[Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Making or wanting help making your own asset? Check in here
Bob_Marley
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7745
Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by Bob_Marley »

The Iranians as MEC forces? Come-on guys don't start this discussion again. The MEC in game represent an Arab coalition while the Iranians are Persians. The MEC in-game speak Arabic and pretty much look like a stereotypical Arab, while the Iranians speak Farsi and don't quite look the same. Aside from the fact that the nation of Iran hasn't attacked anyone in thousands of years to assume it suddenly decided to start a major war with the West. Don’t make me have to go into to detail to explain why Iranians won’t fit with an Arab coalition.
Indeed.

Perhaps having MP5s or HK33s (perhaps using the HK53 as a placeholder) as the unscoped shoulder arm would be a better option than the KH2002.

The BMP-3 is rahter modern compared with the rest of the equipment, perhaps look at the older BMP models as options.

Regarding tanks, historically Middle Eastern nations have followed a doctrine similar to the Russians/Soviets. Equipment doesn't get retired, it just gets passed on to rear echelon formations. With tanks that typically ment they were passed back and used as mobile pillboxes and as general infantry support. So seeing T-62s or T-55s would not be out of place with a force like this (ie 2nd line regulars and reservists)
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Image
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
Scot
Posts: 9270
Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by Scot »

I know that the DRC mod is trying for BMP 1s.
Image
J.F.Leusch69
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2988
Joined: 2008-04-23 16:37

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by J.F.Leusch69 »

no no no and no... it is a better armed than milita and less armed than normal mecs, and i thing i is a great addon!!!
Bob_Marley
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7745
Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by Bob_Marley »

NickO wrote:HA!

On several maps MEC are already BALANCED defending areas. Such as on Jabal and Gulf of Oman. Now if you were to nerf the team so significantly as you suggest and their ONLY advantage being the map layout they will get completely OWNED. Unless you make a US reserved force or similar. Its just going to become another Fools road. A conventional army map 1 v 1 but with 1 conventional army against a piece of **** army with no scopes + defibs on a map which ALL the flags REQUIRE scopes to defend/attack.

It also feels like you are simply recreating the Militia team.
A very true statement.

Currently the MEC are balanced to thier maps, in replacing them the team would have to be very careful not to allow them to fall behind. While these reservists are certainly better equipped than the malitia (what with scopes and whatnot) they're still not on a par with the other conventional factions. Of special concern is the slashed ammo count. This makes defense very trickey.

For example, it is preposed that ammo counts be reduced by 50%, that means riflemen get 4 spare magazines, support troops only 3 and the H-AT operator only 1.

Bear in mind that the G3 only carries 20 rounds per magazine, so the Rifleman has only 100 rounds of ammuntion ready to go. Now, this may seem alot, but compare it to a coalition soldier with 270 rounds of ammunition for his M16/L85/M4 and our MEC reservist is really on a downside. Add into that the need for suppression (which will become even more important in the next version of PR) and things really arn't looking good for this new faction.

I suppose it could be balanced by being able to deploy more fixed machineguns to highlight thier defensive nature or some such.

But yes, be careful.
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Image
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
azn_chopsticks_boi
Posts: 898
Joined: 2005-08-22 13:14

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by azn_chopsticks_boi »

I am going to assume its something like the U.S National Guard?
ReadMenace
Posts: 2567
Joined: 2007-01-16 20:05

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by ReadMenace »

Anyone know which zip I can find the skins for the Insurgent Technicals? I'm looking to reskin it for this faction.

Also, can someone find a high rez image of the MEC logo?

-REad
Waaah_Wah
Posts: 3167
Joined: 2007-07-26 13:55

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by Waaah_Wah »

Sorry, but this sounds awfully like Militia...
Never argue with an idiot, he will just drag you down to his level and beat you by experience ;)

Killing for peace is like f*cking for virginity

I :33_love: Jaymz
Cheeseman
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1291
Joined: 2006-11-12 06:23

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by Cheeseman »

Jonny wrote:Iranians as mec forces? Is it less likely than them becoming US allies?

TBH I think they would more likely side with countries geographically close to them. Am I correct in thinking the Iranian military is the only national army to be considered a terrorist organisation by the US?

Remember the whole thing is a fictional force to, it is not meant in any way to represent any real armed force. So dont think about making any 'political statement' here, just which side Iran would be more willing to join.

Would people feel better with HAT getting an RPG-29 instead of RPG-26 , assuming one is being made currently, or should this faction stick with the current 2x RPG-7V for the HAT kit?

The BMP-3 stays until something else comes along and/or the main MEC forces start to use a LOT of them. I think Brummy's DRC faction will use an older BMP1 model, so we can perhaps use theirs once they have it. But remember this is their main armoured unit, the most powerful they have. Aparently the saudis have around 150 T90s, and 600 BMP3s Kuwait has 110 more (captured by MEC forces if you want to say that). But until there is a model of the BMP-1 we can use I obviously cant add it and the BMP3 is not out of place. Either way I have asked Brummy now, just need to wait and see what happens.

The point of this faction is for them to be defensive, so any tank must be carefully thought through and added in small numbers if at all added. If we find a good armour map that calls for the MEC to be defensive (ie, holding most flags at the start) then the T62 will definately have a place. Unfortunately most of the maps I am currently aiming for dont have a place for the T62.

@ DEVs:
This faction is about 166KB ATM, but a few of the files are copies where only three lines of text needed to be added and I dont have the Khaybar model yet.
The US just recently marked the Iranian Quds Force which is Special Forces branch of the Iranian military as a terrorist organization on the allegations that it has been supporting the Iraqi Shiite Insurgents, but on the other hand you also have the US supporting the People's Mujahedin which is known by Iran as a terrorist organization, because of their countless acts to overthrow the Iranian government (conducted attacks and assassinations on Iranian targets).

To answer the rest of your suggestions I'll just copy and paste my old reply which I made a while ago, since I don't feel like having to retype the same old statement for every invidivual who suggests something similar as merging the Iranians with the MEC foces:

The MEC army represents the Arab coalition, while Iranians are Persians. Of course MEC stands for Middle Eastern Coalition so looking at it from a geographical perspective Iran is part of the Middle-East, except for the fact that in-game the MEC forces look like Arabs and speak Arabic, while Iranians speak Farsi and their appearance is somewhat different from Arabs (specially the Northern Iranians where Kashan is located). To assume that somehow the Iranians are part of the MEC just wouldn’t work either. You can't have the two of them together as Both Arabs and Persians hate one another. Arabs are Sunni Muslims, while Persians with a variety of different religions run a Shiite Muslim government (established in the 1979 Iranian revolution), because the great majority of the population are Shiites.

The MEC might represent a fictional Middle Eastern force, but we can’t assume that all Arabs, Persians, Sunni and Shiite Muslims have somehow set aside centuries of war and hate to unite against the West. Persians dislike the Arabs to the fullest degree and the same can be said about the greater Arab population. They have been at war with one another for thousands of years before US or Canada existed and they still are hostile towards one another. During the Iran-Iraq war from 1980-1988, Iraq(Arab state) received financial support from almost all major Arab countries in the Middle East. Oil rich countries like Saudi Arabia ($30.9 billion), Kuwait ($8.2 billion) and the United Arab Emirates ($8 billion) helped Saddam with costs to keep his war machine going against Iran. It cost Iran more than 200,000casualties(most with the use of chemical weapons dropped on cities by Saddam) and roughly $350 billion. This is only one of the most recent Arab-Persian conflicts, but the differences don’t end there. Today Iran is one of the only major Shiite Muslim nations, while the majority of Arab countries are Sunni Muslim states. Sunni Muslims and Shiite Muslims don’t accept one anothers' fates and there have been many wars between the two followers for centuries. One good example would be the present state of Iraq and the civil war between the Shiite followers and the Sunnis we’re seeing. The only true Arab Allied of Iran would be the Lebanese Hezbollah organization and that’s because they’re also Shiite Islam followers. Not to forget Hezbollah was originally formed and financially supported by Iran. But Hezbollah only holds 14 of the 128 seats in Lebanon's Parliament, and does not have enough power to provide sufficient support as an Allied to Iran. So realistically speaking, Iran would and never could fit into the whole MEC force in a mod like Project Reality, because the differences are too eminence to set aside.

Aside from the facial structure and skin tone differences I hardly think it’s possible that one day in the near future the Iranian people will set aside their language barrier, religion, culture, and change a great deal of their military equipment to match those of an Arab state such as Syria, Egypt, or Iraq.

By the way Iran was a very close ally of the United States prior to the Islamic revolution of 1979. I suggest you study the history of that region a little better.
SuperTimo
Posts: 2079
Joined: 2007-07-31 09:25

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by SuperTimo »

once i get more capable at mapping i'll try and russel up some specific maps for these forces, since they are defensive maps where they are defending things like industrial or military insatllations would be realistic.
Image
STORM-Mama
Posts: 735
Joined: 2008-02-19 08:10

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by STORM-Mama »

Since Iran is the only country with beaches on the northern side of the gulf of Oman that map clearly suggests that they are part of the MEC. And, yes, I also think that the idea with the Iranis joining up with the Arabs is kinda stupid. Yet another reason to get rid of the Oman map...

Btw, do the Iranis have to be a part of the MEC just because these reserve forces will be using an Iranian rifle? They could have exported some of their equipment and technology to the neighbouring countries.

Btw, what's up with the MEC flag? Why use the orange colour? The colour hasn't got any symbolics in the Islamic world at all IIRC. Red or black would fit better.
Scot
Posts: 9270
Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by Scot »

This faction could easily work, this in my eyes on EJOD will actually make them better than the MEC, as they have the smaller calibre weapon to use, making them more effective, but remember Jonny, you can always say something in the map brief like, with the MEC knowing that the Americans/British/Canadians etc will attack, they have dispatched some of their T-90(or whatever the hell they use) to assist in the defense of Al Kufrah(for example)
Image
Smegburt_funkledink
Posts: 4080
Joined: 2007-11-29 00:29

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by Smegburt_funkledink »

This is an awesome idea and some good work being done. :thumbsup:

I've read through but didn't notice... is there gonna be an alternate name like, MECuf, MECjb, GLA..?.

Will your new faction have weapons with realistic ballistics? :p

Might you rethink this faction having use of a jdam when mortars are in game?
[R-Div]Robbi "There's nothing more skanky than eating out of a tub of hummus with a screwdriver."
[R-DEV]Matrox "CHINAAAAAAA!!!"
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Re: [Proposal] Expanding MEC forces

Post by bosco_ »

Interesting, let's see how this turns out.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Community Modding”