molotov cocktail
-
Flanker15
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 2007-02-23 09:37
The Molotov's should only be effective against vehicles, RPs and those new building things that are being added. You would only cause limited damage to a soldier with one since they only create a small fire and they wear fire resistant clothes (I think) then they just move away from the flames. The worst you'd get is a bit of burning fuel splashed on your legs, they're designed for use against flammable targets, things that don't move and vehicle engines/ammo.
-
Outlawz7
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 17261
- Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59
well, ok, if someone throws it in your face and if you keep standing there to turn into a barbecue, then it should kill you...Flanker15 wrote:The Molotov's should only be effective against vehicles, RPs and those new building things that are being added. You would only cause limited damage to a soldier with one since they only create a small fire and they wear fire resistant clothes (I think) then they just move away from the flames. The worst you'd get is a bit of burning fuel splashed on your legs, they're designed for use against flammable targets, things that don't move and vehicle engines/ammo.

-
Expendable Grunt
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 2007-03-09 01:54
Used molotovs on a landing BH in AB today...killed the pilot and I think a gunner. Killed most of the rest with my MG before being killed (I had PKM).

Former [DM] captain.
The fact that people are poor or discriminated against doesn't necessarily endow them with any special qualities of justice, nobility, charity or compassion. - Saul Alinsky
-
russ555
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 2007-02-27 23:28
how do u work that out?Flanker15 wrote:The Molotov's should only be effective against vehicles, RPs and those new building things that are being added. You would only cause limited damage to a soldier with one since they only create a small fire and they wear fire resistant clothes (I think) then they just move away from the flames. The worst you'd get is a bit of burning fuel splashed on your legs, they're designed for use against flammable targets, things that don't move and vehicle engines/ammo.
you put em on and let me throw a molotov at you see how "small" the flame is then and believe me you would have more than "a bit of burning fuel splashed on your legs"
xfire= russ555
-
loyalguard
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 2006-07-02 20:18
Here is a video from youtube showing the use of molotovs against police in Greece earlier this year that may give some indications of the physics and thermo dynamics involved. WARNING: This is graphic video and the music is NSFW:
Athens 17/01/07. Molotov Cocktails against cops
Of course there are a lot of factors (size, fuel type, stickyness), but if you keep moving and pat them out by hand or rolling around you can often extinguish them quickly. The same goes for vehicles. If a molotov hits your vehicle, the best thing you can do is keep moving. The airflow should normally extinguish the flames pretty quickly. If the target is stationary however...
Athens 17/01/07. Molotov Cocktails against cops
Of course there are a lot of factors (size, fuel type, stickyness), but if you keep moving and pat them out by hand or rolling around you can often extinguish them quickly. The same goes for vehicles. If a molotov hits your vehicle, the best thing you can do is keep moving. The airflow should normally extinguish the flames pretty quickly. If the target is stationary however...
Last edited by loyalguard on 2007-04-26 14:29, edited 1 time in total.
-
Semi
- Posts: 103
- Joined: 2007-03-31 15:07
Why would you need a flammable target? Last time I checked, gasoline burned pretty good on its own. Isn't that the point with these things?Flanker15 wrote:The Molotov's should only be effective against vehicles, RPs and those new building things that are being added. You would only cause limited damage to a soldier with one since they only create a small fire and they wear fire resistant clothes (I think) then they just move away from the flames. The worst you'd get is a bit of burning fuel splashed on your legs, they're designed for use against flammable targets, things that don't move and vehicle engines/ammo.
Speaking of molotovs. Got a pretty good hit from a rooftop and into a full, moving HMMW. Didn't kill anyone but it sure got them running.
-
Flanker15
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 2007-02-23 09:37
But the small amount of gasoline burns off quickly, if thrown onto something flammable, like dry grass you'd get a more persistent fire.
The problem with them is you need to hit something hard enough to break the bottle. Throwing one at a person, it would just bounce off and maybe not even break on the rebound.
During WW2 the Germans put wire and bushes on their tanks to stop the bottles from breaking, in response the Soviets tied a rock on a rope to bottle which smashed it on impact!
In the video it showed the only way to effect people with them is to break them on objects above and in front of someone. Even then with their protective clothing they seemed to not do much. Oh and at 32 sec in the vid it looks like an officer hits a Molotov mid-air with a gas grenade!
The problem with them is you need to hit something hard enough to break the bottle. Throwing one at a person, it would just bounce off and maybe not even break on the rebound.
During WW2 the Germans put wire and bushes on their tanks to stop the bottles from breaking, in response the Soviets tied a rock on a rope to bottle which smashed it on impact!
In the video it showed the only way to effect people with them is to break them on objects above and in front of someone. Even then with their protective clothing they seemed to not do much. Oh and at 32 sec in the vid it looks like an officer hits a Molotov mid-air with a gas grenade!
-
Semi
- Posts: 103
- Joined: 2007-03-31 15:07
I believe that were the Finns vs. the SovietsFlanker15 wrote: During WW2 the Germans put wire and bushes on their tanks to stop the bottles from breaking, in response the Soviets tied a rock on a rope to bottle which smashed it on impact!
There seems to be endless variables to this. Molotov cocktails aren't produced on a conveyor belt, and so they have different composition, different glass thickness, and wouldn't you think the power of the throw would have an impact on whether it would break or not? This is just a useless discussion, you can't judge all these things out of a 1 min video.Flanker15 wrote:In the video it showed the only way to effect people with them is to break them on objects above and in front of someone.
Do you also draw that conclusion by looking at the video, or do you have an article or something? There's no aftermath footage so I'll take your word for it.Flanker15 wrote:Even then with their protective clothing they seemed to not do much.
-
Dyer |3-5|
- Posts: 234
- Joined: 2007-03-08 17:41
-
El_Vikingo
- Posts: 4877
- Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50
-
bunny
- Posts: 134
- Joined: 2006-12-21 19:19
-
Raic
- Posts: 776
- Joined: 2007-02-24 15:59
Do you know how bad human actually have to burn to die? or to bleed from fire? I doubt you get burned that bad even if you run through the flame, ofc if the bottle brokes above the dude and he gets the coctail over himselfs and then on fire, well, hes screwed.{GD}Snake13 wrote:I think they need to be more powerful, I'm hit soldiers dead on with them just to see them run out of the flame and start shooting.
gasoline and tar mixed is the most common and orginal "molotov coctail", bottle with petrol or gasoline is just petrol bomb.Flanker15 wrote:But the small amount of gasoline burns off quickly, if thrown onto something flammable, like dry grass you'd get a more persistent fire.
Last edited by Raic on 2007-04-27 14:29, edited 1 time in total.


