Servers without battlerecorder
-
exel82
- Posts: 45
- Joined: 2016-06-12 22:15
Servers without battlerecorder
I'm tired of servers that have no battlerecorder. On these servers hackers, griefers and whatnot can go freely about their business and do whatever they want. There aren't many servers that don't have battlerecorder but I think that getting a server license requires BR on the server, because this will ensure that the servers stay clean of any griefers, hackers etc. The must have battlerecorder rule could be passed on training servers and CO-OP servers in my opinion.
-
Fir3w411
- Posts: 341
- Joined: 2014-03-01 17:56
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
Some servers right now run without BR and are a cesspool for cheaters.
Seriously needs to be forced to run a server.
Seriously needs to be forced to run a server.

"Sometimes you just gotta use torture tactics."
-
Vista
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: 2011-04-30 10:36
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
Yep I agree. Should be mandatory to have BR running.
-
AlauraLoveless
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 2011-12-30 16:30
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
I disagree, who say's people have to have something on that ruins the fun for the majority, maybe cheating is the only thing that people can enjoy, if they aren't harming you via malware or hacks or something that do harm to your system, then cheating in its own right isn't bad and having a software that records them doing it makes it even worse.
-
camo
- PR:BF2 Developer
- Posts: 3165
- Joined: 2013-01-26 09:00
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
It doesn't harm anyone by having BR running, unless you assume that the majority of people are cheating?AlauraLoveless wrote:I disagree, who say's people have to have something on that ruins the fun for the majority
lol i haven't even seen cheaters feeling sorry for themselves before.AlauraLoveless wrote:maybe cheating is the only thing that people can enjoy, if they aren't harming you via malware or hacks or something that do harm to your system, then cheating in its own right isn't bad and having a software that records them doing it makes it even worse.
-
viirusiiseli
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: 2012-02-29 23:53
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
I disagree. Getting shot through multiple bushes or HE shelled in complete cover sucks. Even more so when you know who it is and know that the person is hacking, but not being able to catch them.AlauraLoveless wrote:if they aren't harming you.
BR doesnt stop hackers, but it does make the hacks useless. Having to be careful about getting caught puts you at a disadvantage over a good player whos not hacking.
That being said, do you prefer ESP or normal WH? I'd totally wanna do some hacks with you. Just send me your in-game details and hash.
Yours truly,
TOTALLY_NOT_HACKER_POLICE
-
SuperArmy
- Posts: 578
- Joined: 2007-10-12 18:16
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
You are a Server Administrator and you said this?AlauraLoveless wrote:I disagree, who say's people have to have something on that ruins the fun for the majority, maybe cheating is the only thing that people can enjoy, if they aren't harming you via malware or hacks or something that do harm to your system, then cheating in its own right isn't bad and having a software that records them doing it makes it even worse.
Im sure this violates your SA license agreement.
-
LiamBai
- Posts: 898
- Joined: 2013-03-19 19:09
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
Better not make him angry or he might ban you from his server.SuperArmy wrote:You are a Server Administrator and you said this?
Im sure this violates your SA license agreement.
[url='http://tournament.realitymod.com']
[/url]
Liam: $ mkdir .ssh && chmod 700 .ssh
Vista: $: command not found
[/url]Liam: $ mkdir .ssh && chmod 700 .ssh
Vista: $: command not found
-
SuperArmy
- Posts: 578
- Joined: 2007-10-12 18:16
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
Not fussed. He can ban who he wants. His server.[R-CON]LiamBai wrote:Better not make him angry or he might ban you from his server.
I just don't get butt hurt that easily
-
Vista
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: 2011-04-30 10:36
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
Liam coming in with the advanced banter
-
YAK-R
- Posts: 335
- Joined: 2012-07-07 15:04
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
............. can't be seriousAlauraLoveless wrote:if they aren't harming you via malware or hacks or something that do harm to your system, then cheating in its own right isn't bad and having a software that records them doing it makes it even worse.
I very very very rarely get killed and think, gee that was unfair, or gee that was a bit dodgy. Maybe its because i play with 250 ping, and the bullshit moments come so often in infantry combat.
Project reality really is an experience game, cheating would just suck all the fun out. I don't understand why players with decent PC's set everything to as low as possible, changing lighting settings, removing foliage etc.. just to try and get a few extra kills and make themselves look better, this individualist attitude really isn't in the spirit of the game.
I do appreciate the work that virus and crew put in catching cheaters, BR is obviously a vital tool. Even if he gets it wrong sometimes

-
viirusiiseli
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: 2012-02-29 23:53
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
YAK-R wrote:I do appreciate the work that virus and crew put in catching cheaters, BR is obviously a vital tool. Even if he gets it wrong sometimes![]()
Shhhh...
-
YAK-R
- Posts: 335
- Joined: 2012-07-07 15:04
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
Offtopic, but yeah it was jabal. But not skirmish, i was sitting on an AA or TOW or something near the bridge, you parachuted in behind me, tried to pistol me.... i got off and knifed youviirusiiseli wrote:Shhhh...ops: That was Jabal skirmish wasn't it?
-
blacktea65
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 2013-10-12 21:23
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
Yeah sure...SuperArmy wrote:Not fussed. He can ban who he wants. His server.
I just don't get butt hurt that easily![]()

-
Mouthpiece
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: 2010-05-24 10:18
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
Not sure if trolling or serious. If trolling... ugh, get a good rope and use some soap on it so it doesn't hurt that much.AlauraLoveless wrote:I disagree, who say's people have to have something on that ruins the fun for the majority, maybe cheating is the only thing that people can enjoy, if they aren't harming you via malware or hacks or something that do harm to your system, then cheating in its own right isn't bad and having a software that records them doing it makes it even worse.
-
mectus11
- PR:BF2 Developer
- Posts: 805
- Joined: 2015-09-05 19:44
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
AlauraLoveless wrote:I disagree, who say's people have to have something on that ruins the fun for the majority, maybe cheating is the only thing that people can enjoy, if they aren't harming you via malware or hacks or something that do harm to your system, then cheating in its own right isn't bad and having a software that records them doing it makes it even worse.



-
Fastjack
- PR:BF2 Contributor
- Posts: 525
- Joined: 2011-09-04 19:47
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
Woot?! That's an joke!???AlauraLoveless wrote:I disagree, who say's people have to have something on that ruins the fun for the majority, maybe cheating is the only thing that people can enjoy, if they aren't harming you via malware or hacks or something that do harm to your system, then cheating in its own right isn't bad and having a software that records them doing it makes it even worse.
-
celticalliance
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 2011-05-10 10:46
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
Uhm, so private servers like ours, mainly used by members of a clan that mainly plays Arma 2 / Arma 3 and occasionally plays PR for fun, must have BattleRecorder enabled to keep their licence?
Odd, very odd.
Odd, very odd.
- Mineral
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: 2012-01-02 12:37
- Location: Belgium
Re: Servers without battlerecorder
No they don't. No such rule exist now and is unlikely to be added .



