
PR's new factions
-
lonelyjew
- Posts: 3176
- Joined: 2005-12-19 03:39
-
Desertfox
- Posts: 5886
- Joined: 2006-08-15 06:41
Its not like canada is the third biggest force in afghanistan. In the words of stewdadArmy Musician wrote:This gets mentioned alot in other topics, myself included.
so lets do a vote, that way the dev team can give us what we want.
We have the BRITISH, and the Americans, the MEC is unrealistic and China is a not totally unrealistic, however I dont think they would go to war with the west for the reason, they would have too much to lose.
"what has France, not to mention Ukraine, contributed lately to the defense of Afghanistan? Hmmm?"

-
Bob_Marley
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 7745
- Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39
-
Army Musician
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: 2006-03-10 23:10
-
LiquidSnake
- Posts: 743
- Joined: 2006-12-17 01:41
-
$kelet0r
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 2006-11-15 20:04
Israel or germany are obvious choices seeing as they have unique weaponry.
Russia would just be the current or slightly lower tech MEC with different skins.
Canada is similarly a bit pointless (US-alike weapons and vehicles) but anything to appease the Eggman
On the other hand I am a little worried by the forum's appetite for the pointless additions and the quantity over quality approach. Less is more people!
Russia would just be the current or slightly lower tech MEC with different skins.
Canada is similarly a bit pointless (US-alike weapons and vehicles) but anything to appease the Eggman
On the other hand I am a little worried by the forum's appetite for the pointless additions and the quantity over quality approach. Less is more people!
-
LtSoucy
- Posts: 3089
- Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04
-
Guerra norte
- Posts: 1666
- Joined: 2006-07-19 17:37
Last edited by Guerra norte on 2007-04-16 15:20, edited 1 time in total.
-
Salah ad Din
- Posts: 560
- Joined: 2007-01-03 15:15
Exactly, I agree totally and wholeheartedly!Guerra wrote:I firmly believe adding more factions is a waste of time for the developers. They could be working on more important things.
...
I recommend to work with what we have. Add maps, weapons, and vehicles above all. People love variety of vehicles. I don't want to see more clone factions. So unnecessary. They all have military equivalents, the only unique faction is the insurgents.
Anyways, add more planes (two seaters!), work on the SOFLAM, the usual bugs, more maps, more weapons, more vehicles in general. That kind of stuff. Another faction isn't worth the time and resources.
Also, I want the MEC to stay in, even if there is no MEC in RL. (There will be one though, you just wait awhile and see... well maybe a bit longer than awhile).
Reason for MEC to stay is this: the US army is simply so powerful, no single nation could stand a chance in a conventional war (maybe China, Russia??) but everybody else would need a coalition to field the necessary ressources.
The problems the US have in Iraq where not with the Iraqui army, but with the aftermath of the war.
So, actually, having e.g. Iran in a prolonged campaign against USA is unrealistic, thus not allowable in PR.
-
$kelet0r
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 2006-11-15 20:04
Q F ESpaz wrote:No more fatcions work on the factions you got, and make more insurgent maps![]()
more factions are utterly pointless, we already have 5 with as many as 7+ planned! US Army vs MEC, GB vs Taliban would be more than enough for a game. But we also have US marines, a Chechen style militia and the PLA, as well as rumours of Canada.
At a push I would like to see a (german armed) Euro force against China in heavy jungle, with the British focused on Taliban insurgents in asymmetric warfare, and the US focused on an MEC desert conventional combat. Doubt it will turn out like that. You have to ask when you make a suggestion if it would actually benefit the mod. Regarding adding more factions in roles that are already being done, the answer is no.
-
DJJ-Terror
- Posts: 671
- Joined: 2006-06-14 21:51
-
[T]Terranova7
- Posts: 1073
- Joined: 2005-06-19 20:28
-
G.Drew
- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 2006-04-30 23:02
christ not this again!
look, theres plenty of factions in PR, incase u cant remember what the factions are or are going to be, here:
http://guide.realitymod.com/index.php?title=Factions
and acutally African militants arent a bad idea, its realistic for a kick off, plus a blk hwk down map would pwn
but u could say that the militia faction could be used for this case
look, theres plenty of factions in PR, incase u cant remember what the factions are or are going to be, here:
http://guide.realitymod.com/index.php?title=Factions
and acutally African militants arent a bad idea, its realistic for a kick off, plus a blk hwk down map would pwn
but u could say that the militia faction could be used for this case
Last edited by G.Drew on 2007-04-16 15:30, edited 1 time in total.


[R-COM]BloodBane611: I do like the old school rape...However, it's a bit awkward to be a white boy blasting the old school in public....
-
Epim3theus
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: 2007-01-03 13:23
-
TayloR016
- Posts: 383
- Joined: 2007-03-11 13:55
It's gotta be israel theres only the uk and us on sides at the mo so it'd be good to add them in and maybe russia in the future.Semi wrote:Italy...
I'm puzzled by some of these suggestions though.
Iran: would be pretty much identical to today MEC
N. Korea: would almost be identical to China
Israel: would be almost identical to the US, apart from some unique armor
France: Ok
Germany: Ok
Lebanon: What's the story with this one? The lebanese army have not seen action for a decade.
Russia: Ok
how are they indentical some different weapons, tanks .. language lol they only use some us stuff and that makes them an easier army to add in then










