS OPERATIONALLY IN AN OPERATIONAL CAPACITY?
why yes, yes it does.
"Tom I think you have influenced the combat effectiveness of this team! Everyone has gone full potato."~Foxxyfrost

[DM]P*Funk: its like a funk guitar seminar up in that *****

K_Rivers-"...everything is broken in your country,"

RinWarZip: Your butthurt is like cold september morning by the seashore for me. Refreshing. Pepper mint.

Shrivey
Posts: 17
Joined: 2010-08-27 05:25

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by Shrivey »

d1sp0sabl3H3r0 wrote:We have 2 "reserved" slots that allow Supporting Members (aka paying subscribers) to join the server, leaving us with 62 open slots. If you connect at 62 or 63 players, you will be "kicked" for teamkilling but in reality the fact is is that the script managing the SM slots didn't recognize you as a Supporting Member and removed you from the server. Please note that you may also be automatically removed from the server during a round if a Supporting Member joins the server. This is the longest playing person on the server that is not a Supporting Member and is selected solely (by the script logic) on this criteria and this criteria only.

Please try to join when the server shows 60 or fewer players, although since .95 has been released we've been running full pretty much 24/7. The best advice I can give is to be patient and keep trying.
Thankyou for taking the time to reply to my question. Much appreciated. :-)
Smegburt_funkledink
Posts: 4080
Joined: 2007-11-29 00:29

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by Smegburt_funkledink »

SpungE wrote:TG needs to make a PR:V server :)
Fixed. ;)
[R-Div]Robbi "There's nothing more skanky than eating out of a tub of hummus with a screwdriver."
[R-DEV]Matrox "CHINAAAAAAA!!!"
SpungE
Posts: 41
Joined: 2005-09-18 15:01

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by SpungE »

european pr:v server

boom

there it is
communistman
Posts: 123
Joined: 2010-01-20 07:31

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by communistman »

Soooo, how long does it normally take for the crowd to die down after a new release? I noticed that the server isn't 64/64 anymore (usually), but obviously there are still a lot of supporting members playing because the few times I'm able to get on, I get removed in rather quick fashion to make room for SM.
Brummy
Posts: 7479
Joined: 2007-06-03 18:54

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by Brummy »

Hai, a few dais ago i wus playin wit disusablehero, i think he is a very bad admin!111
communistman wrote:Soooo, how long does it normally take for the crowd to die down after a new release? I noticed that the server isn't 64/64 anymore (usually), but obviously there are still a lot of supporting members playing because the few times I'm able to get on, I get removed in rather quick fashion to make room for SM.
64/64 is because of an error in the script that occurs sometimes. The server is still going strong, and normally people release-hype gets lower around a month after release.
Bazul14
Posts: 671
Joined: 2009-06-01 22:23

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by Bazul14 »

For some reason a dumbass from TG, wraith or something, decided to troll on another server, soloing the BTR in main and thus rendering the BTR squad locked in main since he was not willing to GTFO of the apc.
snooggums
Posts: 1093
Joined: 2008-01-26 06:33

Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (North America)

Post by snooggums »

Bazul14 wrote:For some reason a dumbass from TG, wraith or something, decided to troll on another server, soloing the BTR in main and thus rendering the BTR squad locked in main since he was not willing to GTFO of the apc.
I believe those were false tags on a griefer. I'm not aware of any players who go by Wraith at TG and no one with Wraith as part of their name has posted on the TG forums since February.

Would need the actual name to know any more.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Server Feedback”