Spec Ops v0.6?
-
zizler
- Posts: 71
- Joined: 2006-07-24 16:00
Spec Ops v0.6?
Will SF soldier be altered in this future release? I'm just curious because I tried to find any info it but couldn't find any. Because I hope the spec ops gets better equipment for behind enemy lines kinda stuff.

-
G.Drew
- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 2006-04-30 23:02
-
Gaz
- Posts: 9032
- Joined: 2004-09-23 10:19
As it stands currently, you can decipher it as this:
Get rid of it - 23.17%
Make it into a limited or more 'specialist' kit - 63.41%
Leave it alone - 13.41%
Get rid of it - 23.17%
Make it into a limited or more 'specialist' kit - 63.41%
Leave it alone - 13.41%
"By profession I am a soldier, and take pride in that fact. But I am prouder, infinitely prouder, to be a father". - Gen Douglas MacAurthur.
-Proud wearer of motorcycle helmets since 1998.
-
zizler
- Posts: 71
- Joined: 2006-07-24 16:00
My main class is spec ops. I usually go behind enemy lines and then destroy rp's, assets bridges. I'm definitely no n00b. Sometimes lone wolf because I can't use a whole squad when I'm sneaking up to RP's. It's a winning tactic. The only times I won on hills of hamyong is because I destroyed every single RP on the map, including the ones in the back where everyone can spawn. I just hoped maybe spec ops could get more of a purpose besides doing that and being an infantry pawn class.

-
Master Shake
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 2007-02-23 13:02
Give them these.... http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/20 ... orces.html
See the article link above first-- Vid of something similar-- http://www.metacafe.com/watch/468993/jetman/
See the article link above first-- Vid of something similar-- http://www.metacafe.com/watch/468993/jetman/
It's hard to be humble when your as great as I am....
-
VipersGhost
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: 2007-03-27 18:34
-
Wasteland
- Posts: 4611
- Joined: 2006-11-07 04:44
Are you serious dude? He was joking. LOL. It's PReality, not PFantasy.
But seriously, that first link didn't work. Second one was cool. I wish I knew how he was controlling it. Just manipulating his body, or with flaps on the wing or something.
EDIT: OK, got the link working.
But seriously, that first link didn't work. Second one was cool. I wish I knew how he was controlling it. Just manipulating his body, or with flaps on the wing or something.
EDIT: OK, got the link working.
Originally Posted by: ArmedDrunk&Angry
we don't live in your fantastical world where you are the super hero sent to release us all from the bondage of ignorance
Originally Posted by: [R-MOD]dunehunter
don't mess with wasteland, a scary guy will drag you into an alleyway and rape you with a baseballbat
we don't live in your fantastical world where you are the super hero sent to release us all from the bondage of ignorance
Originally Posted by: [R-MOD]dunehunter
don't mess with wasteland, a scary guy will drag you into an alleyway and rape you with a baseballbat
-
vanity
- Posts: 562
- Joined: 2007-02-08 12:57
The SF only carries 2 SLAMS, so where are you reloading to continue your backline bonanza?zizler wrote:My main class is spec ops. I usually go behind enemy lines and then destroy rp's, assets bridges. I'm definitely no n00b. Sometimes lone wolf because I can't use a whole squad when I'm sneaking up to RP's. It's a winning tactic. The only times I won on hills of hamyong is because I destroyed every single RP on the map, including the ones in the back where everyone can spawn. I just hoped maybe spec ops could get more of a purpose besides doing that and being an infantry pawn class.
-
BLind
- Posts: 146
- Joined: 2005-11-07 22:36
exactly. the only people who take spec ops are those who want to spray with the m4. If you want to blow stuff up and cuase havoc behnd enemy lines then engineer is far more effiecient, and any class can be stealthy, theres really no excuse. Thats why if any1 dares take spec ops in one my squads they fined themselves kicked instantly.

-
Nickbond592
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: 2007-01-30 18:16
-
vanity
- Posts: 562
- Joined: 2007-02-08 12:57
If people want the m4, that's fine by me. I think it's a pea-shooter and the lack of armor puts them at a serious disadvantage. They won't survive against the G3 or AK in any engagement. But I honestly do question this "behind the lines operative" spiel we get every so often. Who's resupplying them after every destroyed asset?
*NVM - "ememy jeeps, apc, enemy ammobags, ammodump, rifleman buddy ,supply crate"
*NVM - "ememy jeeps, apc, enemy ammobags, ammodump, rifleman buddy ,supply crate"
-
{GD}Snake13
- Posts: 142
- Joined: 2005-09-09 13:52
Thats rather foolish, I take specops sometimes because I find I can get head shot people very effectively with the red dot, and the auto helps in close quarters. Do you kick people with the AT kit because they just want to kill vehicles?'[R-CON wrote:BLind']exactly. the only people who take spec ops are those who want to spray with the m4. If you want to blow stuff up and cuase havoc behnd enemy lines then engineer is far more effiecient, and any class can be stealthy, theres really no excuse. Thats why if any1 dares take spec ops in one my squads they fined themselves kicked instantly.

-
gazzthompson
- Posts: 8012
- Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05
-
zeroburrito
- Posts: 101
- Joined: 2007-03-18 00:18
body armor and no body armor is the same against an ak or g3. its better to have no armor versing the insurgents and mec.vanity wrote:If people want the m4, that's fine by me. I think it's a pea-shooter and the lack of armor puts them at a serious disadvantage. They won't survive against the G3 or AK in any engagement. But I honestly do question this "behind the lines operative" spiel we get every so often. Who's resupplying them after every destroyed asset?
*NVM - "ememy jeeps, apc, enemy ammobags, ammodump, rifleman buddy ,supply crate"
-
zeroburrito
- Posts: 101
- Joined: 2007-03-18 00:18




