WWWWWAAIT? Did you just say Shilka cannon + Ural?[R-CON]Mineral wrote:PR's Technicals are too small to put a AA cannon on the back unfortunately.
Ural truck + new ZU-23-2 is on it's way though![]()
Syrian CAS:
http://i.imgur.com/Mk9kdvF.jpg
WWWWWAAIT? Did you just say Shilka cannon + Ural?[R-CON]Mineral wrote:PR's Technicals are too small to put a AA cannon on the back unfortunately.
Ural truck + new ZU-23-2 is on it's way though![]()
Oh, its only a twin barrel and only 400RPM effective! Phew, I thought this would be game over for the "flying tank"..'[R-CON wrote:Mine-2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url]
[url=http://en.wikral;1990196']a zu-23-2 is not a shilka cannon.
ZU-23ipedia.org/wiki/ZSU-23-4]ZSU-23-4 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
'[R-COM wrote:LITOralis.nMd;1976094']What ever happened to the Zeus mounted on the ammo techie ? There is a thread somewhere in the modding forums, and I saw a picture of what looked like a nearly completed model.
BEHOLD: I remembered the thread:
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f388-p ... ncept.html


I agree...eversmen_br wrote:Guys we really need a descent transport for insurgents , the .50 call techie always gets taken by lone wolfs and the likes of, used mainly to attack.
It's really bad for logistics having just bikes, ammo techie and the cardboard car left ... a pure transport techie would be welcome and it's as realistic an asset can get...also player driven rules so it's used mainly for transport of troops
(using the same model we have, removing the weapons creating a new asset)

Admins still want to play the game. But if I see someone solo a vehicle I report them. Especially if I need one for my squad.PatrickLA_CA wrote:IMO server admins also need to think about claimable transport and armed techies for infantry squads. Most of the times they are being soloed.
