make 50.cals not laser weapons!

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Gunwing
Posts: 184
Joined: 2007-02-16 18:21

make 50.cals not laser weapons!

Post by Gunwing »

I don't know about the rest of you but no vehicle mounted 50.cal works as great as they do in this game. I have been hit 12 times in the head by a tanks 50.cal MG at over 13000 yards. There is no way that can happen in real life.

You see 50.cal weapons in this mod lack something the real ones have recoil. I'm not saying they should have a bullet spread, but that they should have a bit of climb like the M16A4 dose. It would at least make tank commanders have to aim more, then the laser pin point **** the infantry have to deal with right now.

I know there is this massive resistance to making this kind of change on mounted weapons. But the infantry are at a major disadvantage right now on maps like Kashan because the tanks can hit them at any range with a 50.cal bullet.

Oh BTW no tank in the real world has a 50.cal, or a 12.7mm coax MG. They are all 7.62mm The Abrams has a 7.62mm coax in the turret, not a 50.cal, and so dose the T-90, as well as the T-55, and even the Type-99 is this way.

If we could add some type of small amount of recoil to the 50.cals in game the gameplay would be way more realistic. Your not a 50 gunner on a HMMWV because it's easy but because your rated to fire that weapon. Most real life soldiers will tell you that a 50.cal, or a 12.7mm weapon has a major amount of kick back.
gclark03
Posts: 1591
Joined: 2007-11-05 02:01

Post by gclark03 »

Every coaxial MG in the game is 7.62mm NATO or Soviet, not .50 caliber.

If you mean the tank commander turret, it's very hard to 'snipe' with iron sights. I agree that deviation still needs tweaking, but nothing as dramatic as what you're suggesting.
Gunwing
Posts: 184
Joined: 2007-02-16 18:21

Post by Gunwing »

gclark03 wrote:Every coaxial MG in the game is 7.62mm NATO or Soviet, not .50 caliber.

If you mean the tank commander turret, it's very hard to 'snipe' with iron sights. I agree that deviation still needs tweaking, but nothing as dramatic as what you're suggesting.
yes I mean the cupla commander gun, but also the fact that the 7.62 coax weapons are also just as bad if not worse because they can hit targets at twice the range of any 7.62mm weapon in military service needs to be fixed as well.
charliegrs
Posts: 2027
Joined: 2007-01-17 02:19

Post by charliegrs »

i would think that a gun thats mounted to a 70 ton monster like an abrams would be fairly stable...
known in-game as BOOMSNAPP
'
M.0.D
Posts: 138
Joined: 2006-05-07 21:54

Post by M.0.D »

yeah and with modern firing systems you should be abled to snipe at nearly every distance that the weapon's bullet is still flying
Image
This message has been made of environment-friendly recycled letters and words from deleted mails and is fully digital-degradable.
Jester_Prince
Posts: 112
Joined: 2008-03-15 01:28

Post by Jester_Prince »

Do mounted weapons have muzzle climb? or even recoil...the weapons are pretty stable.

And they certainly arnt lazer accurate and they don't have iron sights to aim with either.

Besides, if a 50. cal is shooting at you don't pop your head up, don't move until its either reloading or someone else is distracting it.

50. cals are fine leave them as they are.
Airsoft
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4713
Joined: 2007-09-20 00:53

Post by Airsoft »

dont the abrams have BOTH M240 and M2 .50 cal on the top IRL
$kelet0r
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2006-11-15 20:04

Post by $kelet0r »

To the OP
Get a T90 on one side of the Bunker complex of Kashan and try to hit infantry on the opposite hill. It's not easy, there's a good deal of deviation kicking in at that range not to mention the bullet drop which kicks in as well
Sniper accurate they are not - but they are extremely effective
Warmagi
Posts: 299
Joined: 2007-09-17 12:14

Post by Warmagi »

Mounted weapons do have recoil, big kick back??????? REALLY???? Where did heard that?

Just stop bunny hopping, go prone, throw smoke and flank or completly go away, you are infantry, not a tank buster. PR - figure out yourself what the letters mean.
[R-MOD]Mongolian_dude: ...remember to show as much respect to the new players as the veteran players. Todays 'noob' is tomorrow's 'Vet'.

Reddish_Red: We're fine...

Random.. ehmmm... "player": Give me the chopper. No. I want to fly. No. But I want to, get out from it now or I TK you. ... ... ... No
azn_chopsticks_boi
Posts: 898
Joined: 2005-08-22 13:14

Post by azn_chopsticks_boi »

Gunwing wrote:
Oh BTW no tank in the real world has a 50.cal, or a 12.7mm coax MG. They are all 7.62mm The Abrams has a 7.62mm coax in the turret, not a 50.cal, and so dose the T-90, as well as the T-55, and even the Type-99 is this way.
This has been suggested many tomes before, but it would need a new model since PR can not edit dice's models
BloodBane611
Posts: 6576
Joined: 2007-11-14 23:31

Post by BloodBane611 »

Weapon mounts are generally designed to reduce the recoil of the weapon they mount. A tanks coaxial machine gun, coupled with the tank's targeting system, is able to engage a man size target at a very, very long range, somewhere near the maximum range of the weapon.

I've never fired a mounted .50 cal, but I don't think the current recoil is a real problem.
[R-CON]creepin - "because on the internet 0=1"
terenz
Posts: 120
Joined: 2008-02-19 14:04

Post by terenz »

Well, IRL its elligal to shoot directly at personal with 50cal guns, so already there, its kinda unrealistic. Might be too much to make a ticket loss on direct 50cal personal kills :)
gclark03
Posts: 1591
Joined: 2007-11-05 02:01

Post by gclark03 »

Illegal? When you have armed forces larger than the next seven in the world combined, the largest effective arsenal of nuclear ICBMs on the planet, and an intelligence arm capable of overthrowing just about any country with the right funding, you'll find that there are very few with the gall to stand up to your breaking the law.

In summary, .50 cal weapons are fine; the point of war is to kill the enemy, so why not kill him well?
$kelet0r
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2006-11-15 20:04

Post by $kelet0r »

terenz wrote:Well, IRL its elligal to shoot directly at personal with 50cal guns, so already there, its kinda unrealistic. Might be too much to make a ticket loss on direct 50cal personal kills :)
This is a myth
Sabre_tooth_tigger
Posts: 1922
Joined: 2007-06-01 20:14

Post by Sabre_tooth_tigger »

50 cal is not half as effective as that scoped co axial. It does have bullet drop but not enough to make you miss that much
Hfett
Posts: 1672
Joined: 2006-06-10 20:50

Post by Hfett »

Sabre_tooth_tigger wrote:50 cal is not half as effective as that scoped co axial. It does have bullet drop but not enough to make you miss that much
and what about a scoped .50?
www.joinsquadbrasil.com.br
Sabre_tooth_tigger
Posts: 1922
Joined: 2007-06-01 20:14

Post by Sabre_tooth_tigger »

Apart from a sniper rifle we dont have any scoped 50 cals, that really would be deadly :D

The gun on the militia apc might be closest to that and I cant remember if its scoped in this version, probably not as its pretty dam ****

Theres no bullet drop on 50 cals afaik but you cant see that far while shooting with them anyway so its not a big deal whether they relate to real weaponry on a tank or not
LeadMagnet
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1372
Joined: 2007-02-09 20:11

Post by LeadMagnet »

Speaking from experience in the game; it takes quite a few rounds to manage a kill with the coax at distance. It's more like spraying a garden hose into the air and walking the stream onto target.

Speaking from experience in the world; mounted weapons recoil is both absorbed by the mount and far more controllable. Initially there is some jump but that is easily correctable and normally doesn't take that long to get rounds on target.

“Without Warning, Sans Remorse”
Sabre_tooth_tigger
Posts: 1922
Joined: 2007-06-01 20:14

Post by Sabre_tooth_tigger »

^^ Agreed


This video is pretty awesome, scope fitted .50 cal on a firing range with tracer rounds used to sight the target.

YouTube - .50 Cal M2 Browning 12.7mm
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

LeadMagnet wrote:Speaking from experience in the game; it takes quite a few rounds to manage a kill with the coax at distance. It's more like spraying a garden hose into the air and walking the stream onto target.

Speaking from experience in the world; mounted weapons recoil is both absorbed by the mount and far more controllable. Initially there is some jump but that is easily correctable and normally doesn't take that long to get rounds on target.
Coax+800m+180 ping=one happy ******* that lives (until I load HEAT)
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”