HOOAH!! and ALLAH ACKBARR!!

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Long Bow
Posts: 1100
Joined: 2007-03-21 14:41

Post by Long Bow »

ArmedDrunk&Angry wrote:Wake up boys and girls, the powers that be have decided to kowtow to certain pressures and that is a trickle down process.
PR can't get sued ( in the US anyway )for what we say in the forums but they are liable for what they put in the game and the perpetually outraged will find out and cause problems.
Nobody wants to see 4-1-07's little joke become a reality.

You make a good point about the pressures being put on the devs and their responsibilites. I agree with what your saying.

101 Bassdrive I don't know if your joking but man I hope you are. Just becuase you think this is a big inside joke between the west and the muslims doesn't make it so. This is a very serious issue, do you remeber the huge uproar over a comic depicting Mohamid in a negative way!!! It was a world wide media frenzy with allot of people outraged, even some violence linked to it. We can't tell people to just relaxe because were joking around, people have the right to feel how they feel.

Now I will re-state what I said originally we could add taunts etc. if they are not race, religion or creed related. I do like the idea of making it a local sound not a radio spam. I would quickly tier of the constant spam, but it would be nice to celebrate a good assualt or take down.
Dyer |3-5|
Posts: 234
Joined: 2007-03-08 17:41

Post by Dyer |3-5| »

101 bassdrive wrote:sigh cmon people, especially you americans.
why you gotta turn this into a moral debate about religion?
allah akbahr is just a saying like oh my god.
we depict mohammed, they show caricatures denying the holocoust.
it's like a fun race bout who can humiliate the other fraction the most.
it's all fine cause they dont take it serious and neither do we.
like when they captured those brits few weeks ago: humiliate the west a bit and then release them with a broad grin of victory.
its about doing it with a certain sense of tactfulness. someone who goes on like all ***** are **** is most probably not able of self-irony and well, its just neither funny nor friendly in any way.
Id even think the muslims would be flattered and amused if theyd see we rather want to be an insurgent destroying the überpowered intemperate us/ gb forces with an allah akbahr yell than playing as our own armys.
its a kinda selfdestructive behaviour so I dont think theyd see a reason to start flame on us when we already do that ourselfs :D
specially when insurgents win most the time.
So my algebra class will be important later on. Now i see it...

You may call this a "game", but here in the real world there are people dying every day because they voluntered to join one "team" or the other. There are fathers, husbands, wives, brothers, sons, and daughters who are fighting and dying in order to protect the things that they belive in.
101 bassdrive
Posts: 514
Joined: 2007-02-20 15:04

Post by 101 bassdrive »

Long Bow wrote: 101 Bassdrive I don't know if your joking but man I hope you are. Just becuase you think this is a big inside joke between the west and the muslims doesn't make it so. This is a very serious issue, do you remeber the huge uproar over a comic depicting Mohamid in a negative way!!! It was a world wide media frenzy with allot of people outraged, even some violence linked to it. We can't tell people to just relaxe because were joking around, people have the right to feel how they feel.
first off, I wanted to help avoid the thread from gettin political but I made it worse. dammit.
I dont see it as if its a inside joke, its more likely a showdown of selfacclaimed superpowers and the first to lose his smile, well, has lost.
I sure found it hilarious that the iran put up a competition to depict holocoust denyal. so purely ridicilously genious.

bout this whole allah ackbar thingy.. now please listen: dont be so godallahjehovabuddahvishnudamn fu**en uptight bout it!
I mean the DEVs are going to implent CIVILIANS in the game. MIDDLE EASTERN CIVILIANS!
and many people start joking like: "ahah, they could leave a scratch on my humvee" and stuff.
fine for me. but as soon as its about religion you freak out. it's a bit hypocritical.

so now you can weigh those two things against eachother whats gonna upset a narrow minded/ iliterate/ religious person more, if theyd find out:
- having the possibility/ urgency to kill innocent middle eastern civilians or
- to be able to mimic the allah akbahr scream when a insurgent has defeated western power

and than while replying another american comes along.
dyer: you think you can expose my argument cause my english isnt perfect?
go ahead: reply in either frensh, german, swedish or swiss-german dialect.

well guess we need to invent nations which are in conflict then and they get to scream "hail spaghettimonster" freakin rednecks.
Long Bow
Posts: 1100
Joined: 2007-03-21 14:41

Post by Long Bow »

101 bassdrive wrote: so now you can weigh those two things against eachother whats gonna upset a narrow minded/ iliterate/ religious person more, if theyd find out:
- having the possibility/ urgency to kill innocent middle eastern civilians or
- to be able to mimic the allah akbahr scream when a insurgent has defeated western power


well guess we need to invent nations which are in conflict then and they get to scream "hail spaghettimonster" freakin rednecks.
I appreciate what your saying and I to didn't want to turn this into a religous debate. The only reason it was turned into a debate is the fact that there is very little chance of taunts being put in game if there is relegion involved. The civilians in game are middle eastern yes but there is still no relegion involved in the game (assumed relegion yes but not explicitaly stated). The killing of civilians in game is not encouraged and killing them incurs a penalty. I know that it seems silly to accept that killing in game is ok where a statement is not. But the current political climate is such that the killing in game is ok, offending a religion is not. I don't decide these things. What does or does not offend me in game is not really important. What would offend me is if a group of people were offended and put a stop to PR. As such that is why I don't support inputing something that has the potential to create such a problem, regardless of the majority of opinions.

Wow I used the word opinion and offended allot :wink: Thank you 101 Bassdrive for clarifying your opinion. I'm glad your not as un-informed as your first post lead me to believe. The redneck comment at the end though, was this directed at the posters here or your fictitional nation?
El_Vikingo
Posts: 4877
Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50

Post by El_Vikingo »

Long Bow wrote:
101 Bassdrive This is a very serious issue, do you remeber the huge uproar over a comic depicting Mohamid in a negative way!!! It was a world wide media frenzy with allot of people outraged, even some violence linked to it.
Were you even born at the time!?!

They were outraged because they'd drawn him, not because they drew him in a negative way.

You said "some" violence?
They burnt down embassies!
Image

If you are reading this dont stop, cause if you do, I'll kick you in the balls.
101 bassdrive
Posts: 514
Joined: 2007-02-20 15:04

Post by 101 bassdrive »

haha yeah isnt it absurd whats alright and whats not?
you wanna upset middle eastern people mock their religion
you wanna upset europeans tell em bout their nazi/imperialistic/crusade history
you wanna upset americans show them some titteys
xD

the suggestion were talking about is about offending people. the other team as such or a particular player.
If you want to see this mod as a e-sport thing ( C5 tourney for example) it wouldnt fit cause its not sportsman like.
if you want to see this mod as a game getting so close to reality as possible, well I guess it should be in then. fighting forces offend eachother with awful words like sandnigger, infidel and such.
the muslims yell the particular phrase "allah akbahr" when theyre winning. simple fact.
in the end it still would be a game though and I can see your point there long bow, and its convincing... it would be plain unessecary to alarm people for this rather unimportant aspect.

redneck was directed towards all people who lack self-irony, see only black and white and are being offended by everthing.
which would neither be a cynical comment towards a poster nor a citizen of a fictional nation but some pompous group or person who wants to mess with this mod.
::Major_Baker::
Posts: 406
Joined: 2006-11-22 01:06

Post by ::Major_Baker:: »

ugh, this is getting sickening.
I hate all the usage and suggestions of stuff like dirka dirka, which is mocking arabic, and the jokes made about killing civilians on purpose. Thanks god you'll aren't real soldiers. The immaturity esposing from some of these threads is pretty evident.

No mocking, no out loud comments. much easier that way.
Bassdrive, we get your point. no need to type racist BS on this forum.
101 bassdrive
Posts: 514
Joined: 2007-02-20 15:04

Post by 101 bassdrive »

blabla evident immaturity
you dont even see the direct link in which I use those words?
I don't endorse them.
now gimme a break
arthuro12
Posts: 396
Joined: 2007-02-09 16:41

Post by arthuro12 »

make it a commorose option.. like instead of GO GO GO ''HOAA! '' or '' ALLAH HU AkBAR!''
ImageImage
Possibly the sexiest member alive.. I want to tickle your prostate :D
::Major_Baker::
Posts: 406
Joined: 2006-11-22 01:06

Post by ::Major_Baker:: »

101 bassdrive wrote:blabla evident immaturity
you dont even see the direct link in which I use those words?
I don't endorse them.
now gimme a break
I saw the context, but no need to type everything out.
101 bassdrive
Posts: 514
Joined: 2007-02-20 15:04

Post by 101 bassdrive »

uhm, redneck :D
::Major_Baker::
Posts: 406
Joined: 2006-11-22 01:06

Post by ::Major_Baker:: »

101 bassdrive wrote:uhm, redneck :D
you need a 'word meaning' refresher course. Just show some respect...no need to type a word like this to make a point. Forum members may find it very offensive.
ArmedDrunk&Angry
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2006-07-14 07:10

Post by ArmedDrunk&Angry »

I would like JO style taunts.... " don't get me killed" or " you big fat pink pig" ( w/ the French accent).
If you wanted to get complicated you could make them regional generic epithets concerning the lack of ability to fight, a lack of familiarity with your chosen weapon, ....etc etc.....skill based insults, plenty offensive but in a bland PC sort of way.
We have members from most cultures represented in the game so we could have a contest to include the nastiest but cleanest PC insults.
It would be a great PC insult contest, winner gets his or her insult included in the game.
BTW,, has anyone ever translated the taunts in RO to see if they are saying what the text reads ?
And as the windshield melts
My tears evaporate
Leaving only charcoal to defend.
Finally I understand the feelings of the few.
Doom721
Posts: 503
Joined: 2006-07-30 13:32

Post by Doom721 »

causticbeat wrote:Its PR, its a fairly light hearted game. How many times playing insurgnet do you shoot down that blackhawk and then go hop up and down on its corpse firing your AK in to the air?
Every time.....

My two cents:

Its a game... Im all for chants, I like to almost "roleplay" the faction im on, insurgents IED and blasting the AK after blowing up a tank is one I do all the time.

.... Im american.... :roll: chants wouldn't offend me at all, because its a GAME.

I think the video El Vikingo linked was a good example of how chanting actually happens...

It's not like anyone wanting chants is on here with an RPG-7 lying in thier living room dying to kill some western people...

It is a game.... I don't see why you would argue ( Begin flaming now... )
Image
"FAIL" - Right after you drive on the grass in Gran Turismo 4
Playing PR since Halo dropping spec ops and SL spawn ;) ( .3 :razz: )
Proud Member of the ~6 player PR clan StrkTm
El_Vikingo
Posts: 4877
Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50

Post by El_Vikingo »

*slap my forehead*

This thread was wrong from the start, just like the other 100 threads on Allah/hooah.
Image

If you are reading this dont stop, cause if you do, I'll kick you in the balls.
Dyer |3-5|
Posts: 234
Joined: 2007-03-08 17:41

Post by Dyer |3-5| »

Doom721 wrote:Every time.....

My two cents:

Its a game... Im all for chants, I like to almost "roleplay" the faction im on, insurgents IED and blasting the AK after blowing up a tank is one I do all the time.

.... Im american.... :roll: chants wouldn't offend me at all, because its a GAME.

I think the video El Vikingo linked was a good example of how chanting actually happens...

It's not like anyone wanting chants is on here with an RPG-7 lying in thier living room dying to kill some western people...

It is a game.... I don't see why you would argue ( Begin flaming now... )
I would have to agree with you. Except for the part about not having an RPG on my bed...
[T]waylay00
Posts: 402
Joined: 2007-04-12 23:08

Post by [T]waylay00 »

Obviously 75% of you guys never played BF:Vietnam or any of the various mods for BF1942, which had taunts. Not a single time did I see a problem occur because of these taunts. It merely added atmosphere to the game, no more, no less.

Note: These taunts were localized so that they wouldn't consistently be blaring over the radio. It's just like in BF2 when you are standing next to a soldier who happens to say something using the CommoRose: you hear it locally rather than over the radio.

There's no reason this feature couldn't be implemented. (However, I do believe that putting in a religious taunt is a bad idea)
El_Vikingo
Posts: 4877
Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50

Post by El_Vikingo »

The children born in 1995 weren't old enough to play those games....

The children however, are now able to play BF2.
Image

If you are reading this dont stop, cause if you do, I'll kick you in the balls.
charliegrs
Posts: 2027
Joined: 2007-01-17 02:19

Post by charliegrs »

wow im starting to regret starting this thread.....

can you all please lighten up. like that other guy said, this is a GAME. based on REALITY. reality is not pretty. there is no political correctness BS in war. i never even thought for a minute this thread would get so political. if no insurgent was yelling allah ackbar, and i was suggesting adding it to the game then i could totally understand the outrage over the suggestion but in REALITY thats what insurgents do.

so can anys dev put some kind of conclusion to this? like tell us whether this is just completely out of the question or if your possibly interested so that this thread does not get any uglier.

anyway, sorry folks. it was just a suggestion.
known in-game as BOOMSNAPP
'
blud
Posts: 1246
Joined: 2006-09-04 22:22

Post by blud »

101 bassdrive wrote:allah akbahr is just a saying like oh my god.
That's why I don't think it should be in the mod. Saying "Oh my god" is taking the Lord's name in vain, which is against the 3rd commandment - so it's offensive to Christians. So, putting "allah akbar" in the mod is the same thing, it should offend Christians as well as Muslims.

Some people will say who cares if it offends people, and I guess if you have no morals then it would be hard to explain why it matters, but then you could at least understand reasons like these:

- Why stir up a bunch of shit for no good reason? The game is fine without allah akbar in it, so it's not worth starting so much shit over it

- Why alienate segments of the population from the game, it would hurt the popularity of the game

- What about tolerance of other religions? When you have no respect for someone's religion, then where is the tolerance?
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”