MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Outlawz7 »

H3eadshot wrote: Just no. Get any crew you want, BTR would rip them. Even a solo BTR can beat an LAV in its sleep if the LAV don't have an engineer.
I personally took out several BTR90s with a LAV25 before, mostly on Jabal, I even had a round where I took out 3 BTR90s with the Linebacker's HEAT shells on Kashan and ended the round 30ish - 0.
Image
<1sk>Headshot
Posts: 893
Joined: 2007-05-14 21:51

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by <1sk>Headshot »

NickO wrote:Hardly.
Any good driver will flank that BTR and own it up its *** (yes right up the ***).
No, BTR still wins even when LAV is shooting at BTR *** and BTR at front.

I challenge you guys to a 1v2 :p
"Computer games don't affect kids, I mean if Pac Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching pills and listening to repetitive music."
youm0nt
Posts: 4642
Joined: 2007-03-16 15:13

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by youm0nt »

I think the LAV-25 makes up for it's smaller size and profile as compared to the BTR-90, which looks huge.
([COLOR="Yellow"]o,o)
|)__)[/COLOR]
-"-"-
O RLY?
SocketMan
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2007-03-09 22:03

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by SocketMan »

H3eadshot wrote:No, BTR still wins even when LAV is shooting at BTR *** and BTR at front.

I challenge you guys to a 1v2 :p

Feeling suicidal? :p

How do you suppose this can work in any event? We're not talking about
lining up in front of each other,counting 1,2,3 go and start firing.
That's the only way you can win 1 VS 2 against Nick0/Outlawz
Darkpowder
Posts: 1527
Joined: 2006-08-30 22:00

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Darkpowder »

APC's in Muttrah or anywhere else aren't designed to go one on one. And personally i like the assymetric vehicles as we have them. I would personally like more.

i.e. CH2 with alightly better armour, ( er and better everything) ;) Abrams slightly better mobility, T90 better firepower perhaps. (no this isn't a versus thread, please don't make it one)

The biggest enemy of APC here or anywhere else are in no particular order.

Airpower, Heavy Anti Tank weapons, Mines, Tanks.

golden rule for APCS is use the nice ammo to supply the HAT, and have your APC concentrate on its primary role, safe transportation in the face of heavy calibre machine gun and rifle fire.

The APC's in PR have an IFV role to play sometimes but getting another squad supporting you transported safely into position is a lot more useful than the enemy team -knowing- they have taken out your APC and they won't see another one for a while.
daranz
Posts: 1622
Joined: 2007-04-16 10:53

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by daranz »

For a second I imagined a bunch of APCs, all of them rolling slowly, majestically through the landscape, turrets constantly firing at each other, like some sort of a WWII battleship.
Image
Darkpowder
Posts: 1527
Joined: 2006-08-30 22:00

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Darkpowder »

More like a WWI battleship, the original concept for a tank was a "Land Ship" and the initial project was setup by the Royal Navy.
nedlands1
Posts: 1467
Joined: 2006-05-28 09:50

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by nedlands1 »

At the end of the day it should be a case of who shoots (or should I say hits) first. Whether it be 25mm or 30mm, both hulls are likely to be penetrated with single hits. The M242 cannon on the LAV-25 probably can use the M919 depleted uranium rounds that the Bradley used during the Gulf war. I've heard that Bradley's were taking out T-72 tanks with it.
Image
WildBill1337
Posts: 317
Joined: 2008-08-02 21:47

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by WildBill1337 »

ive been able to take out a BTR with a LAV 1v1, but thats only cause we were stationary, and i heard the BTR's engine around the corner and got the first shots off.
TF6049
Posts: 584
Joined: 2007-03-29 03:24

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by TF6049 »

[R-CON]Mescaldrav wrote:nooooo leave it alone Masaq!!!! Stop BALANCING!!!!! :)

Asymetric warfare rocks and its why the americans have 2 apcs on Jabal/Muttrah. If they both gang up on the BTR they can beat it easily. And besides, I like the way the MEC have something big and scary over the Americans for once. The Americans already have all the cool toys on maps where this beast lives, don't nerf the one thing thats a serious thorn in their side.....
They also have the cobra, which when used correctly, is god of the battlefield (think of having a mostly blind guy with a huge rocket launcher as your ally, and all you have to do is aim at a spot and fire a tracer or two).
"Make sure that: Suppression effect works when bullets hit penetrable metal feces too"

A funny typo by Sgt. Smeg
Pariel
Posts: 1584
Joined: 2008-01-29 23:41

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Pariel »

TF6049 wrote:They also have the cobra, which when used correctly, is god of the battlefield (think of having a mostly blind guy with a huge rocket launcher as your ally, and all you have to do is aim at a spot and fire a tracer or two).
Cobra<Zeus

I will take my lightning bolts *here* please.
Howitzer
Posts: 648
Joined: 2008-01-20 17:49

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Howitzer »

The BTR-90 has the same gun as the Havok , nuff said
Howitzer
Posts: 648
Joined: 2008-01-20 17:49

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Howitzer »

In real life i mean.
Drav
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2144
Joined: 2007-12-14 16:13

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Drav »

Well, I got taken out in a BTR by a single LAV the other day. I was scratching my balls and he got the first shot in and I was toast :(
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Rudd »

Emnyron wrote:AFAIK there is no APC`s in muttra ;)
well, you'd be wrong. there are 2 LAVs at the start and 2 BTRs on delayed spawn
Image
Phoenix.86
Posts: 424
Joined: 2007-07-23 20:22

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Phoenix.86 »

Dr2B Rudd wrote:well, you'd be wrong. there are 2 LAVs at the start and 2 BTRs on delayed spawn
You're not correct too afaik :razz: It's 2 LAV's and one BTR. Unless I'm wrong :lol:
Image

ReadMenace: "...Could be wrong, the 6th soldier could be in the fetal position in the trunk. Or on the driver's lap. :D "Is that your radio poking me SL? Oh.. Ohgod.. It's not!"
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Rudd »

1 x BTR-90 (20min respawn delay)
you are indeed correct :D
Image
Nosferatu
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4998
Joined: 2008-06-12 10:44

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Nosferatu »

and don't forget about AT-5 Spandrel on BTR, mates
"In addition to his other Asiatic characteristics, the Russian have no regard for human life and is an all out son of *****, barbarian, and chronic drunk" - General Patton : A Soldier's Life

If violence isn't the answer, then you obviously need more violence.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”