Rate of fire on APCs
-
tANNERRRR
- Posts: 67
- Joined: 2011-02-25 01:32
Rate of fire on APCs
Why on Earth is the Scimitars rate of fire beyond slow now? It is terrible. The vehicle is completely useless now. I have no idea how the thing reacts in real life, but even if it shoots that slow, the rate of fire needs to be raised in game. It fires one round about every second. Please change this back.
-
Eddie Baker
- Posts: 6945
- Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00
Re: Rate of fire on APCs
Because it really is that slow. So is the Warrior. It is fed with manually loaded 3 round strips and only holds 2 of those strips in the magazine.tANNERRRR wrote:Why on Earth is the Scimitars rate of fire beyond slow now? It is terrible. The vehicle is completely useless now. I have no idea how the thing reacts in real life, but even if it shoots that slow, the rate of fire needs to be raised in game. It fires one round about every second. Please change this back.
Also, I'd suggest changing your thread title to Scimitar, since that's what you're complaining about, and it isn't an APC.
-
Careless
- Posts: 390
- Joined: 2013-07-02 19:01
Re: Rate of fire on APCs
FV107 Scimitar
Main armament: 30 mm L21 RARDEN cannon. (Fires at up to 90 rounds per minute)
1,5 rounds per second.
Main armament: 30 mm L21 RARDEN cannon. (Fires at up to 90 rounds per minute)
1,5 rounds per second.
Building a new computer? Check this out:
http://www.logicalincrements.com/
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/
http://www.logicalincrements.com/
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/
-
tANNERRRR
- Posts: 67
- Joined: 2011-02-25 01:32
Re: Rate of fire on APCs
It may be like that in real life but IMO for the sake of balance in game, the rate of fire should be slighty higher.
-
Eddie Baker
- Posts: 6945
- Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00
Re: Rate of fire on APCs
No, for the sake of balance in game, the UK Forces should get Javelin to make up for their lack of firepower in other assets.tANNERRRR wrote:It may be like that in real life but IMO for the sake of balance in game, the rate of fire should be slighty higher.
-
matty1053
- Posts: 2007
- Joined: 2013-07-03 00:17
Re: Rate of fire on APCs
Definently more realistic.
I am happy with it. But it blows when going face to face w/ enemy tanks.
I am happy with it. But it blows when going face to face w/ enemy tanks.
-
Conman51
- Posts: 2628
- Joined: 2008-05-03 00:27
Re: Rate of fire on APCs
Since when are APCs supposed to take on tanks with 30mm cannons?matty1053 wrote:Definently more realistic.
I am happy with it. But it blows when going face to face w/ enemy tanks.
-
risegold8929
- Posts: 340
- Joined: 2012-02-05 22:13
Re: Rate of fire on APCs
Lol, this post. +1Conman51 wrote:Since when are APCs supposed to take on tanks with 30mm cannons?
Scimmy is still lethal as hellz against INF/light vehicles, which it is designed for (at least in PR).

CrazyHotMilf: can you release PR 1.0 today cause its my birthday and i want to play it ? because its gonna be very nice and every thing
-
K4on
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 5055
- Joined: 2009-05-08 19:48
Re: Rate of fire on APCs
Thanks guys for answering the OPs question.
As said, the fire rates are realistic now, that is why they were nerfed.
As said, the fire rates are realistic now, that is why they were nerfed.
-
Rhino
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 47909
- Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00
Re: Rate of fire on APCs
Well to be truly realistic, they actually wouldn't be able to fire off 90 rounds in a min due to their ammo feeding system.[R-DEV]K4on wrote:Thanks guys for answering the OPs question.
As said, the fire rates are realistic now, that is why they were nerfed.



