[Static Model] Nimitz class carrier

Making or wanting help making your own asset? Check in here
PlatinumA1
Posts: 381
Joined: 2007-06-25 07:31

Post by PlatinumA1 »

k i have downloaded the 3ds max9 trail , and i have to say this isnt hard as i thought , right now i am playing with it and i have to say after watching the tutorial vids i can prolly finish this project less then a year , including a secret project hehehe
jarleif
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 331
Joined: 2005-05-03 13:56

Post by jarleif »

I dont know if this will come as incouragement or not but it is meant to be. When i first started modeling i learned a few basics, but then jumped right in. This was one of my first models:

Image
Image
Image
Image

So if you want to make one you can, it will be hard and time consuming. The hardest part will probably be the UVs
Image
PlatinumA1
Posts: 381
Joined: 2007-06-25 07:31

Post by PlatinumA1 »

thats pretty cool , how come you never finished it :P ?
ice_killer
Posts: 2361
Joined: 2007-02-15 16:20

Post by ice_killer »

jarleif wrote: So if you want to make one you can, it will be hard and time consuming. The hardest part will probably be the UVs

break it up it more part's like a front part jsut what DICE did then the UV will be a lot easyer to handel
I7 980X, REX3, Dominator GT 12G, 4X XFXHD6970 2G yes Quadfire , SSD 3x Raptors 2X 1.2 KW :mrgreen:
jarleif
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 331
Joined: 2005-05-03 13:56

Post by jarleif »

yes, eventually it will be broken up, but non detail layers, i want to do it in larger sections, then break it up even more. The reason i havent finished it is because i have too many more important things to get done.....like USI :)
Image
hall0
Posts: 1700
Joined: 2007-06-09 17:20

Post by hall0 »

Very good
kristofer
Posts: 149
Joined: 2006-05-02 12:27

Post by kristofer »

(T)eflon(S)hadow wrote:Image
Dayamn, that thing is armed to the teeth.
"Bad area round 'ere boy,
a lotta bad types,
a lotta mean people...
a lotta nutters."


Beafy: sleep is too tireing
[SAF]stal20048
Posts: 443
Joined: 2006-07-29 18:29

Post by [SAF]stal20048 »

not to mention all the aircraft it can dispatch :o
Griffon2-6
Posts: 2487
Joined: 2006-05-26 04:21

Post by Griffon2-6 »

Most military vessels are armed to the teeth. This is gonna be a long shot, but after you're done (lol), you might want to consider the Admiral Kuznetsov for the Russians, which is also the same thing as the Ukrainian Varyag for the Chinese. Then you can have carrier to carrier engagements on 17km^2 maps.
Cerberus
Posts: 2727
Joined: 2005-11-15 22:24

Post by Cerberus »

'[R-MOD wrote:Griffon2-6']Most military vessels are armed to the teeth. This is gonna be a long shot, but after you're done (lol), you might want to consider the Admiral Kuznetsov for the Russians, which is also the same thing as the Ukrainian Varyag for the Chinese. Then you can have carrier to carrier engagements on 17km^2 maps.
Coral Sea was such a great map...
"Practice proves more than theory, in any case."

- Abraham Lincoln


"i so regret searching "giant hentai penis" on google images though ;_;"

- Garabaldi
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Post by Maxfragg »

would be really funny to have a carrier vs carrier map with US vs China (since the US will not fight against the Russians)

great work btw and so or so a Kuznetsov would really also be awsome
ice_killer
Posts: 2361
Joined: 2007-02-15 16:20

Post by ice_killer »

yea some thiung like this name

atack_on_paerl_harbor_2007 :D
I7 980X, REX3, Dominator GT 12G, 4X XFXHD6970 2G yes Quadfire , SSD 3x Raptors 2X 1.2 KW :mrgreen:
Griffon2-6
Posts: 2487
Joined: 2006-05-26 04:21

Post by Griffon2-6 »

Cerberus wrote:Coral Sea was such a great map...
Coral Sea?
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

'[R-MOD wrote:Griffon2-6']Coral Sea?
bf1942 map, carrier vs carrier air battle map.
Image
Clypp
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2006-07-17 18:36

Post by Clypp »

Maxfragg wrote:would be really funny to have a carrier vs carrier map with US vs China (since the US will not fight against the Russians)
You mean because in the PR setup the Russians and the US is the same team (Team 1) whereas the Chinese, MEC, etc are on the other team?

Or do you mean scenario wise? Who knows what can happen in the future and it does not matter in terms of gameplay. Just the other week Putin send a fleet of bombers toward UK airspace as a threat to NATO's policies.
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Post by Maxfragg »

i meant team wise
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

Post by LtSoucy »

yea some thiung like this name

atack_on_paerl_harbor_2007
2 years ago in US a person got sued over saying that. Bt on the map ill say yes!
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

Post by LtSoucy »

annd also why cant we use the carrier from SF? its the same thing he is going to build!
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
Crusader09
Posts: 179
Joined: 2007-06-26 16:51

Post by Crusader09 »

would be really funny to have a carrier vs carrier map with US vs China


Good luck trying that one. China only has one Russian made carrier in their navy and it is in pretty bad shape. Probably doesn't even have an engine. Would be a very bad battle for China in that map. Might sink as soon as the game starts.
=ICC=
In game name: ELITE_TANKER

"Discipline is the soul of an army. It makes small numbers formidable; procures success to the weak, and esteem to all."
-George Washington
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Post by Maxfragg »

the "thing from SF" is the same landing craft that is already in Battlefield 2 just with rooms inside and it isn't even half of the sice of a nimitz class aircraft carrier, those landingcrafts can only launch vertical take of jets like the harrier and helicopters, in real live a F/A-18 can not start from this baby carrier
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Community Modding”