Spec Ops v0.6?

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
zizler
Posts: 71
Joined: 2006-07-24 16:00

Spec Ops v0.6?

Post by zizler »

Will SF soldier be altered in this future release? I'm just curious because I tried to find any info it but couldn't find any. Because I hope the spec ops gets better equipment for behind enemy lines kinda stuff.
Image
G.Drew
Posts: 4417
Joined: 2006-04-30 23:02

Post by G.Drew »

Image
Image

[R-COM]BloodBane611: I do like the old school rape...However, it's a bit awkward to be a white boy blasting the old school in public....
duckhunt
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3314
Joined: 2005-08-28 18:20

Post by duckhunt »

wow those poll results are pracically even lol
Gaz
Posts: 9032
Joined: 2004-09-23 10:19

Post by Gaz »

As it stands currently, you can decipher it as this:

Get rid of it - 23.17%

Make it into a limited or more 'specialist' kit - 63.41%

Leave it alone - 13.41%
Image
"By profession I am a soldier, and take pride in that fact. But I am prouder, infinitely prouder, to be a father". - Gen Douglas MacAurthur.
-Proud wearer of motorcycle helmets since 1998.
eggman
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 11721
Joined: 2005-12-27 04:52

Post by eggman »

It's pretty much left alone, tho not really because the other classes and class system is changing around it. It's the vanilla lone wolf n00b class :p
[COLOR=#007700][COLOR=DarkGreen]C[COLOR=Olive]heers!
egg[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]

Image
zizler
Posts: 71
Joined: 2006-07-24 16:00

Post by zizler »

My main class is spec ops. I usually go behind enemy lines and then destroy rp's, assets bridges. I'm definitely no n00b. Sometimes lone wolf because I can't use a whole squad when I'm sneaking up to RP's. It's a winning tactic. The only times I won on hills of hamyong is because I destroyed every single RP on the map, including the ones in the back where everyone can spawn. I just hoped maybe spec ops could get more of a purpose besides doing that and being an infantry pawn class.
Image
Master Shake
Posts: 159
Joined: 2007-02-23 13:02

Post by Master Shake »

Give them these.... http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/20 ... orces.html


See the article link above first-- Vid of something similar-- http://www.metacafe.com/watch/468993/jetman/
Image

It's hard to be humble when your as great as I am....
VipersGhost
Posts: 1171
Joined: 2007-03-27 18:34

Post by VipersGhost »

WOW! Those wing insertions would be AWESOME! We should def try and get those in the game!
Wasteland
Posts: 4611
Joined: 2006-11-07 04:44

Post by Wasteland »

Are you serious dude? He was joking. LOL. It's PReality, not PFantasy.

But seriously, that first link didn't work. Second one was cool. I wish I knew how he was controlling it. Just manipulating his body, or with flaps on the wing or something.

EDIT: OK, got the link working.
Originally Posted by: ArmedDrunk&Angry
we don't live in your fantastical world where you are the super hero sent to release us all from the bondage of ignorance
Originally Posted by: [R-MOD]dunehunter
don't mess with wasteland, a scary guy will drag you into an alleyway and rape you with a baseballbat
vanity
Posts: 562
Joined: 2007-02-08 12:57

Post by vanity »

zizler wrote:My main class is spec ops. I usually go behind enemy lines and then destroy rp's, assets bridges. I'm definitely no n00b. Sometimes lone wolf because I can't use a whole squad when I'm sneaking up to RP's. It's a winning tactic. The only times I won on hills of hamyong is because I destroyed every single RP on the map, including the ones in the back where everyone can spawn. I just hoped maybe spec ops could get more of a purpose besides doing that and being an infantry pawn class.
The SF only carries 2 SLAMS, so where are you reloading to continue your backline bonanza?
BLind
Posts: 146
Joined: 2005-11-07 22:36

Post by BLind »

exactly. the only people who take spec ops are those who want to spray with the m4. If you want to blow stuff up and cuase havoc behnd enemy lines then engineer is far more effiecient, and any class can be stealthy, theres really no excuse. Thats why if any1 dares take spec ops in one my squads they fined themselves kicked instantly.
Image
Nickbond592
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2713
Joined: 2007-01-30 18:16

Post by Nickbond592 »

ememy jeeps, apc, enemy ammobags, ammodump, rifleman buddy ,supply crate

seek and thus you shal findeth
Image


Smeg: Fuzz commands a lot and promotes good teamwork, db flips vehicles, Bosco is an all-round nub, Outlawz is an SP whore, Nickbond is a friggin ninja and Rhino gets kicked for being a n00b.
vanity
Posts: 562
Joined: 2007-02-08 12:57

Post by vanity »

If people want the m4, that's fine by me. I think it's a pea-shooter and the lack of armor puts them at a serious disadvantage. They won't survive against the G3 or AK in any engagement. But I honestly do question this "behind the lines operative" spiel we get every so often. Who's resupplying them after every destroyed asset?

*NVM - "ememy jeeps, apc, enemy ammobags, ammodump, rifleman buddy ,supply crate"
{GD}Snake13
Posts: 142
Joined: 2005-09-09 13:52

Post by {GD}Snake13 »

'[R-CON wrote:BLind']exactly. the only people who take spec ops are those who want to spray with the m4. If you want to blow stuff up and cuase havoc behnd enemy lines then engineer is far more effiecient, and any class can be stealthy, theres really no excuse. Thats why if any1 dares take spec ops in one my squads they fined themselves kicked instantly.
Thats rather foolish, I take specops sometimes because I find I can get head shot people very effectively with the red dot, and the auto helps in close quarters. Do you kick people with the AT kit because they just want to kill vehicles?
Image
gazzthompson
Posts: 8012
Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05

Post by gazzthompson »

i use spec ops on basrah to go behind enery lines and blow stuff up, i kept a tally of it all :P ...

spawn cars destroyed : 14
Trucks/sucide cars destroyed : 4
AAA destroyed : 3
ammo dumps : 2
Bikes:3
Tank(took a fair few goes):1

and only killed like 2 ppl , only shot when needed to.
zeroburrito
Posts: 101
Joined: 2007-03-18 00:18

Post by zeroburrito »

vanity wrote:If people want the m4, that's fine by me. I think it's a pea-shooter and the lack of armor puts them at a serious disadvantage. They won't survive against the G3 or AK in any engagement. But I honestly do question this "behind the lines operative" spiel we get every so often. Who's resupplying them after every destroyed asset?

*NVM - "ememy jeeps, apc, enemy ammobags, ammodump, rifleman buddy ,supply crate"
body armor and no body armor is the same against an ak or g3. its better to have no armor versing the insurgents and mec.
vanity
Posts: 562
Joined: 2007-02-08 12:57

Post by vanity »

O RLY? I didnt know that.
zeroburrito
Posts: 101
Joined: 2007-03-18 00:18

Post by zeroburrito »

yea it sucks..i hate facing the G3..USMC has a huge disadvantage in soldier equipment(erased on basrah from all their assets). but the other maps with no airpower both teams being equal in skill, mec wins every time.
Cherni
Posts: 1308
Joined: 2006-08-19 23:23

Post by Cherni »

Well, maybe make the M4 only have single shot.


Take that noob sprayers
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”