did we get around the vehicle thing?

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
A-10Warthog
Posts: 1911
Joined: 2007-01-03 01:28

did we get around the vehicle thing?

Post by A-10Warthog »

look http://idf.planetbattlefield.gamespy.co ... name=Dovra

it seems like they got around the thing ware a vehicle cant go on/inside another vehicle. if so that means good news for alotta mod teams
A-10, EX PR Tester, Moderator, Public Relations.

.

Image

from [R-DEV]CodeRedFox: "Fixing bugs creates more bugs"
blud
Posts: 1246
Joined: 2006-09-04 22:22

Post by blud »

Just because they have pictures of it doesn't mean it doesn't run like **** and jitter all over the place.
A-10Warthog
Posts: 1911
Joined: 2007-01-03 01:28

Post by A-10Warthog »

well we dont know that now do we lol
A-10, EX PR Tester, Moderator, Public Relations.

.

Image

from [R-DEV]CodeRedFox: "Fixing bugs creates more bugs"
Cyber-Couch
Posts: 428
Joined: 2006-12-03 03:13

Post by Cyber-Couch »

Gots to steal their informations.
Desertfox
Posts: 5886
Joined: 2006-08-15 06:41

Post by Desertfox »

WE MUST SEND IN ZE SPYImage
Image
PaveHawk
Posts: 240
Joined: 2005-10-28 08:09

Post by PaveHawk »

I'm sure the dev team is aware of this seeing as both mods are part of Black Sand Studios.
Image
Desertfox
Posts: 5886
Joined: 2006-08-15 06:41

Post by Desertfox »

PaveHawk wrote:I'm sure the dev team is aware of this seeing as both mods are part of Black Sand Studios.
Fear not eggman! I will post the below message on your behalf:


;)
Image
A-10Warthog
Posts: 1911
Joined: 2007-01-03 01:28

Post by A-10Warthog »

yea, i was lookin at the other mods in bss since brickfield was added so i was takin a look and i came across that, i hope its true
A-10, EX PR Tester, Moderator, Public Relations.

.

Image

from [R-DEV]CodeRedFox: "Fixing bugs creates more bugs"
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

plz note: http://idf.planetbattlefield.gamespy.co ... RA_IG4.jpg

no vehicles on it.

also it would be possible to have the vehile spawn onto the base of it, and have its physics locked and basicly hoocked onto the boat, and it would follow the boat where ever it went. BUT if a player decied he wanted to get into the tank, the physcis lock would become undone and all hell would brake loose.
Image
Clypp
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2006-07-17 18:36

Post by Clypp »

'[R-DEV wrote:Rhino']plz note: http://idf.planetbattlefield.gamespy.co ... RA_IG4.jpg

no vehicles on it.

also it would be possible to have the vehile spawn onto the base of it, and have its physics locked and basicly hoocked onto the boat, and it would follow the boat where ever it went. BUT if a player decied he wanted to get into the tank, the physcis lock would become undone and all hell would brake loose.
That sounds somewhat promising for naval assaults. If only the tank could be locked until the ship comes to a stop or reaches a certain zone...
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

Clypp wrote:That sounds somewhat promising for naval assaults. If only the tank could be locked until the ship comes to a stop or reaches a certain zone...
even if it was stopped, i think it would still have a very bad effect.... just not as much.
Image
NavalLord
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-02-14 17:39

Post by NavalLord »

Forgotten Hope had this. Tanks and APCs would spawn on the LCT. They jittered about a bit, but it still worked.
Image
Hitperson
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 6733
Joined: 2005-11-08 08:09

Post by Hitperson »

'[R-DEV wrote:Rhino']even if it was stopped, i think it would still have a very bad effect.... just not as much.

i remember the trampoline hmmwv's in the test video's you guys released.
Image
Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down"
Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon."
M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks"
[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."
Clypp
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2006-07-17 18:36

Post by Clypp »

NavalLord wrote:Forgotten Hope had this. Tanks and APCs would spawn on the LCT. They jittered about a bit, but it still worked.
That was in the BF1942 engine. That engine was much better for vehicle collusions. You could take off from moving carriers and stand on aircraft wings without the jitter and spontaneous combustion BF2 has.
NavalLord
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-02-14 17:39

Post by NavalLord »

Oh, I was under the impression that the Battlefield 2 engine was more advanced and had built upon the BF42 engine-- oh that's right, we're talking about BF2, and Dice, and EA. Never mind then. It all makes sense now.
Image
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

i was thinking in something like this :

-when you fly, the bomb model is merge to the plane but when you drop the bomb , the model "disappears" and a bomb spawn in the midle of the air ; now replace the plane with the ship, and the bomb with the tank :) , also you can make the fire botton (when you spawn the tank ) only capable to fire when the ship is near the coast , dont know if is possible :/
A-10Warthog
Posts: 1911
Joined: 2007-01-03 01:28

Post by A-10Warthog »

what if you made it so you could lock it and vehicles would spawn on it and if someone would try to drive the boat stuff would stop spawning or something?
A-10, EX PR Tester, Moderator, Public Relations.

.

Image

from [R-DEV]CodeRedFox: "Fixing bugs creates more bugs"
Leo
Posts: 2082
Joined: 2006-11-29 00:40

Post by Leo »

77SiCaRiO77 wrote:i was thinking in something like this :

-when you fly, the bomb model is merge to the plane but when you drop the bomb , the model "disappears" and a bomb spawn in the midle of the air ; now replace the plane with the ship, and the bomb with the tank :) , also you can make the fire botton (when you spawn the tank ) only capable to fire when the ship is near the coast , dont know if is possible :/
Yea, but the bombs aren't drivable, which leads me to my next point, can we get a kit where you sit on the falling bomb with a cowboy hat in your hand? Just saying, morale booster.
ArmedDrunk&Angry
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2006-07-14 07:10

Post by ArmedDrunk&Angry »

with custom words written on the nose of the bomb ?
And as the windshield melts
My tears evaporate
Leaving only charcoal to defend.
Finally I understand the feelings of the few.
DaedalusAI1
Posts: 62
Joined: 2007-02-14 03:39

Post by DaedalusAI1 »

Leo wrote:Yea, but the bombs aren't drivable, which leads me to my next point, can we get a kit where you sit on the falling bomb with a cowboy hat in your hand? Just saying, morale booster.
Also on the bomb thing, we need the abillity to place C4 on to people so they can run in and blow themselves up!! Jihad!
Bunny from Platoon "... I get this bad feeling. I told the padre the truth man, I like it here. Get to do what you want, nobody f#@%$ with you. The only worry you got is dying. And if that happens you won't know about it anyway..." :m1helmet:
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”