PPSh\TT-33

Post Reply
X-Alt
Posts: 1073
Joined: 2013-07-02 22:35

PPSh\TT-33

Post by X-Alt »

The 7.62x25 Tokarev round fired by these weapons does not seem to deal quite the damage against armor that it should, the PPsh honestly deserves a buff to the point it's extremely dangerous at CQB thanks to good armor piercing abilities. The damage as of now could be improved since the PPsh and TT-33 only see combat against targets with body armor, which should cause the bullet to not overpenetrate.

https://youtu.be/hNEi7NrAtqo
https://youtu.be/fCrF-8y1pj8

9mm
ObjectTemplate.create GenericProjectile 900
ObjectTemplate.material 3900
ObjectTemplate.damage 28
ObjectTemplate.minDamage 0.4
ObjectTemplate.DistToStartLoseDamage 45
ObjectTemplate.DistToMinDamage 160
ObjectTemplate.gravityModifier 1.0
include projectiles_common_small.tweak

7.62x25
ObjectTemplate.create GenericProjectile 762_25
ObjectTemplate.material 3762
ObjectTemplate.damage 26
ObjectTemplate.minDamage 0.4
ObjectTemplate.DistToStartLoseDamage 60
ObjectTemplate.DistToMinDamage 200
ObjectTemplate.gravityModifier 1.0
include projectiles_common.tweak

ObjectTemplate.create GenericProjectile 460_30
ObjectTemplate.material 3900
ObjectTemplate.damage 24
ObjectTemplate.minDamage 0.4
ObjectTemplate.DistToStartLoseDamage 80
ObjectTemplate.DistToMinDamage 200
ObjectTemplate.gravityModifier 1.0
include projectiles_common.tweak
Last edited by X-Alt on 2015-08-14 16:08, edited 1 time in total.
M42 Zwilling
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 613
Joined: 2012-06-10 11:27

Re: PPSh\TT-33

Post by M42 Zwilling »

Not sure about other armies, but the US military at least uses body armor that protects to Type IV standard, i.e. against a .30-06 AP round at point blank. A 7.62x25 would not pose much of an issue, so I wouldn't see much of a reason to give it less damage loss vs. armor. Its kinetic energy is also very similar to a 9mm, not different enough from other pistol-caliber rounds to justify a base damage increase either IMO. :)
Image


"How many posts have there been about how much better PR was back in 0.X? The fact is that if we played the older versions we would start to remember the shortcomings, but we tend to hold onto the good memories tighter than the bad ones." - Murphy
X-Alt
Posts: 1073
Joined: 2013-07-02 22:35

Re: PPSh\TT-33

Post by X-Alt »

[R-DEV]M42 Zwilling wrote:Not sure about other armies, but the US military at least uses body armor that protects to Type IV standard, i.e. against a .30-06 AP round at point blank. A 7.62x25 would not pose much of an issue, so I wouldn't see much of a reason to give it less damage loss vs. armor. Its kinetic energy is also very similar to a 9mm, not different enough from other pistol-caliber rounds to justify a base damage increase either IMO. :)
Alrighty then, thanks for the insight.
Post Reply

Return to “Infantry”