Option #1 for planes
MiG-21
Vietnam-area ground attack plane
Option #2 for planes
MiG-29
Q-5
Option 3 for planes
MEC/PLAAF pilots will fly airstrike operations against US/UK.
Why? Because the US/UK is against every other team.

An insurgent would. They would have more too win. Hummer loaded with an VBIED pulls up too a check point. Americans think nothing of it, than BOOM!'[R-PUB wrote:Garabaldi']Nobody in their right mind would drive a hostile vehicle through a warzone.
You'd get your *** lit up by friendlies.
This might make sense, except the Taliban were not insurgents, until 2001 when their air force was destroyed and Kabul fell. Then they became insurgents.nsurgents actually had airforce , atleast Afghani Taliban had MiG-23 , MiG-27, Su-22 , Su-24 and some other russian-made jets left from communist pro-USSR goverment of Afghanistan , which falled in 1992 ( might be 1990 , can't remember exactly ) . Though they were destroyed on the ground in first days of US campain in 2001 .
Fishw0rk wrote:lol give them a crop duster with bombs attached.
THAT would be funny.
The most I can see in terms of air vehicles for them would be a captured civilian helicopter used exclusively for transport (no weapons). Perhaps a captured news choppers?
Ecko wrote:An insurgent would. They would have more too win. Hummer loaded with an VBIED pulls up too a check point. Americans think nothing of it, than BOOM!
But a USMC soldier using a Civ car would be stupid.
Actually the HMMWV is an automatic. Just saying that it is actually easier to drive than a HiLux technical.MADTKBOY wrote:not to mention the ability to drive a humvee, which isnt any more complicated to drive away and use than any other car with a steering wheel, shifter, and three pedals once you kill all its occupants...
After all, they are supposed to bring asymetrical warfare into the game, Think they'd care about friendly id issues so long as they can get their hands on superior equipment?