suppression effects.
-
gazzthompson
- Posts: 8012
- Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05
-
77SiCaRiO77
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 4982
- Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44
-
flik
- Posts: 80
- Joined: 2007-02-09 17:50
-
gazzthompson
- Posts: 8012
- Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05
thats not suppressive fire then, thats accurate kill shots, or what ever the military term is, if ur going for kill shots u might aswell just use a scope. which would decrease the length of the firefight and make the game more arcade.BloodBane611 wrote:Until it crashes? I don't think I like it enough to do that....
The fact that suppression isn't very effective definitely contributes to the arcady-ness. I think that the best way to make suppression work is to increase the effectiveness of suppressive weapons, thereby making it more likely that players who try and pop up under suppressive fire will be killed, and not make that mistake again.
also im going to play a round with the FH2 effects on, see how well i get suppressed. how do i do it again ? just alt f4 out of the game then start PR up ?
Last edited by gazzthompson on 2007-12-26 17:26, edited 1 time in total.
-
[T]Terranova7
- Posts: 1073
- Joined: 2005-06-19 20:28
You simply can't simulate that ingame, as the fear of death is virtually non-existent in games. Suppression fire is deadly as it is, it's just that all the enemy player needs is about a second or two to take that laser accurate pop shot on your head.BloodBane611 wrote:Until it crashes? I don't think I like it enough to do that....
The fact that suppression isn't very effective definitely contributes to the arcady-ness. I think that the best way to make suppression work is to increase the effectiveness of suppressive weapons, thereby making it more likely that players who try and pop up under suppressive fire will be killed, and not make that mistake again.
The FH2 suppression effects are highly needed, as it would serve as the ultimate deterrent during intense firefights. No more simple standoffs with jack-in-the-box rifleman, we might actually see players constantly maneuvering to acquire a better firing position. Players would actually take cover, disperse, fall back, flank etc. Not just get shot at, turn around and attempt to kill the guy shooting you.
-
gazzthompson
- Posts: 8012
- Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05
thank you !!!! in PR if some one is suppressed enough not to be able to see then they will HAVE to manoeuvre or be out manoeuvred themselfs. it will make flanking so much more of a asset.Terranova wrote:You simply can't simulate that ingame, as the fear of death is virtually non-existent in games. Suppression fire is deadly as it is, it's just that all the enemy player needs is about a second or two to take that laser accurate pop shot on your head.
The FH2 suppression effects are highly needed, as it would serve as the ultimate deterrent during intense firefights. No more simple standoffs with jack-in-the-box rifleman, we might actually see players constantly maneuvering to acquire a better firing position. Players would actually take cover, disperse, fall back, flank etc. Not just get shot at, turn around and attempt to kill the guy shooting you.
also, if im correct, military doctrine would show that if ur "suppressive" fire is accurate enough to kill some 1 poping there head up, well then its not suppressive fire.
-
[T]Terranova7
- Posts: 1073
- Joined: 2005-06-19 20:28
You're correct, just took these quotes from wiki.gazzthompson wrote: also, if im correct, military doctrine would show that if ur "suppressive" fire is accurate enough to kill some 1 poping there head up, well then its not suppressive fire.
Suppressive fire (also known as covering fire) is a term used in military science for firing weapons at or in the direction of enemy forces with the primary goal of reducing their ability to defend themselves or return fire, by forcing them to remain under cover.
Whole article - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppression_fireSuppressive fire differs from lethal fire (i.e. shoot-to-kill) in that its primary objective is to get the enemy to "keep their heads down" and thus reduce their ability to move, shoot, or observe their surroundings. While soldiers may be injured or killed by suppressive fire, this is not its main purpose.
-
gazzthompson
- Posts: 8012
- Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05
the highlighted is what FH2 or similar effects deliver in game which can then mean;wiki wrote:"Pinned down" is a common military term for a unit that is currently being suppressed by enemy fire. A suppressed unit has lost its ability to move, lost all or most of its ability to return fire, and lost much of its ability to gather real-time intelligence on the enemy position, as it is concerned with staying under cover.
wiki wrote:Suppression is a key tactical goal utilized in most small unit tactics and will afford the attacking (or suppressing) unit with greater security of movement, intelligence, and tactical flexibility. Often, a suppressed unit will lose organizational efficiency and morale if kept in that state for an extended period of time.
that's what PR battles should be like!!^^^^^ not insta heashots and suppressive fire that dosnt do anything!!!
any DEV response ?
-
Rambo Hunter
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: 2006-12-22 18:40
-
markonymous
- Posts: 1358
- Joined: 2007-10-25 05:20
-
Soulja
- Posts: 611
- Joined: 2006-10-09 20:50
-
VipersGhost
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: 2007-03-27 18:34
Well there aren't going to be insta-headshots anymore. Changing stances unsettles your "aiming" doesn't it? I'm not sure on this but if I'm right then suppression fire might actually work now with the new rifle mechanics. No more proning for insta-accuracy etc. So now you can pop up and return fire but you sure aren't going to hit much and might be getting killed yourself...thus giving the guy on the bad side of suppression no advantages. 0.7 is about to be out, lets wait and see what it looks like. I wasn't to fond of the FH2 effects, they seem like way to much. Sure you get the desired effect maybe but it didn't seem right.
-
gazzthompson
- Posts: 8012
- Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05
if u r killing a guy then its not suppressive fire. plus, he shouldn't be poping up in the first place.VipersGhost wrote:Well there aren't going to be insta-headshots anymore. Changing stances unsettles your "aiming" doesn't it? I'm not sure on this but if I'm right then suppression fire might actually work now with the new rifle mechanics. No more proning for insta-accuracy etc. So now you can pop up and return fire but you sure aren't going to hit much and might be getting killed yourself...thus giving the guy on the bad side of suppression no advantages. 0.7 is about to be out, lets wait and see what it looks like. I wasn't to fond of the FH2 effects, they seem like way to much. Sure you get the desired effect maybe but it didn't seem right.
-
scandhi
- Posts: 293
- Joined: 2006-02-02 20:53
Wount the new rifle mechanics give this suppression effect, when you cant' just stand up adn return accurate fire. If you get MG fire your way, why pop up, wait 1,8 sec to squiz the trigger and getting your body pierced whilst doing so?
Super mario brothers: Nothing beats reality like killing turtles while high on shrooms and flying with a cape
-
[T]Terranova7
- Posts: 1073
- Joined: 2005-06-19 20:28
That's the whole point though, the player shouldn't be given a chance to pop his/her head around the corner to take those potshots in the first place. And no matter how the rifle mechanics are changed, a player attempting to put down suppression fire is going to be a lot more inaccurate than a player who will take precise, single round shots. Combined with the non-existent fear of death firefights become standoffs as opposed to fire and maneuvering. Having something similar to FH2 suppression effects is the ultimate solution, there is no substitute.scandhi wrote:Wount the new rifle mechanics give this suppression effect, when you cant' just stand up adn return accurate fire. If you get MG fire your way, why pop up, wait 1,8 sec to squiz the trigger and getting your body pierced whilst doing so?
-
Sadist_Cain
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: 2007-08-22 14:47
Hell yes + 1Terranova wrote:Having something similar to FH2 suppression effects is the ultimate solution, there is no substitute.
can't stand the fact that when your shooting at someone and you get the suppression blurriness you can still see ok to take a shot if you try. and with aim deviation working against suppression gunners as they have to fire their bursts of rounds, the rifle man being "suppressed" will still be able to see who's suppressing him and just wait for the gap in his bursts.
I know the devs have tried to make the support gun more effective for 0.7 but I just cant see how it can happen while I can still function fine while I've got 50 cal bullets zinging over my head. It dosn't matter if he needs to stabilize his gun for a second or so, as long as he can still see and feel "comfy" where he is, then he isnt being suppressed.
FH2 suppression makes you want to lie down and hide (suppression's job) whilest it sounds like the 0.7 aim deviation will just make it harder for support gunners to aim while a rifleman with barely blurred vision spots the support and shoots
Last edited by Sadist_Cain on 2007-12-27 06:40, edited 1 time in total.







