Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

SShadowFox · Post by **SShadowFox** » 2013-05-30 18:11

Microwaife wrote:Is the faction on the vehicle also playing a role?

If so we might get the Dutch in 1.0

Would be a win.

Quobble · Post by **Quobble** » 2013-05-30 18:33

My question:
Will there be any changes effecting the area attacks in 1.0?
Are the insurgent factions like taliban, hamas etc. getting some sort of area attack as well?
Like Qasam rocket attacks or a SCUD launch?

Greetings

Post by **Moszeusz6Pl** » 2013-05-30 18:38

100p servers was confirmed long time ago. About area attacks, there will be some changes.

hobbnob · Post by **hobbnob** » 2013-05-30 18:41

[R-CON]Moszeusz6Pl wrote:100p servers was confirmed long time ago. About area attacks, there will be some changes.

I've seen no such confirmation? I've seen various maps get the 100p treatment, but it's never been actually confirmed that the servers are getting the same as far as I've seen.

I'd love it if you proved me wrong however.

izoiva · Post by **izoiva** » 2013-05-30 18:58

Why is the game so much armor, prodused in small numbers?
For example, only 6 pumas were prodused.

Post by **Spush** » 2013-05-30 19:09

Yeah but they ordered quite a few so that's the reason.

Quobble · Post by **Quobble** » 2013-05-30 19:43

may i ask what the changes in area attacks will be

?

Post by **Rudd** » 2013-05-30 19:45

izoiva wrote:Why is the game so much armor, prodused in small numbers?
For example, only 6 pumas were prodused.

Using teh puma so much ingame wasn't really ideal but there wasn't an option to use something lighter. which is why we are so excited by Surround's work on the Fuchs

ShockUnitBlack · Post by **ShockUnitBlack** » 2013-05-30 20:09

SShadowFox wrote:If so we might get the Dutch in 1.0

Would be a win.

Probably for the Germans if it is added. Also...

Oh, and two dev signatures currently feature the German Dingo ATF.

Stealthgato · Post by **Stealthgato** » 2013-05-30 20:25

Quobble wrote:Is it normal that the melitia T-62 has a thermal observe device on the left side of the barrel?

It's not thermal equipment, it's an infrared searchlight, and yes it's normal. The older T-55 also had it.

Post by **Jafar Ironclad** » 2013-05-30 20:36

The dev signature conspiracy applies to some, but not all.

Remember when I had a Hind in my signature?

Post by **Rhino** » 2013-05-30 20:39

And now your back to your old F-16 and Su-27 with the new template

Pvt.LHeureux · Post by **Pvt.LHeureux** » 2013-05-30 21:35

Rhino changed his avatar, now I have to get used to that all over again

Rabbit · Post by **Rabbit** » 2013-05-30 21:41

Any hints on map names that should be in 1.0?

Microwaife · Post by **Microwaife** » 2013-05-30 21:48

You devs should make a hangman game for map names!

Post by **Spec** » 2013-05-30 22:27

Pvt.LHeureux wrote:Rhino changed his avatar, now I have to get used to that all over again

Well, it's a rhino. Should be simple enough to remember

Darman1138 · Post by **Darman1138** » 2013-05-31 11:05

After watching the newest video from Anders I have a question not really worth putting in the Suggestion forum. When you're sprinting in 1.0, shouldn't there be some more camera sway? Everything looks phenomenal, I just thought it was a little odd that you still "glide" when you sprint.

Post by **Adriaan** » 2013-05-31 11:39

Pretty sure there is, in 0.98 already as well (although I can't confirm it myself right now, maybe someone else can). Often when you sprint in BF2, usually on slanted surfaces, the animation for it won't start playing for some time or until you reach a flat surface.

Vista · Post by **Vista** » 2013-05-31 11:41

Operation Tempest? Is that still in development?

Post by **Adriaan** » 2013-05-31 11:45

It is/was a project of ChiefRyza, who I think used to be an R-CON a year ago or so? He's been mostly inactive due to real life problems iirc. Since he's not a teammember we don't know anything about the status of his projects, including Op. Tempest. It's a shame though, he made some great looking environments.

Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)