"The enemy of my enemy is my freind"

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.

What do you think about this?

Eh, no. MEC/PLA have limited resources
0
No votes
Definately! MEC/PLA always help their friends!
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 0

TF6049
Posts: 584
Joined: 2007-03-29 03:24

"The enemy of my enemy is my freind"

Post by TF6049 »

Shouldn't the Militia/Insurgents have technology (planes, tanks, weapons, etc...) from the MEC/PLA? 8-)

Option #1 for planes
MiG-21
Vietnam-area ground attack plane

Option #2 for planes
MiG-29
Q-5

Option 3 for planes
MEC/PLAAF pilots will fly airstrike operations against US/UK.

Why? Because the US/UK is against every other team. 8-)
Sam Hoy
Posts: 54
Joined: 2006-11-25 17:09

Post by Sam Hoy »

Now all they need are airfields, fuels, munitions, spare parts, pilots, maintance crews and some miracle so that they don't get shot down by American planes and their runways and storage facilities aren't bombed.

Aside from that it is not realistic at all, do the insurgents in Iraq, lets say, have planes? If these factions wanted to give material aide they would send RPGs and AK-Ms.

In short, no, not a good idea, and this has been discussed before.
Woody
Posts: 300
Joined: 2006-08-05 20:44

Post by Woody »

Ask yourself this:
Do you see the Insurgents flying around in MiGs in Iraq right now?
lol
Image
Desertfox
Posts: 5886
Joined: 2006-08-15 06:41

Post by Desertfox »

I don't think ahkmed has the proper training to fly a mig!
Image
Guerra norte
Posts: 1666
Joined: 2006-07-19 17:37

Post by Guerra norte »

Shouldn't the Militia/Insurgents have technology (planes, tanks, weapons, etc...)
The whole point of the insurgent/militia faction was to introduce asymmetrical warfare, if the get all the fancy stuff the organized armies have they kind of lose their purpose.
charliegrs
Posts: 2027
Joined: 2007-01-17 02:19

Post by charliegrs »

the tamil tigers have an "airforce" and they successfully bombed some indonesian military recently lol.....

but regardless i still cant believe people suggest this idea.
Expendable Grunt
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2007-03-09 01:54

Post by Expendable Grunt »

No, though I do think Millitia should have *some* captured US/GB/MEC(?) stuff, like bandages and or C4 perhaps...
Image


Former [DM] captain.

The fact that people are poor or discriminated against doesn't necessarily endow them with any special qualities of justice, nobility, charity or compassion. - Saul Alinsky
MADTKBOY
Posts: 76
Joined: 2007-02-24 22:29

Post by MADTKBOY »

not to mention the ability to drive a humvee, which isnt any more complicated to drive away and use than any other car with a steering wheel, shifter, and three pedals once you kill all its occupants...

After all, they are supposed to bring asymetrical warfare into the game, Think they'd care about friendly id issues so long as they can get their hands on superior equipment?
causticbeat
Posts: 1070
Joined: 2006-07-27 06:02

Post by causticbeat »

lol give the militia a stuka or something
[PR]AC3421
Posts: 994
Joined: 2006-11-06 01:40

Post by [PR]AC3421 »

What skins are the Militia using?? All new ones?? Just curious as I have never come up on a discussion covering this yet.
Longbow*
Posts: 496
Joined: 2007-03-10 03:00

Post by Longbow* »

First of all , MiG-21 have never been a ground attack jet . It is 2nd generation jet-fighter .
Second - insurgents actually had airforce , atleast Afghani Taliban had MiG-23 , MiG-27, Su-22 , Su-24 and some other russian-made jets left from communist pro-USSR goverment of Afghanistan , which falled in 1992 ( might be 1990 , can't remember exactly ) . Though they were destroyed on the ground in first days of US campain in 2001 .
Last edited by Longbow* on 2007-04-07 14:29, edited 1 time in total.
El_Vikingo
Posts: 4877
Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50

Post by El_Vikingo »

Some one correct the title!

Correct spelling:
Friend
Image

If you are reading this dont stop, cause if you do, I'll kick you in the balls.
Ecko
Posts: 925
Joined: 2006-11-28 22:49

Post by Ecko »

'[R-PUB wrote:Garabaldi']Nobody in their right mind would drive a hostile vehicle through a warzone.

You'd get your *** lit up by friendlies.
An insurgent would. They would have more too win. Hummer loaded with an VBIED pulls up too a check point. Americans think nothing of it, than BOOM!
But a USMC soldier using a Civ car would be stupid.
Image
AKA Ecko1987
Beep-Beep-Beep.
Sam Hoy
Posts: 54
Joined: 2006-11-25 17:09

Post by Sam Hoy »

nsurgents actually had airforce , atleast Afghani Taliban had MiG-23 , MiG-27, Su-22 , Su-24 and some other russian-made jets left from communist pro-USSR goverment of Afghanistan , which falled in 1992 ( might be 1990 , can't remember exactly ) . Though they were destroyed on the ground in first days of US campain in 2001 .
This might make sense, except the Taliban were not insurgents, until 2001 when their air force was destroyed and Kabul fell. Then they became insurgents.
ArmedDrunk&Angry
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2006-07-14 07:10

Post by ArmedDrunk&Angry »

whatever..............give them the cessna from OFP...
And as the windshield melts
My tears evaporate
Leaving only charcoal to defend.
Finally I understand the feelings of the few.
causticbeat
Posts: 1070
Joined: 2006-07-27 06:02

Post by causticbeat »

Fishw0rk wrote:lol give them a crop duster with bombs attached. ;)

THAT would be funny.

The most I can see in terms of air vehicles for them would be a captured civilian helicopter used exclusively for transport (no weapons). Perhaps a captured news choppers?


i was actually thinking that, could be neat.

you could always give them a 747 but id assume thats a touchy subject
causticbeat
Posts: 1070
Joined: 2006-07-27 06:02

Post by causticbeat »

Ecko wrote:An insurgent would. They would have more too win. Hummer loaded with an VBIED pulls up too a check point. Americans think nothing of it, than BOOM!
But a USMC soldier using a Civ car would be stupid.

Erm, they wouldnt be a bit suspicious of the lone muslim in no military gear/uniform driving a humvee (that they would probably notice they lost)
suburban
Posts: 25
Joined: 2007-02-22 07:59

Post by suburban »

MADTKBOY wrote:not to mention the ability to drive a humvee, which isnt any more complicated to drive away and use than any other car with a steering wheel, shifter, and three pedals once you kill all its occupants...

After all, they are supposed to bring asymetrical warfare into the game, Think they'd care about friendly id issues so long as they can get their hands on superior equipment?
Actually the HMMWV is an automatic. Just saying that it is actually easier to drive than a HiLux technical.

I do think that at least the insurgents should get to use abandonded 4x4s. I'm sure they would use it ala car bomb to destroy a roadblock or something to that effect.
Image
"Too wierd to live. Too rare to die."
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”