'[R-DEV wrote:Evilhomer']Interesting thing is though, in most picture that Uk-Force is in he's going "it's this big" with his hands....
![]()
hahaha
who won the shooting range ?
'[R-DEV wrote:Evilhomer']Interesting thing is though, in most picture that Uk-Force is in he's going "it's this big" with his hands....
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/8667/1001756le6.jpg
![]()

'[R-DEV wrote:UK_Force']What you mean this one ............. lol
.


'[R-DEV wrote: JS.Fortnight.A']@ gazzthompson
[R-DEV]Stigger had the best marksman scores in the line ranges, however both groups of 5 (we were split into two groups) did worse on the ranges, but totally killed the scenario round where enemy troops were dropped off via Chinook and then tried to advance up a hill to our position to over-run us. The neat thing was that the instructor was able to dynamically change what was on screen. This included optics usage (NV/IR), flares, fog, enemy/friendly units and vehicles etc...The graphics quality on all of the simulators including the Small Arms Trainers was Quake 1 at best, but they calculated bullet drop and wind accordingly, so they had a touch of PR/ArmA in them.
The best setup was that of the Warrior gunnery trainer which was bought just a few months ago for several million £s. It used LCD monitors to display the views inside the vehicle. However, and I think I speak for most on the team that went on this trip, the Challenger 2 driving simulator was the funnest.
Yes they do face up, what you see on top in the picture is the shouder rest.'[R-MOD wrote:Griffon2-6']Who's [R-DEV]Sim? And yeah, I know the feeling when you actually get to see what you see in games in person. I was in an M1A1 just this Monday. GD Canada didn't allow cameras though.
I've also been next to a BMP. It was a BMP-1 at the war museum, and was not that small.
Oh, and how is that LAW-80 upside-down? the optics are supposed to face up, aren't they?

