Legit or exploit?

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
BadKarma
Posts: 43
Joined: 2005-07-13 10:10

Legit or exploit?

Post by BadKarma »

For the first time since i play PR (and i played the very first beta) this weekend i saw the US using their LBs as "bombers" with Engineers or Spec-Ops dropping C4 on bunkers and firebases.
Do you guys consider it a legit use of assets or a lame a** exploit?
ZaZZo
Posts: 1494
Joined: 2007-02-03 18:37

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by ZaZZo »

Legit, because it isn't a bug or glitch with the game.

Rather unrealistiv I'd say though, but probably a damn good laugh :D
-=shootmeplz=-
Posts: 46
Joined: 2006-12-28 20:44

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by -=shootmeplz=- »

no exploit and nothing new.
i remember people sitting in the merlin, AL Basrah map on pr 0.6, when choppers were able to resupply. They were blowing all the bridges up constantly, making it impossible for the insurgents to win.
unrealistic, but at least it requires good teamwork and piloting.
Spaz
Posts: 3957
Joined: 2006-06-01 15:57

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by Spaz »

All I can say is roflhawk on kashan 16 :p
Image
MadTommy
Posts: 2220
Joined: 2006-05-23 11:34

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by MadTommy »

BadKarma wrote:For the first time since i play PR (and i played the very first beta) this weekend i saw the US using their LBs as "bombers" with Engineers or Spec-Ops dropping C4 on bunkers and firebases.
Do you guys consider it a legit use of assets or a lame a** exploit?
Surely if you've played since the beginning you remember early scenario mode, the LB's were routinely used as bombers, and you still see them used as HAT platforms! (and even Kamikaze bombers - eh fuzz :D )

Its a legit tactic... mainly because its so easy to counter.. LBs are so weak, anything will take em down. And it takes some skill to achieve it, so i say fair play. Just jump in a .50cal and make mince meat of them. :)
Fabryz
Posts: 177
Joined: 2007-05-04 18:30

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by Fabryz »

BadKarma wrote:For the first time since i play PR (and i played the very first beta) this weekend i saw the US using their LBs as "bombers" with Engineers or Spec-Ops dropping C4 on bunkers and firebases.
Do you guys consider it a legit use of assets or a lame a** exploit?
Didn't you ever see LBs with AT soldiers in Qwai River? :lol:
General Dragosh
Posts: 1282
Joined: 2005-12-04 17:35

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by General Dragosh »

Fabryz wrote:Didn't you ever see LBs with AT soldiers in Qwai River? :lol:
Lol yeah, hat that thing 2 days ago, those guy serriously need to learn how to aim properly :mrgreen:
[img][/img]Newly ordered sig !


MrD
Posts: 3399
Joined: 2006-05-13 16:21

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by MrD »

Well, the simple answer to this is that the players haven't realised that LB's are viable manpads targets now and a team always needs at least one manpads on the go when fighting a map with LB's on it!

When a pilot and 'bombers' are getting blown out of the sky they'll soon grow bored of it! Up until that decision is made to change gaming practises they will get it easy.
Image
[R-MOD]Mongolian Dude:
AH man, sarcasm is so hard to get across the web, even if we are both british :(
[R-DEV]Jaymz: That has to be...the most epic response to a welcome thread I have ever seen. [R-CON]Mr.D ladies and gentlemen!
Jaitara_X
Posts: 33
Joined: 2007-07-15 14:15

Post by Jaitara_X »

It's perfectly legit, though it bears noting that, again, no real accuracy can be achieved unless they stand still. And that's just inviting small arms fire :) believe me, nothing's more satisfying than a whole squad blowing up an enemy helicopter after expending no more than a clip of rifle ammo each.
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by bosco_ »

^ What he said.
Image
nedlands1
Posts: 1467
Joined: 2006-05-28 09:50

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by nedlands1 »

I remember (back in the day) being flown over Muttrah City with my M203 at hand while using the infinite resupply the LB had to fuel my aerial bombardment. Now that was an exploit!
Image
Epim3theus
Posts: 1110
Joined: 2007-01-03 13:23

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by Epim3theus »

Everybody says its easy to counter and not really effective, but so is 1 man tanking...
Waist of assets is frowned upon last time i read about it.
Anyways i think it's kind of lame, esp. shooting HAT from a chopper and throwing C4 out of the side also. Maybe it's fun but in case of the HAT shurely an exploit.
If you can read this the ***** fell off.
Petey
Posts: 253
Joined: 2007-08-21 22:02

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by Petey »

hmm sounds like a pretty damn good idea :D
i shall try it on PRSP ;)
Image
Zimmer
Posts: 2069
Joined: 2008-01-12 00:21

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by Zimmer »

well more exploit is one AA rifleman one Anti tank one automatic rifleman + a medic to restore health if not badly wounded.
People don't realize that autism doesn't mean they're "stupid". Just socially inept. Like rhino... > > or in a worst case scenario... Wicca. =)- Lithium fox
Image

I found this sentence quite funny and since this is a war game forum I will put it here. No offense to the french just a good laugh.
"Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without an accordion. All you do is leave behind a lot of noisy baggage."
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by Viper5 »

Its lame as hell, but I wouldnt classify as exploit. Just grab a MANPADS and spank em.
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by Rudd »

Zimmer wrote:well more exploit is one AA rifleman one Anti tank one automatic rifleman + a medic to restore health if not badly wounded.
Like this? (skip to 50seconds)

Since this tactic requires a fantastic pilot as not for a LMG to kill everyone- its a fine tactic. EDIT- i'm refering to the C4 tactic, not the below vid :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0GCA6v44yc[/youtube]
Last edited by Rudd on 2008-05-19 15:43, edited 1 time in total.
Image
General_J0k3r
Posts: 2051
Joined: 2007-03-02 16:01

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by General_J0k3r »

the LB's on qwai manned with 2 H-ATs make for excellent tank and bunker hunters :D
CareBear
Posts: 4036
Joined: 2007-04-19 17:41

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by CareBear »

Spaz wrote:All I can say is roflhawk on kashan 16 :p
epic lullz


all i can say in reply is some weed from tescos from the french that arent vampires.... :shock:
Image
Sabre_tooth_tigger
Posts: 1922
Joined: 2007-06-01 20:14

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by Sabre_tooth_tigger »

Image

The HAT also has some backblast. I wont say its an exploit but its easier to do then it should be, the rocket kits should have a backblast that damages but they dont and that is why you are sucessfull.
Its unrealistic

The counter to this is to have a team that actually uses their AA properly which is not usually the case



Image


Image


Basra Two Zero: An SAS veteran views the Iraq war from the soldiers' point of view | the Daily Mail




Image

Image

Image

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0EFboaed24
Last edited by Sabre_tooth_tigger on 2008-05-19 16:36, edited 3 times in total.
gazzthompson
Posts: 8012
Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05

Re: Legit or exploit?

Post by gazzthompson »

Image

Image


also at the start of the game i almost always take some 1 to drop C4 on both south bridge and north bridge and blow them within first 2 mins
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”