Im sorry i was incorrect. the f 14 can engage up to 6 simultaneous targets at a range of 115 milesPence wrote:
Source?
http://www.voodoo.cz/tomcat/arm.html
Im sorry i was incorrect. the f 14 can engage up to 6 simultaneous targets at a range of 115 milesPence wrote:
Source?
I dont see why thies weapons cannot be used on other aircraft.six7 wrote:Im sorry i was incorrect. the f 14 can engage up to 6 simultaneous targets at a range of 115 miles
http://www.voodoo.cz/tomcat/arm.html

Its capability is irelivent?Zepheris Casull wrote:no one can afford it,
Phoenix missile that gave the F-14 it's incredible long reach was also meant for bombers originally and not so much against fighters. That and they cost almost 10 times as much as smaller dogfight missiles.


Lets stay on topic now.Figisaacnewton wrote:I'll pop in for a slight history adjustment: The six day war was won by israel against MASSIVE amounts of opponents. like... 4 to 1 or 5 to 1. Superior tanks helped a little, superior planes helped a bit, but mostly ,the israeli strategy kicked ***, and all thier troops were trained WAAAY better than almost all of the arab troops. also, israel had some good info from spies, and the arab countries made numerous large scale strategical blunders (like each country fighting israel alone at seperate times, instead of all at once).

Well they use it, mabey Russia could not resist the oil that the MEC offer, or Russia is an allie of the MEC or as everyone keeps saying - Russia goes almost bankrupt and decides to jump on every finacial deal possable.lonelyjew wrote:That's not a realistic tank for them to have though. DICE just put it in because it's a modern MBT that isn't made by the U.S. or it's allies. I highly doubt Russia would just export this tank.

How come they are the Profetional force they are then?lonelyjew wrote: But anyways, the MEC would not just magically gain good training, modern weaponry(they'de have some, but not way too much and nothing brand new), and competant officers. They wouldn't gain this because before hand, Israel would attack them. They would fight before they ever got to their full strength.

I believe it is because this is supposed to be a WW3 scenario. The only thing bf2 does incorrectly is forget US would have allies (well, untill euro force anyways). China and MEC won't fight because they are direclty interdepenent on each other, and a lot of storylines place US intervention in MEC oil capabilites pissing off China and pushing them over the limit.'[R-DEV wrote:Happy']Why do China and MEC never fight?
I have always wondered this.

So your saying, take the MEC out?Zepheris Casull wrote:MEC is there coz DICE think it's convinient and since i am sure they think that some sort of middle eastern arab country representation is needed.
Seik (spelling) is the religion in India, India and Pakistani people dont like each other, i cant see India being part of the MEC because of this. In-fact i think India should not be spoken of.I would have to assume India may have joined the MEC.
Has this already been coverd?c. they have a combat proven strong army in the form of IDF.
