Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

maniac1031 · Post by **maniac1031** » 2012-12-31 18:53

I will sell my soul to any dev willing to show me the new m14ebr and mk12 model or sound of the silenced mk12 being fired

Post by **Adriaan** » 2012-12-31 19:14

maniac1031 wrote:I will sell my soul to any dev willing to show me the new m14ebr and mk12 model or sound of the silenced mk12 being fired

Your soul is miiine

psychickactivity · Post by **psychickactivity** » 2012-12-31 19:16

Is it possible to have ? message of happy new year from ? DEV on video?

gipakok · Post by **gipakok** » 2012-12-31 20:48

Dear devs, will there be a change in the future in the way that the sniper kit works now in PR (which is pretty much just CoD with deviation changes) to a more realistic system?

MADsqirrel · Post by **MADsqirrel** » 2012-12-31 21:23

gipakok wrote:Dear devs, will there be a change in the future in the way that the sniper kit works now in PR (which is pretty much just CoD with deviation changes) to a more realistic system?

What do you mean exactly? bullet drop? IRL you aim at youre target, determine the distance and the wind, adjust youre scope and shoot.
Because there is no RL ballistic of normal bullets ingame (like for examle with the Panzerfaust 3 or the granadelunchers) i doubt there will be the possibility to adjust youre scope.

Rabbit · Post by **Rabbit** » 2012-12-31 21:34

MADsqirrel wrote:What do you mean exactly? bullet drop? IRL you aim at youre target, determine the distance and the wind, adjust youre scope and shoot.
Because there is no RL ballistic of normal bullets ingame (like for examle with the Panzerfaust 3 or the granadelunchers) i doubt there will be the possibility to adjust youre scope.

I don't know, maybe you could do something like the GL and choose to move it in mills or something.

Pvt.LHeureux · Post by **Pvt.LHeureux** » 2012-12-31 23:18

Well there is that wind affected projectile project going on :

PGT_Hubbard · Post by **PGT_Hubbard** » 2012-12-31 23:38

Also, I don't believe I got an answer to my question about the M240 being left off the Abrams roof.

Post by **Rudd** » 2012-12-31 23:53

PGT_Hubbard wrote:Also, I don't believe I got an answer to my question about the M240 being left off the Abrams roof.

it would be a misappropriation of ingame manpower

Also as far as I know the m240 is to be used by the crew's loader- but ofc the loader cant load and shoot at the same time - trying to simulate that ingame would be quite complicated; additionally there might be issues with a realsitic weapon mount
I

Pvt.LHeureux · Post by **Pvt.LHeureux** » 2013-01-01 01:34

That would make one less guy on the field and one more useless dude on a tank.

SShadowFox · Post by **SShadowFox** » 2013-01-01 03:47

Can I still expect the 1.0 release being today?

By the way, happy new year!

Post by **rPoXoTauJIo** » 2013-01-02 18:50

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:...weapon to take out Firebases but for v1.0 we are looking at not making knifes destroy them anyways...

But what will be instead in inf kits to destroy fobs?

Rabbit · Post by **Rabbit** » 2013-01-02 19:38

I saw the dutch forces have (at least a version of) the M320. Will we see that replacing the M203 for the US forces?

Kothra · Post by **Kothra** » 2013-01-02 19:42

rPoXoTauJIo wrote:But what will be instead in inf kits to destroy fobs?

C4 from a Combat Engineer.

gipakok · Post by **gipakok** » 2013-01-02 19:55

Dear devs, does the BF2 engine support more than 9 squads per team? And if it doesn't, won't the teamwork get screwed since there can only be 8 people in a vehicle?

Pvt.LHeureux · Post by **Pvt.LHeureux** » 2013-01-02 19:57

No, just give more vehicles!

izoiva · Post by **izoiva** » 2013-01-02 23:06

[R-DEV]Rudd wrote:it would be a misappropriation of ingame manpower

Also as far as I know the m240 is to be used by the crew's loader- but ofc the loader cant load and shoot at the same time - trying to simulate that ingame would be quite complicated; additionally there might be issues with a realsitic weapon mount
I

What about remote-controlled .50 for tanks?

Post by **Rudd** » 2013-01-02 23:24

izoiva wrote:What about remote-controlled .50 for tanks?

again, a misappropriation of manpower tbh. Best to stick with the 50cal, keeps an incentive for the driver to stay in his position instead of switching around anyway, unless we had a vbf2 turret driver system, which will not happen because that is a serious step backwards.

Pronck · Post by **Pronck** » 2013-01-03 00:32

Since when is Rudd back on the team?

Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)