I think you guys should up the QBZ's sounds. They sound so wimpy and pathetic
It fires the same ammo as the M-16 and the SA80, yet it sounds so weak...
Make it sound like a real weapon with an actually audible "BANG".
mate the m16 doesnt have a big or tough caliber , when my moms BF was in the amry they ussed to have FN herstal Falls... and on 1 mission thingy they met up with soldiers from US .. and boy they were jelous... they wanted to have weapons like that also... and btw.. the m16 is partly made ouf of plastic, you cant use it as a ram for instance..'[R-PUB wrote:Demio']Hey,
I think you guys should up the QBZ's sounds. They sound so wimpy and pathetic
It fires the same ammo as the M-16 and the SA80, yet it sounds so weak...
Make it sound like a real weapon with an actually audible "BANG".![]()

When I first heard a M14 firing i thought "OMG there's some enemy like 5m from me" lolMekstizzle wrote:Actually, it fires a slightly more powerful round. So it should sound even louder i'm guessing! We need more gun sounds like the M14 - now that's what you call a gun sound!![]()

Guerra wrote:Hmm. I really like the sound effects for most of the guns. With the exception of the recycled ones from vanilla BF2.
Creative X-Fi sound card and full surround logitech z-5300e speakers. WOW it sounds incredible.
(To anyone who doesn't have surround or a good sound card, invest. Image is only half. When you put BF2 on "ULTRA" sound, you just can't go back. Sounds like there is a battle at your house and everyone's invited.
FN herstal falls? falls? I'm familiar with FN, but which weapon are you referring too? Also the M16 is not partly made of plastic. The buttstock is some sort of composite and is very tough. It's not as tough as metal, but certainly can't be compared to simple plastic.arthuro12 wrote:mate the m16 doesnt have a big or tough caliber , when my moms BF was in the amry they ussed to have FN herstal Falls... and on 1 mission thingy they met up with soldiers from US .. and boy they were jelous... they wanted to have weapons like that also... and btw.. the m16 is partly made ouf of plastic, you cant use it as a ram for instance..
-arthur
but i agree the sound sounds a bit weak... might look to BF2 modern combat... nice sounds in that!
yeah p.r. still has vanilla fragments left..'[R-PUB wrote:Demio']Hey,
I think you guys should up the QBZ's sounds. They sound so wimpy and pathetic
It fires the same ammo as the M-16 and the SA80, yet it sounds so weak...
Make it sound like a real weapon with an actually audible "BANG".![]()
77SiCaRiO77 wrote:ask him if he is an enemy , if he answer you in other language, then fire at him
FAL. Well, I guess thats what he means. Probubly played JA2 too much with the "help I've FALen" in the weapon descriptionDetermined wrote:FN herstal falls? falls? I'm familiar with FN, but which weapon are you referring too? Also the M16 is not partly made of plastic. The buttstock is some sort of composite and is very tough. It's not as tough as metal, but certainly can't be compared to simple plastic.
Oh, and the "power" of the round doesn't always translate into louder report.
That was how many years ago? lolBob_Marley wrote:FAL. Well, I guess thats what he means. Probubly played JA2 too much with the "help I've FALen" in the weapon description![]()
Anyway, remember people recount the old horror stories of M16s in Vietnam where marines/soldiers would use it as a culb only to have the stock fall off when they hit someone.
Not completely correct. The round is 5.8 instead of 5.56, but it is much shorter than the standard 5.56 round (don't remeber how much off the top of my head). It is also about 20% lighter, meaning less pure energy, but the chinese claim it has superior armor piercing abilities.Mekstizzle wrote:Actually, it fires a slightly more powerful round. So it should sound even louder i'm guessing! We need more gun sounds like the M14 - now that's what you call a gun sound!![]()

The cartridge is 5.8 x 42mm; .223 Remington/5.56mm NATO cartridge is 5.56 x 45mm. Always find independent tests before you take the Chinese claims seriously. However, sources report the weight of the basic 5.8mm rifle projectile at 4.5 grams (maybe about 5 grams for the projectile used in the DMR and MGs). The standard military ball projectile for the M855/SS109 5.56mm NATO cartridge is about 3.97 grams. Doesn't sound like much of a difference until you take into account impact velocity, which has yet to be independently tested, AFAIK.Figisaacnewton wrote:Not completely correct. The round is 5.8 instead of 5.56, but it is much shorter than the standard 5.56 round (don't remeber how much off the top of my head). It is also about 20% lighter, meaning less pure energy, but the chinese claim it has superior armor piercing abilities.
Well, 7.62mm is/was used in varying lengths in the same weapons for ages. When the USSR made the switch to 5.45mm they even came out with a pistol cartridge in that caliber. It's a logistical decision. These aren't all the same rounds, remember. The cartridges used for the pistol and SMG are 5.8 x 21mm.Terranova wrote:Well something must be fantastic about the 5.8mm ammunition, it seems like every new firearm that appears on Sinodefence is adopting the 5.8mm ammo, everything from SMGs, LMGs and Sniper Rifles.