destructible trees

[Conman51]

no!!! i dont play crisis but i thought this would be col for pr...u dont have to make whole forests able to be run over by tanks..but maybe a few taht could be taken out by c4 or light at..so infantry can knck one over and use it as cover in a fire fight...would be cool

[Rhino]

we already have enough problems with dest buildings reaching the max limit of networkables....

[HughJass]

its laggy, and you are only allowed to have 1024 destructable objects on a map (bf2 limitations)

And usually, you want your map to have at most 300 destructable objects in order to not make it lag.

[Colt556]

This suggestion made me think of Battlefield B-company. It'd never work right though, not in the BF2 engine. Maybe in BF3, but not here.

[Lynx]

that would be awesome! ya think there could be just a few destructible large trees in an urban setting that would fall over for infantry to hide behind

[Wh1tE_Dw4rF]

If you have a limit on destructable objects, maybe dont add destroyable trees in urban settings, as you want to have buildings to tear down. But in forest maps, there would be room for a few places to have such trees. Especially around a CP.

[AfterDune]

Adding "some" destructible trees... won't add too much to the game, I think. Unless you use those as bloccades or something. That you have to destroy the trees to get through a passage way. But otherwise, meh.

Don't get me wrong, I like the idea (although it's been suggested before), but in this engine, it's not going to happen I'm afraid.

[Lynx]

what about allowing tanks to drive through the thin trees simulating a tank's bad@$$sness

if ya do that then also allow them to drive through light poles

[Conman51]

its laggy, and you are only allowed to have 1024 destructable objects on a map (bf2 limitations)

And usually, you want your map to have at most 300 destructable objects in order to not make it lag.

right..forgot bout that