Automatic Rifles OP

Chuva_RD
PR:BF2 Contributor
Posts: 300
Joined: 2013-03-30 18:51

Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Chuva_RD »

because in deployed mode it have awesome accuracy, you can spam 40 bullets almost in point. IMO it should be nerfed cause ARs perform the functions of marksman also. If it would lose accuracy when shooting it may be more interesting.

Reply if it was suggested in DEV-team before
Jacksonez__
Posts: 1090
Joined: 2013-07-28 13:19

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Jacksonez__ »

Add barrel change (PKM and mg3?) and overheating for AR and MG. Overheating should disable the weapon for good time. Some ARs are like automatic marksman rifles. It's ridiculous.
ComradeHX
Posts: 3294
Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by ComradeHX »

Chuva_RD wrote:because in deployed mode it have awesome accuracy, you can spam 40 bullets almost in point. IMO it should be nerfed cause ARs perform the functions of marksman also. If it would lose accuracy when shooting it may be more interesting.

Reply if it was suggested in DEV-team before
You have not seen pre-nerfed AR.

It was literally better than sniper rifle.
Frontliner
PR:BF2 Contributor
Posts: 1884
Joined: 2012-10-29 09:33

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Frontliner »

I wouldn't mind upward recoil being added to the deployed mode to make long range shots less likely to hit, I don't think it was doable to increase deviation with the amount of shots being fired.
VTRaptor: but i only stopped for less than 10 secs and that fucking awesome dude put 2 of them

]CIA[ SwampFox: well my definition of glitching is using an enemy kit to kill the enemy

Just_Dave: i have a list about PR players, and they r categorized by their skill

Para: You sir are an arse and not what the game or our community needs.

AlonTavor: Is that a German trying to make me concentrate?

Heavy Death: join PRTA instead - Teamwork is a must there.
Nate.
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3018
Joined: 2012-07-09 20:44

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Nate. »

Maybe a little less accuracy but muuuuuch better suppression (like, fire 5 round near window and the guy inside is shaking for solid 3 seconds).
Image
Hurricane
Posts: 167
Joined: 2008-04-27 11:31

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Hurricane »

Keep in mind that (light) machine guns are excellent ranged weapons (in terms of infantry combat) in real life too.
fecht_niko
Posts: 347
Joined: 2013-06-29 13:42

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by fecht_niko »

agree with Nate. would be an interesting change
ComradeHX
Posts: 3294
Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by ComradeHX »

Nate. wrote:Maybe a little less accuracy but muuuuuch better suppression (like, fire 5 round near window and the guy inside is shaking for solid 3 seconds).
What's the point of higher artificial suppression on LMG if you can't kill enemies much more effectively than with standard rifles?

Suppression from LMG works because you can see/hear a stream of mostly-accurate bullets; it tells you that you will die if you keep running out in the open.
Not because of some arbitrary amount of time when screen is blurry...

If one round from LMG does much heavier suppression than standard rifle; then how it is balanced with 45(the worst)-200 rounds?
SANGUE-RUIM
Posts: 1390
Joined: 2009-04-26 12:37

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by SANGUE-RUIM »

don't touch it, it's not broken

it already has huge time to setlle deviation
Unarmed Civilian
Posts: 135
Joined: 2010-04-10 08:51

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Unarmed Civilian »

SANGUE-RUIM, as someone who takes the AR and go solo around maps, exploiting the "standing with no place to deploy your AR but still firing in deployed mode", it does not surprise me that you don't want it to change.
(everybody does the deployed standing, but not everybody goes vanilla-solo with an AR)

I liked it more when it took sometime to adjust the sights, when the scope image was blurry and shaky. Better than current 5 seconds (or so) rule.
User avatar
Mats391
PR:BF2 Lead Developer
Posts: 7643
Joined: 2010-08-06 18:06

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Mats391 »

Unarmed Civilian wrote:I liked it more when it took sometime to adjust the sights, when the scope image was blurry and shaky. Better than current 5 seconds (or so) rule.
What do you mean? The deploy animations are the same as they always been. The settle time also did not change as far as i know. I think the ARs are fine. Obviously unscoped MGs are still the best to force people to use suppression, but the scoped ones are fine as well. :)
Unarmed Civilian
Posts: 135
Joined: 2010-04-10 08:51

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Unarmed Civilian »

[R-DEV]Mats391 wrote:What do you mean?
If I'm not mistaken, in an older version of PR, there were some VFX effects to impair your vision whenever you'd bring the scope to the eye. Like an eye adjustment to the new tunnel vision and zoom levels. It was more realistic than than aiming down sight and having to stare at your enemy for a few seconds.
Truism
Posts: 1189
Joined: 2008-07-27 13:52

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Truism »

You are mistaken. The closest thing was the placeholder graphics before the telescopic sight model was added, where it zoomed in on irons and blurre the periphery around where it blurs now, just without the scope.

On topic, it's an unpopular view, but the AR and GPMGs should be buffed. There is a reason that all infantry tactics have been built around these weapons for a century, and it's because they are the gods of the infantry fight. Frankly, their only disadvantage in real life is that they're godawefully heavy with ammo. Other than assaulting, there should be no circumstance where you ever want another conventional weapon, except sniping beyond 800m.

I wholeheartedly believe there's room for them to be better, and the only nerf I'd suggest is reserve ammo count to tie them to riflesquads.
SSGTSEAL <headshot M4> Osama

Counter-Terrorists Win!
User avatar
Mats391
PR:BF2 Lead Developer
Posts: 7643
Joined: 2010-08-06 18:06

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Mats391 »

Unarmed Civilian wrote:If I'm not mistaken, in an older version of PR, there were some VFX effects to impair your vision whenever you'd bring the scope to the eye. Like an eye adjustment to the new tunnel vision and zoom levels. It was more realistic than than aiming down sight and having to stare at your enemy for a few seconds.
Dont think anything like that was ever implemented. Only thing would be the 2d sights with black around the scope in previous versions. That made ARs and everything scoped have way more tunnelvision.
Jacksonez__
Posts: 1090
Joined: 2013-07-28 13:19

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Jacksonez__ »

Limit the ammunition? That would stop (or decrease) lone wolfing and ramboing around with AR/MG and encouraging teamwork and as said, highlighting the role of a rifleman and extra ammo or make the AR/MG guy run slower as he is carrying a lot of extra ammo.
Cpt.Future
Posts: 192
Joined: 2008-09-16 16:52

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Cpt.Future »

___SANGUE-RUIM___ wrote:don't touch it, it's not broken

it already has huge time to setlle deviation
Agreed. Don't nerf it, it's supposed to be powerful (it's that way IRL too).

The only annoying thing is that in the hip fire spray and pray world of PR CQB LMGs are OP as well. I see a lot of veteran players just running around with the SAW in close combat spraying everything down...
Image
Roque_THE_GAMER
Posts: 520
Joined: 2012-12-10 18:10

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Roque_THE_GAMER »

could be like in Forgotten hope, you can only ain deployed wile lying down and to defend you self you still can fire in the undeployed version but with alot more recoil
[align=center]Sorry i cant into English...
[/align]
ComradeHX
Posts: 3294
Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by ComradeHX »

Roque_THE_GAMER wrote:could be like in Forgotten hope, you can only ain deployed wile lying down and to defend you self you still can fire in the undeployed version but with alot more recoil
How do you deploy MG out of a window in FH2?

It's not a terrible idea to erase the whack-a-mole AR gunners; but is it worth it against realism?
Roque_THE_GAMER
Posts: 520
Joined: 2012-12-10 18:10

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Roque_THE_GAMER »

ComradeHX wrote:How do you deploy MG out of a window in FH2?

It's not a terrible idea to erase the whack-a-mole AR gunners; but is it worth it against realism?
you cant, but you still can hit something on the undeployed version.
[align=center]Sorry i cant into English...
[/align]
Wheres_my_chili
Posts: 240
Joined: 2011-07-31 23:35

Re: Automatic Rifles OP

Post by Wheres_my_chili »

Roque_THE_GAMER wrote:you cant, but you still can hit something on the undeployed version.
Not worth it. Elevated positions are very strong points of engagement. And more often than not thats from a window.
Post Reply

Return to “Infantry”