AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
-
=HCM= Shwedor
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 2009-09-04 22:17
AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
Currently in PR AA rockets will kill caches. Is this realistic or not? The Stinger (the only usable AA by BLUFOR in insurgency) has a 2?3 kg warhead and goes about 700 m/s.
Is it not possible for a FIM-92A Stinger warhead to destroy a cache full of explosive materials?
Is it not possible for a FIM-92A Stinger warhead to destroy a cache full of explosive materials?
shwedor
-
HeXeY
- Posts: 1160
- Joined: 2008-06-28 18:03
Re: AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
It probably is plausible. The hard part would be to make the missile actually hit if you're firing it from the launcher

-
=HCM= Shwedor
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 2009-09-04 22:17
Re: AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
Would the missle require a heatsource to actually fire?
shwedor
-
Acecombatzer0
- Posts: 554
- Joined: 2010-09-26 14:10
Re: AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
The AA missile does NOT require a heat source to fire. Instead, it fires a unguided rocket that is completely harmless to vehicles or people.=HCM= Shwedor wrote:Would the missle require a heatsource to actually fire?
As a matter of fact, why does Blufor have acess to the AA kit in insurgency?
-
=HCM= Shwedor
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 2009-09-04 22:17
Re: AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
Harmless as in very inaccurate? Isn't the missle armed before being put into the launcher or does a heatsouce only activate it?
shwedor
-
Rudd
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 21225
- Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32
Re: AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
fixed for next version
[R-DEV]Jaymz wrote:Fixored,
MATERIALS: Prevented Anti-Air Missile from damaging caches
-
=HCM= Shwedor
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 2009-09-04 22:17
Re: AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
Is it possible to not prevent it from damaging caches but instead make it so that it does damage to the cache similar to a HAT kit (e.g. make the blast less like C4 and more like a Rocket)?
If it is possible for an AA rocket to damage a cache then shouldn't it remain that way ingame?
Or simply to do a patch (like with the German AT weapons on Silent Eagle) and remove it from insurgency?
If it is possible for an AA rocket to damage a cache then shouldn't it remain that way ingame?
Or simply to do a patch (like with the German AT weapons on Silent Eagle) and remove it from insurgency?
shwedor
-
Sprats
- Posts: 867
- Joined: 2009-06-10 20:06
Re: AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
havent tried lately but back in 0.85 you used to be able to kill people who were behind objects or inside vehicles with AA rocket as it used to have 50meter or so splash damage radius.Acecombatzer0 wrote:completely harmless to vehicles or people.
[19:52] Max [dreamsequencer]: exactly
[19:52] Max [dreamsequencer]: but who cares. seriously.
[19:53] Max [dreamsequencer]: i'd rather fuck my dog than marry a slut
[19:53] Qemist: .......................
Epic words by epic people..
[19:52] Max [dreamsequencer]: but who cares. seriously.
[19:53] Max [dreamsequencer]: i'd rather fuck my dog than marry a slut
[19:53] Qemist: .......................
Epic words by epic people..
-
=LK= A.H.
- Posts: 167
- Joined: 2010-04-20 20:02
Re: AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
I have taken damage from AA missile shrapnel twice in 0.957, but it's not in the least effective.Sprats wrote:havent tried lately but back in 0.85 you used to be able to kill people who were behind objects or inside vehicles with AA rocket as it used to have 50meter or so splash damage radius.
-
mat552
- Posts: 1073
- Joined: 2007-05-18 23:05
Re: AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
Because if you have an AA kit, then the enemy can't get the superior M4/G36/M16/L85. Same reason people take snipers for CQC now.Acecombatzer0 wrote:As a matter of fact, why does Blufor have acess to the AA kit in insurgency?
Players might be hardcoded, but that sure doesn't seem to stop anybody from trying.
The only winning move is not to play. Insurgency, that is.
The only winning move is not to play. Insurgency, that is.
-
Ome99
- Posts: 496
- Joined: 2008-11-29 15:14
Re: AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
Not realistic, because MANPADS have a minimum altitude at which they can engage targets, like 15m above ground level for example, hence, since the caches are at ground, the missiles wont explode.
-
Total_Overkill
- Posts: 144
- Joined: 2007-07-24 19:26
Re: AA rockets killing caches. Realistic or not?
Ome99 wrote:Not realistic, because MANPADS have a minimum altitude at which they can engage targets, like 15m above ground level for example, hence, since the caches are at ground, the missiles wont explode.
... wut?

