[0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

If you find a bug within PR:BF2 (including PRSP), please report it here.
Post Reply
Stealthgato
Posts: 2676
Joined: 2010-10-22 02:42

[0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by Stealthgato »

Wanted to post this for a while but kept forgetting.

Description:
The Hamas M16A2 is using single and full auto firemodes, when the M16A2 is only single and burst.

Steps to Reproduce:
Obtain Hamas kit with M16A2 (primary rifleman AT and AP).

Tested On:
Asad Khal AAS/Skirmish, local, PRTA, NEW, v0.966, v0.973;
Gaza Beach AAS/INS, local, PRTA, NEW, v0.966, v0.973.
pr0Life
Posts: 45
Joined: 2011-09-06 05:01

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by pr0Life »

Aren't M16's in the Israel region actually M16A1's?
SShadowFox
Posts: 1123
Joined: 2012-01-25 21:35

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by SShadowFox »

Yes it's the M16A2 being used by the Hamas L-AT and Rifleman AP, due to the PR archives.
Image
[R-DEV]Spec:The suggestion is not accepted, I merely wanted to comment.

Shame doesn't work on me, Nor on men of my caliber.
PGT_Hubbard
Posts: 57
Joined: 2012-09-17 02:13

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by PGT_Hubbard »

Because the particular M16A2 the Hamas use has an A1 lower and A2 upper I believe. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Souls Of Mischief
Posts: 2391
Joined: 2008-05-04 00:44

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by Souls Of Mischief »

^I always thought it was the case with the M16A2.
SShadowFox
Posts: 1123
Joined: 2012-01-25 21:35

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by SShadowFox »

The case is that it's not really a bug so it should be posted on the Feedback Section.
Image
[R-DEV]Spec:The suggestion is not accepted, I merely wanted to comment.

Shame doesn't work on me, Nor on men of my caliber.
RUSSIAN147
Posts: 109
Joined: 2009-10-17 09:10

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by RUSSIAN147 »

Then it is actually an A3:
"The M16A3 was a fully automatic variant of the M16A2 adopted in small numbers around the time of the introduction of the M16A2, primarily by the U.S. Navy for use by SEAL, Seabee, and Security units. It features the M16A1 trigger group providing "safe", "semi-automatic", and "fully automatic" modes."

M16 rifle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"I'd like to see you run faster than my 124gr JHP"
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by Rudd »

I'm only guessing, but I think there's a reason the Hamas AR15 variants have got unique names, just like the Israeli variants having their own names.
Image
k30dxedle
Posts: 163
Joined: 2007-01-20 18:31

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by k30dxedle »

I'm pretty sure the Hamas "M16A2" is just an M16A1 fitted with A2 handguards, which would make full-auto legitimate.
Image
ComradeHX
Posts: 3294
Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by ComradeHX »

Most likely; it is just A1 refitted with newer handguards.

If it says A2; just ignore it. Does not matter too much even if it is not changed in v1.0. since you can also turn M16A1 into Mk18 just by putting on newer upper assembly and stock, iirc.

Real problem is solid stock AK-74 texture(it has folding stock's latches on it).
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by samogon100500 »

Im a bit curios,why this incorrection found now.I found it since they was added.
ComradeHX wrote:Real problem is solid stock AK-74 texture(it has folding stock's latches on it).
AK-74 got solid buttstock.
AKS-74(Not ingame),AKS-74U and AK-74M got folding buttstock.
But they modelled as solid one.This is impossible to fix without 3d model changes.
Image
ComradeHX
Posts: 3294
Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by ComradeHX »

samogon100500 wrote: AK-74 got solid buttstock.
AKS-74(Not ingame),AKS-74U and AK-74M got folding buttstock.
But they modelled as solid one.This is impossible to fix without 3d model changes.
I know exactly what they are supposed to be.
I was referring to INS AK-74.

I posted this: https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f26-pr ... error.html

In-game, only real fix is just change of texture(model is not very detailed); also need to add rivets texture for rear trunnion.
RUSSIAN147
Posts: 109
Joined: 2009-10-17 09:10

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by RUSSIAN147 »

k30dxedle wrote:I'm pretty sure the Hamas "M16A2" is just an M16A1 fitted with A2 handguards, which would make full-auto legitimate.
Yeah thats true as well.
"I'd like to see you run faster than my 124gr JHP"
J.F.Leusch69
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2988
Joined: 2008-04-23 16:37

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by J.F.Leusch69 »

Its a M16A1 with A2 handguard.

Its now up to you to come up with a better designation!
Smiddey723
Posts: 901
Joined: 2010-03-27 18:59

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by Smiddey723 »

ComradeHX wrote:Real problem is solid stock AK-74 texture(it has folding stock's latches on it).
Real problem that :roll:
.:2p:.Smiddey
ComradeHX
Posts: 3294
Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by ComradeHX »

Smiddey723 wrote:Real problem that :roll:
Yep, real problem.

Because texture is s**t like that which is much bigger problem(quality of PR related) instead of just some insignificant M16 name.

M16A2, btw, is very possibly correct; because, towards middle/end of Cold War, US army ran out of rightside handguard for M16A1, so armorers were allowed to replace with M16A2 handguards, they got A2 look just by swapping handguard and flashhider. You either call it M16A1 due to receiver or A2 due to looks. Generally it is called M16A2 due to looks because if you just care about receiver then some CQB-R are made from A1 receivers so they would be called M16A1 instead.

Since U.S. Army ran out of A1 handguard; why would Isreali have those when they could have A2 handguards?
Last edited by ComradeHX on 2012-10-11 22:19, edited 4 times in total.
RUSSIAN147
Posts: 109
Joined: 2009-10-17 09:10

Re: [0.973] M16A2 incorrect firemode

Post by RUSSIAN147 »

ComradeHX wrote:Yep, real problem.

Because texture is s**t like that which is much bigger problem(quality of PR related) instead of just some insignificant M16 name.

M16A2, btw, is very possibly correct; because, towards middle/end of Cold War, US army ran out of rightside handguard for M16A1, so armorers were allowed to replace with M16A2 handguards, they got A2 look just by swapping handguard and flashhider. You either call it M16A1 due to receiver or A2 due to looks. Generally it is called M16A2 due to looks because if you just care about receiver then some CQB-R are made from A1 receivers so they would be called M16A1 instead.

Since U.S. Army ran out of A1 handguard; why would Isreali have those when they could have A2 handguards?
Again another good point. Like you said just take a look at the IDF's "Menosar", "Mekotzar" and "Mekotzrar" M16A1's.
"I'd like to see you run faster than my 124gr JHP"
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Bugs”