bridges

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-07-20 16:29

maybe it would be cool and a big strategical advantage to, have bridges that you can lower or pull up.. like the SF stuff had the elevators

:

,, you and youre squad spotted an huge convoi of armor ahead of the bridge, and you say trough VOIP, theres an huges armor division moving up the bridge! than the squad (defending the bridge point) closes the bridge and you can settup an ambush near the bridge ,,

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-07-20 16:30

or fortyfie the bridge, for example with AA

El_Vikingo · Post by **El_Vikingo** » 2007-07-20 16:41

You mean a Bridge over moat thing?

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-07-20 16:50

srry my english is not verry good. what mean moat

NiGHTWoLF · Post by **NiGHTWoLF** » 2007-07-20 16:54

arjan wrote:what mean moat

A defensive feature usually a large empty ditch or a ditch filled with water. Most commonly used in medieval times to defend castles.

Its also an abreviation for `Mother of all turds`

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-07-20 16:57

no not that
an bridge in woods or something over an lake like this sort of bridge
http://www.rapid-fire.uk.com/images/sce ... egasus.jpg

NiGHTWoLF · Post by **NiGHTWoLF** » 2007-07-20 16:58

Ohh right i get you, but i prefer swing bridges myself like this one

damn thats beautiful

ReaperMAC · Post by **ReaperMAC** » 2007-07-20 16:58

Heh, its CoD all over again...

El_Vikingo · Post by **El_Vikingo** » 2007-07-20 16:59

I see, well that would be up to othe mappers and coders and modellers to model it, code it and use it in a map.

Why not? It would add a fun element to the map.

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-07-20 17:00

Omg xD

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-07-20 17:01

the bridge of Nighwolf

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-07-20 17:03

that bridge suck nightwolf,, but i think my Bridge should be great advantage for the 2 sides fighting for it ,, like the brittain must take control of the russian faction, bridge so armor can move trough the battlezone

NiGHTWoLF · Post by **NiGHTWoLF** » 2007-07-20 17:05

yeh well, at least my bridge has had drunken geordies throwing themselves into the river thinking they can actually swim while heavily entoxicated.

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-07-20 17:07

haha youre funny

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-07-20 17:14

i hope it comes in an later version ,, and i hope an dev takes an look at this

geogob · Post by **geogob** » 2007-07-20 17:15

mmm. How about rope bridges as deployable commander assets

That would come in handy on quite a few maps.

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-07-20 19:51

no my idea was to make an bridge that you can lower and take up.. like you have the stuff of bf2 SF with the elevators ,, NO commander assets please,, i think a bridge as commander asset sucks

Swe_Olsson · Post by **Swe_Olsson** » 2007-07-20 20:00

geo i doubt it would work, because usually when you deplay an asset its in the air... the vehicles would have a hard time traveling over the bridge if its in the air yea ?... lol

geogob · Post by **geogob** » 2007-07-20 20:07

Why do you think it would "suck"? I do understand it's something else you suggested and my idea was meant as an alternative to yours.

I can also see the problem of making a rope bridge deployment realistic (although i have a few idea). But I fail to see why it would plain and simply suck.

Also, a quickly deployed rope bridge is not intended for vehicles, only infantry.à

For vehicles, it would be nice to have something like the M60A1 AVLB or the Titan.

Nimble · Post by **Nimble** » 2007-07-20 20:12

This can only lead to .... TANK CATAPULTING!