I forsee a problem with .6

Army Musician · Post by **Army Musician** » 2007-05-08 21:39

LMFAO!!!!

geek81 · Post by **geek81** » 2007-05-08 21:43

eddie wrote:You said to ask the Yanks what we should do first geek81?

Well, if we take that as learning from experience, all our Harriers should be going around dropping munitions on your friendlies

well, by your reasoning, we'll shoot you down before you get a chance.

DirtyHarry88 · Post by **DirtyHarry88** » 2007-05-08 21:44

geek81 wrote:well, by your reasoning, we'll shoot you down before you get a chance.

With your past record, probably.

Ouch.

eddie · Post by **eddie** » 2007-05-08 21:45

That is called a win^. No, not Vietnam

geek81 · Post by **geek81** » 2007-05-08 21:50

DirtyHarry88 wrote:With your past record, probably.

Ouch.

sure. guess thats why you stand behind us.

DirtyHarry88 · Post by **DirtyHarry88** » 2007-05-08 21:51

Oh yeah of course.

Blackhawk 5 · Post by **Blackhawk 5** » 2007-05-08 21:52

Depends on what hand you use to scratch your *** with...Americans use their right hands

Cerberus · Post by **Cerberus** » 2007-05-08 21:59

daranz wrote: If they're civilians, they're just gonna stand there and wait for you to kill them so that you lose points.

Just like real life!

superdj · Post by **superdj** » 2007-05-08 22:54

This is exactly why I don't come here......

Corrient · Post by **Corrient** » 2007-05-08 23:13

Have somebody handy with a scoped weapon or benoc's.

Clypp · Post by **Clypp** » 2007-05-08 23:23

Civilians sounds like a real bad idea but the Devs are smart and will probably implement them in a good way. It just sounds like these "civilians" will be running into danger zones and jumping around like idiots in order to get shot or killed.

El_Vikingo · Post by **El_Vikingo** » 2007-05-08 23:28

the DEVs said that objects will render at a larger distance now, including guns.
Re-read the "overhaul of aircraft in 0.6" thread. It tells you there.

No, I'm can't be bothered to look for it for you, so go look for it yourself.

eddie · Post by **eddie** » 2007-05-08 23:48

It also says on the second page of this thread. As Hfett kindly pointed out.

Post by **Mongolian_dude** » 2007-05-08 23:55

If you've played long enough, you will be able to recognise a guys stance through binocs/scope of a sniper rifle and relate it to the type of weapon.
If a guy has his hands around and above his chest, hes AT for instance.
Learn to addapt guys

...mongol...

SGT.Collado · Post by **SGT.Collado** » 2007-05-09 00:05

77SiCaRiO77 wrote:ask him if he is an enemy , if he answer you in other language, then fire at him

LOLLOL

U LITERALLY MADE ME CRACK UP!

that shit is classic...you're going in my sig..

Determined · Post by **Determined** » 2007-05-09 02:11

Ask simple question, get 3 pages of people taking cheap shots at the US. lollerz, omgzorz we too funny.

Anyway, civilians are a horrible idea in a public game where the level of role play will be low. There is no way that the civilian class will be used properly. The Dev's may have good intentions but they can't deprogram stupidity or smacktards.

youm0nt · Post by **youm0nt** » 2007-05-09 02:43

I can picture it now...
A squad or group of civilians are just screwing around and not actually helping the team... They go inside one of the houses and they just sit on the couches until a squad of USMC soldiers go in the house and the civilians start using the chat saying "This is our house you can't come in!" and then the civilians will block the doorway from the inside...
Oh well, we'll see what happens when it's out...

[T]waylay00 · Post by **[T]waylay00** » 2007-05-09 03:08

Determined wrote:Ask simple question, get 3 pages of people taking cheap shots at the US. lollerz, omgzorz we too funny.

To tell you the truth, it's become rather ridiculous, IMO. Most Brits on this board are very pretentious. (MOST, not all...)

swiftdraw · Post by **swiftdraw** » 2007-05-09 03:09

Heck, I know what I'll be doing as a Insurgent, tucking real close to a civilian and use them as a shield for incoming fire. Chances are people firing at me will hit him first and lose points, while I just fire over his shoulder or over his head. Ah, gotta love human shields.

Cowardly and immoral? Yes.
Effective? yes

Determined · Post by **Determined** » 2007-05-09 03:12

swiftdraw wrote:Heck, I know what I'll be doing as a Insurgent, tucking real close to a civilian and use them as a shield for incoming fire. Chances are people firing at me will hit him first and lose points, while I just fire over his shoulder or over his head. Ah, gotta love human shields.

Cowardly and immoral? Yes.
Effective? yes

I got one better. Have several civilians line up and make a wall. Now that is a shield. lol