Legit or exploit?
-
BadKarma
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 2005-07-13 10:10
Legit or exploit?
For the first time since i play PR (and i played the very first beta) this weekend i saw the US using their LBs as "bombers" with Engineers or Spec-Ops dropping C4 on bunkers and firebases.
Do you guys consider it a legit use of assets or a lame a** exploit?
Do you guys consider it a legit use of assets or a lame a** exploit?
-
ZaZZo
- Posts: 1494
- Joined: 2007-02-03 18:37
Re: Legit or exploit?
Legit, because it isn't a bug or glitch with the game.
Rather unrealistiv I'd say though, but probably a damn good laugh
Rather unrealistiv I'd say though, but probably a damn good laugh
-
-=shootmeplz=-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 2006-12-28 20:44
Re: Legit or exploit?
no exploit and nothing new.
i remember people sitting in the merlin, AL Basrah map on pr 0.6, when choppers were able to resupply. They were blowing all the bridges up constantly, making it impossible for the insurgents to win.
unrealistic, but at least it requires good teamwork and piloting.
i remember people sitting in the merlin, AL Basrah map on pr 0.6, when choppers were able to resupply. They were blowing all the bridges up constantly, making it impossible for the insurgents to win.
unrealistic, but at least it requires good teamwork and piloting.
-
Spaz
- Posts: 3957
- Joined: 2006-06-01 15:57
-
MadTommy
- Posts: 2220
- Joined: 2006-05-23 11:34
Re: Legit or exploit?
Surely if you've played since the beginning you remember early scenario mode, the LB's were routinely used as bombers, and you still see them used as HAT platforms! (and even Kamikaze bombers - eh fuzzBadKarma wrote:For the first time since i play PR (and i played the very first beta) this weekend i saw the US using their LBs as "bombers" with Engineers or Spec-Ops dropping C4 on bunkers and firebases.
Do you guys consider it a legit use of assets or a lame a** exploit?
Its a legit tactic... mainly because its so easy to counter.. LBs are so weak, anything will take em down. And it takes some skill to achieve it, so i say fair play. Just jump in a .50cal and make mince meat of them.
-
Fabryz
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 2007-05-04 18:30
Re: Legit or exploit?
Didn't you ever see LBs with AT soldiers in Qwai River?BadKarma wrote:For the first time since i play PR (and i played the very first beta) this weekend i saw the US using their LBs as "bombers" with Engineers or Spec-Ops dropping C4 on bunkers and firebases.
Do you guys consider it a legit use of assets or a lame a** exploit?
-
General Dragosh
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: 2005-12-04 17:35
Re: Legit or exploit?
Lol yeah, hat that thing 2 days ago, those guy serriously need to learn how to aim properlyFabryz wrote:Didn't you ever see LBs with AT soldiers in Qwai River?![]()
[img][/img]Newly ordered sig !
-
MrD
- Posts: 3399
- Joined: 2006-05-13 16:21
Re: Legit or exploit?
Well, the simple answer to this is that the players haven't realised that LB's are viable manpads targets now and a team always needs at least one manpads on the go when fighting a map with LB's on it!
When a pilot and 'bombers' are getting blown out of the sky they'll soon grow bored of it! Up until that decision is made to change gaming practises they will get it easy.
When a pilot and 'bombers' are getting blown out of the sky they'll soon grow bored of it! Up until that decision is made to change gaming practises they will get it easy.

[R-MOD]Mongolian Dude: AH man, sarcasm is so hard to get across the web, even if we are both british
[R-DEV]Jaymz: That has to be...the most epic response to a welcome thread I have ever seen. [R-CON]Mr.D ladies and gentlemen!
-
Jaitara_X
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 2007-07-15 14:15
It's perfectly legit, though it bears noting that, again, no real accuracy can be achieved unless they stand still. And that's just inviting small arms fire
believe me, nothing's more satisfying than a whole squad blowing up an enemy helicopter after expending no more than a clip of rifle ammo each.
-
bosco_
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 14620
- Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04
-
nedlands1
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: 2006-05-28 09:50
Re: Legit or exploit?
I remember (back in the day) being flown over Muttrah City with my M203 at hand while using the infinite resupply the LB had to fuel my aerial bombardment. Now that was an exploit!

-
Epim3theus
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: 2007-01-03 13:23
Re: Legit or exploit?
Everybody says its easy to counter and not really effective, but so is 1 man tanking...
Waist of assets is frowned upon last time i read about it.
Anyways i think it's kind of lame, esp. shooting HAT from a chopper and throwing C4 out of the side also. Maybe it's fun but in case of the HAT shurely an exploit.
Waist of assets is frowned upon last time i read about it.
Anyways i think it's kind of lame, esp. shooting HAT from a chopper and throwing C4 out of the side also. Maybe it's fun but in case of the HAT shurely an exploit.
If you can read this the ***** fell off.
-
Petey
- Posts: 253
- Joined: 2007-08-21 22:02
-
Zimmer
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: 2008-01-12 00:21
Re: Legit or exploit?
well more exploit is one AA rifleman one Anti tank one automatic rifleman + a medic to restore health if not badly wounded.
People don't realize that autism doesn't mean they're "stupid". Just socially inept. Like rhino... > > or in a worst case scenario... Wicca. =)- Lithium fox


I found this sentence quite funny and since this is a war game forum I will put it here. No offense to the french just a good laugh.
"Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without an accordion. All you do is leave behind a lot of noisy baggage."
-
Viper5
- Posts: 3240
- Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18
Re: Legit or exploit?
Its lame as hell, but I wouldnt classify as exploit. Just grab a MANPADS and spank em.
-
Rudd
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 21225
- Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32
Re: Legit or exploit?
Like this? (skip to 50seconds)Zimmer wrote:well more exploit is one AA rifleman one Anti tank one automatic rifleman + a medic to restore health if not badly wounded.
Since this tactic requires a fantastic pilot as not for a LMG to kill everyone- its a fine tactic. EDIT- i'm refering to the C4 tactic, not the below vid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0GCA6v44yc[/youtube]
Last edited by Rudd on 2008-05-19 15:43, edited 1 time in total.
-
General_J0k3r
- Posts: 2051
- Joined: 2007-03-02 16:01
Re: Legit or exploit?
the LB's on qwai manned with 2 H-ATs make for excellent tank and bunker hunters 
-
CareBear
- Posts: 4036
- Joined: 2007-04-19 17:41
Re: Legit or exploit?
epic lullzSpaz wrote:All I can say is roflhawk on kashan 16![]()
all i can say in reply is some weed from tescos from the french that arent vampires....

-
Sabre_tooth_tigger
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: 2007-06-01 20:14
Re: Legit or exploit?

The HAT also has some backblast. I wont say its an exploit but its easier to do then it should be, the rocket kits should have a backblast that damages but they dont and that is why you are sucessfull.
Its unrealistic
The counter to this is to have a team that actually uses their AA properly which is not usually the case


Basra Two Zero: An SAS veteran views the Iraq war from the soldiers' point of view | the Daily Mail



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0EFboaed24
Last edited by Sabre_tooth_tigger on 2008-05-19 16:36, edited 3 times in total.
-
gazzthompson
- Posts: 8012
- Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05
Re: Legit or exploit?


also at the start of the game i almost always take some 1 to drop C4 on both south bridge and north bridge and blow them within first 2 mins





